Cah. Agric.
Volume 26, Number 4, Juillet-Août 2017
Innovation Platforms and Projects to support smallholder development - Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa. Coordonnateurs : Janice Jiggins, Jean-Yves Jamin
Article Number 45001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Études originales / Original Studies
Published online 10 July 2017
  • APROMA. 1995. Étude de la filière karité du Burkina Faso. Rapport principal. Contrat no 01/DEL/94. Bamako, Mali: Association des produits à marché, Vol. 168, p. + annexes p. [Google Scholar]
  • Avelino F, Rotmans J. 2009. Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory 12(4): 543–569. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Derks E, Lusby F. 2006. Mali Shea Kernel: value chain case study. ACDI/VOCA. Accelerated microenterprise advancement project (AMAP). [Google Scholar]
  • Elias M, Carney J. 2007. African shea butter: a feminized subsidy from nature. Africa-london-international african institute 77(1): 37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elias M, Saussey M. 2013. ‘The Gift that keeps on giving’: unveiling the paradoxes of fair trade shea butter. Sociologia Ruralis 53(2): 158–179. [Google Scholar]
  • Fold N, Reenberg A. 1999. In the shadow of the 'chocolate war': local marketing of shea nut products around Tenkodogo, Burkina Faso. Geografisk Tidsskrift / Danish Journal of Geography Special Issue 2: 113–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Fuchs D, Glaab K. 2011. Material power and normative conflict in global and local agrifood governance: The lessons of ‘Golden Rice’in India. Food Policy 36(6): 729–735. [Google Scholar]
  • Greig D. 2006. Shea butter: connecting rural Burkinabè women to international markets through fair trade. Development in Practice 16(5): 465–475. [Google Scholar]
  • Henry A, Chithra V, Nair N. 1983. Vitellaria vs. Butyrospermum (Sapotaceae). Taxon 32(2): 282–286. [Google Scholar]
  • Hounkonnou D, Kossou D, Kuyper TW, Leeuwis C, Nederlof ES, Röling N, et al. 2012. An innovation systems approach to institutional change: smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 108: 74–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Hounkonnou D, Brouwers J, van Huis A, Jigginss J, Kossou D, Röling N, et al. 2016. Triggering regime change: a comparative analysis of the performance of innovation platforms that attempted to change the institutional context for nine agricultural domains in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 108(2012): 74–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Klerkx L, Aarts N. 2013. The interaction of multiple champions in orchestrating innovation networks: conflicts and complementarities. Technovation 33(6): 193–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klerkx L, Aarts N, Leeuwis C. 2010. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 103(6): 390–400. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence TB, Hardy C, Phillips N. 2002. Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: the emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 281–290. Doi 10.2307/3069297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leeuwis C. 2004. Changing views of agricultural innovation: implications for communicative intervention and science. Research to impact: case studies for natural resource management for irrigated rice in Asia 2010: 15–32 [Google Scholar]
  • Lusby F, Derks E. 2006. Shea kernels from Mali: a value chain case study. Small enterprise development 17(2): 36–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ministère du Développment rural. 2001. Schéma Directeur du secteur du développement rural (SDDR). Bamako: Ministère du Développment rural − Cellule de planification et de statistique. [Google Scholar]
  • Nederlof ES, Pyburn R. 2012. One finger cannot lift a rock: facilitating innovation platforms to trigger institutional change in West Africa. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers, 144 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Nederlof S, Wongtschowski M, van der Lee F, eds. 2011. Putting heads together: agricultural innovation platforms in practice. Amsterdam: KIT Publishers, KIT Development, Policy & Practice. [Google Scholar]
  • Pawson R, Tilley N. 1997. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage, 235 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Peppelenbos L. 2008. Pro-poor market development: an approach and quick-scan screening tool for pro-poor business propositions. KIT working papers series C1. Amsterdam: KIT. [Google Scholar]
  • Perri 6, Bellamy C. 2012. Principle of Metodology: research design in social science. London, UK: Sage, 324 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Röling N, Jiggins J, Hounkonnou D, van Huis A. 2014. Agricultural research − from recommendation domains to arenas for interaction: experiences from West Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 43(3): 179–185. DOI: 10.5367/oa.2014.0172. [Google Scholar]
  • Sidibé A. 2013. Analysis of collective performance in the Malian shea sector: from fields to markets. Netherlands: Wageningen University, 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sidibé A, Vellema S, Dembélé F, Traoré M, Kuyper TW. 2012. Innovation processes navigated by women groups in the Malian shea sector: How targeting of international niche markets results in fragmentation and obstructs co-ordination. Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 60–63: 29–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2012.06.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sidibé A, Vellema S, Dembélé F, Témé B, Yossi H, Traoré M, et al. 2014. Women, shea, and finance: how institutional practices in a Malian cooperative create development impact. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2014.909640. [Google Scholar]
  • Spielman DJ. 2005. Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: a critical review. International food policy research institute (IFPRI). International service for national agricultural research (ISNAR) division. [Google Scholar]
  • van Paassen A, Klerkx L, Adu-Acheampong R, Adjei-Nsiah S, Zannoue E. 2014. Agricultural innovation platforms in West Africa: how does strategic institutional entrepreneurship unfold in different value chain contexts? Outlook on Agriculture 43(3): 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  • Vellema S, Nakimbugwe D, Mwesige D. 2011. The Ugandan oil seed sub-sector platform. In: Nederlof S, Wongtschowski M, Lee FVD, eds. Putting heads together: agricultural innovation platforms in practice. Amsterdam: KIT publishers, pp. 114–123. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.