Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 25, Number 6, Novembre-Décembre 2016
Production agricole et sécurité alimentaire en Afrique de l’Ouest. Coordonnateurs : Sandrine Dury, Eric Vall, Jacques Imbernon
Article Number 65001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016038
Published online 22 November 2016
  • Arsenault JE, Nikiema L, Alleman P, Ayassou KA, Lanou H, Moursi M, et al. 2014. Seasonal differences in food and nutrient intakes among young children and their mothers in rural Burkina Faso. J Nutr Sci 3: e55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bégin F, Frongillo EA, Delisle H. 1999. Caregiver behaviors and resources influence child height-for-age in rural Chad. J Nutr 129 (3): 680–686. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bergeret A, Ribot J. 1990. L’arbre nourricier en pays sahélien. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme. [Google Scholar]
  • Bhagowalia P, Headey D, Kadiyala S. 2012. Agriculture, income, and nutrition linkages in India: insights from a nationally representative survey. In: IFPRI Discussion Paper 01195. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaney S, Beaudry M, Latham M. 2009. Contribution of natural resources to nutritional status in a protected area of Gabon. Food Nutr Bull 30 (1): 49–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boedecker J, Termote C, Assogbadjo A, Van Damme P, Lachat C. 2014. Dietary contribution of wild edible plants to women's diets in the buffer zone around the Lama forest, Benin – an underutilized potential. Food Secur 6 (6): 833–849. doi: 10.1007/ s12571-014-0396-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bricas N, Akindes F. 2012. Afrique de l’Ouest. In: Poulain J.P. (ed.). Dictionnaire des cultures alimentaires. Paris: PUF, p. 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Carletto G, Ruel M, Winters P, Zezza A. 2015. Farm-level pathways to improved nutritional status: introduction to the special issue. J Dev Stud 51: 651–957. [Google Scholar]
  • Cilss. 2004. Vingt ans de prévention des crises alimentaires au Sahel. Bilan et perspectives. Ouagadougou: Cilss. [Google Scholar]
  • Dillon A, McGee K, Oseni G. 2014. Agricultural production, dietary diversity, and climate variability. In: World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No. 7022. [Google Scholar]
  • Doss C. 2005. The effects of intrahousehold property ownership on expenditure patterns in Ghana. J Afr Econ 15 (1): 149–180. doi: 10.1093/jae/eji025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Duflo E, Udry C. 2004. Intrahousehold resource allocation in Cote d’Ivoire: social norms, separate accounts and consumption choices. In: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 10498. [Google Scholar]
  • Dury S, Bocoum I. 2012. Le paradoxe de Sikasso : pourquoi produire plus ne suffit-il pas pour bien nourrir les enfants des familles d’agriculteurs. Cah Agric 21 (5): 324–336. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoddinott J, Haddad L. 1995. Does female income share influence household expenditures? Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Oxford: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, pp. 77–95. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones D, Shrinivas A, Bezner-Kerr R. 2014. Farm production diversity is associated with greater household dietary diversity in Malawi: findings from nationally representative data. Food Policy 46: 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly VA, Tefft JF, Oehmke JF, Staatz JM. 2004. Identifying policy relevant variables for reducing childhood malnutrition in rural Mali. In: Department of Agricultural Economics Staff Paper Series, Michigan State University. Available from http://purl.umn.edu/11528. [Google Scholar]
  • Lourme-Ruiz A, Maugérard E. 2014. Le paradoxe des Hauts-Bassins : produire plus pour nourrir mieux ? Film documentaire 42 minutes, version française et anglaise, disponible sur https://vimeo.com/120670833. [Google Scholar]
  • Malapit HJ, Kadiyala S, Quisumbing A, Cunningham K, Tyagi P. 2015. Women's empowerment mitigates the negative effects of low production diversity on maternal and child nutrition in Nepal. J Dev Stud 51: 1097–1123 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin-Prével Y, Allemand P, Wiesmann D, Arimond M, Ballard T, Deitchler M, et al. 2015. Moving forward on choosing a standard operational indicator of women's dietary diversity. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller D, Welch R. 2013. Food system strategies for preventing micronutrient malnutrition. Food Policy 42: 83–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Parent G, Zagré NM, Ouédraogo A, Guiguembé TR. 2002. Les grands hydro-aménagements au Burkina Faso contribuent-ils à l’amélioration des situations nutritionnelles des enfants ? Cah Agric 11 (1): 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Powell B, Hall J, Johns T. 2011. Forest cover, use and dietary intake in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Int For Rev 13 (3): 305–324. [Google Scholar]
  • Powell B, Maundu P, Kuhnlein HV, Johns T. 2013. Wild foods from farm and forest in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Ecol Food Nutr 52 (6): 451–478. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2013.768122. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruel MT, Alderman H, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. 2013. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet 382 (9891): 536–551. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sibhatu T, Krishna V, Qaim M. 2015. Production diversity and dietary diversity in smallholder farm households. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112 (34): 10657–10662. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • StataCorp. 2011. BT Stata statistical software: release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. [Google Scholar]
  • Tefft J, Penders C, Kelly V, Staatz JM, Yade M, Wise V. 2000. Linkages between agricultural growth and improved child nutrition in Mali. In: Michigan State University International Development Working Papers, 79 p. xiii–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Torheim LE, Ouattara F, Diarra MM, Thiam FD, Barikmo I, Hatløy A, et al. 2004. Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants. Eur J Clin Nutr 58: 594–604. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601853. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.