Open Access
Article de Recherche / Research Article
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 29, 2020
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020016
Published online 27 July 2020
  • Almeida-Dias J, Rui-Figueira J, Roy B. 2010. ELECTRE TRI-C: a multiple criteria sorting method based on characteristic reference actions. European Journal of Operational Research 204: 565–580. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.018. [Google Scholar]
  • Altieri MA. 1995. Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture, 2nd ed. Boulder, USA: Westview Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Angelliaume-Descamps A, Tulet JC. 2005. Agriculture et environnement. In : Vergnolle-Mainar C, Desailly B, eds. Environnement et sociétés : territoires, risques, développement, éducation. Toulouse, France: CRDP Midi-Pyrénées, pp. 43–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Aouadi N, Macary F. 2018. Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding method to assess vine production systems performances concerning pesticides and health near Bordeaux metropole. In: 88th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding (EWG-MCDA), 27–29th September 2018, Lisbon. [Google Scholar]
  • Aubertot JN, Barbier JM, Carpentier A, et al., eds. 2005. Pesticides, agriculture et environnement. Réduire l’utilisation des pesticides et en limiter les impacts environnementaux. Expertise scientifique collective INRA, Cemagref. Paris, France: INRA, Cemagref. [Google Scholar]
  • Baldi I, Lebailly P, Rondeau V, et al. 2012. Levels and determinants of pesticide exposure in operators involved in treatment of vineyards: results of the PESTEXPO study. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 22: 593–600. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bockstaller C, Guichard L, Makowski D, Aveline A, Girardin P, Plantureux S. 2008. Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28: 139–149. prodinra.inra.fr/record/21282. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Dalgaard T, Hutchings NJ, Porter JR. 2003. Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 100: 39–51. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00152-X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doré T, Makowski D, Malézieux E, Munier-Jolain N, Tchamitchiane M, Tittonell P. 2011. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy 34: 197–210. hal-agroparistech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01355604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorioz JM, Ombredane D. 2004. Bassin versant et qualité biologique des cours d’eau. Effets de la gestion des bassins versants sur les transferts particulaires et dissous et sur la qualité biologique des eaux de surface en zone d’élevage. Action structurante INRA-Cemagref « AQUAE ». Rapport de travaux de recherches pour la gestion des agrosystèmes et les conséquences sur les hydrosystèmes. Paris, France: INRA, Cemagref. [Google Scholar]
  • Figueira J, Roy B. 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos procedure. European Journal of Operational Research 139(2): 317–326. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Gouraud V, Baglinière JL, Baran P, Sabaton C, Lim P, Ombredane D. 2001. Factors regulating brown trout populations in two French rivers: application of a dynamic population model. Regulated Rivers Research & Management 17: 557–569. DOI: 10.1002/rrr.655. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • INRA. 2010. Ecophyto R&D. Which options to reduce pesticide use? Paris, France: INRA. [Google Scholar]
  • Macary F, Ombredane D, Uny D. 2010. A multicriteria spatial analysis of erosion risk into small watersheds in the low Normandy bocage (France) by ELECTRE III method coupled with a GIS. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making 1: 25–48. DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2010.033685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Macary F, Leccia O, Almeida-Dias J, Morin S, Sanchez-Pérez JM. 2013a. Agro-environmental risk evaluation by a spatialised multi-criteria modelling combined with the PIXAL method. International Journal of Geomatics & Spatial Analysis 23: 39–70. DOI: 10.3166/rig.23.39-70. [Google Scholar]
  • Macary F, Almeida-Dias J, Uny D, Probst A. 2013b. Assessment of the effects of best environmental practices on reducing pesticide pollution in surface water, using multi-criteria modelling combined with a GIS. International Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision 3(2–3): 178–211. DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2013.053725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Macary F, Almeida-Dias J, Rui-Figueira J, Roy, B. 2014. A multiple criteria decision analysis model based on ELECTRE Tri-C for erosion risk assessment in agricultural areas. Environmental Modelling & Assessment 19: 221–242. DOI: 10.1007/s10666-013-9387-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MAAF. 2012. Agricultures, produisons autrement : projet agro-écologique pour la France. Paris, France: Ministère en charge de l’agriculture. [Google Scholar]
  • MAAPRAT-MEDD. 2011. Guide pratique pour la conception de systèmes de culture plus économes en produits phytosanitaires. Application aux systèmes de polyculture. Paris, France: Ministères en charge de l’agriculture et de l’écologie. [Google Scholar]
  • MAP. 2008. Plan Ecophyto 2018 de réduction des usages de pesticides 2008–2018. Paris, France: Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche. [Google Scholar]
  • MEDDTL. 2010. Le Grenelle de l’environnement. Loi Grenelle 2. Mode d’emploi. Ce que dit la loi. Paris, France: Ministère français de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement. [Google Scholar]
  • Mghirbi O, Ellefi K, Le Grusse P, et al. 2016. Assessing plant protection practices using pressure indicator and toxicity risk indicators: analysis of the relationship between these indicators for improved risk management, application in viticulture. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22: 8058–8074. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3736-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Pelt JM. 2001. La terre en héritage. Paris, France: Fayard. [Google Scholar]
  • Pelzer E, Fortino G, Bockstaller C, et al. 2012. Assessing innovative cropping systems with DEXiPM, a qualitative multi-criteria assessment tool derived from DEXi. Ecological Indicators 18: 171–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.019. [Google Scholar]
  • Pujol JL, Dron D. 1998. Agriculture, monde rural et environnement. Qualité oblige. Paris, France: La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy B. 1968. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Revue française d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelle (RIRO) 2(8): 57–75. http://www.numdam.org/article/RO_1968__2_1_57_0.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy B. 1985. Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision. Paris, France: Economica. [Google Scholar]
  • Sadok W, Angevin F, Bergez JE, et al. 2009. MASC, a qualitative multi-attribute decision model for ex ante assessment of the sustainability of cropping systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29(1): 447–461. DOI: 10.1051/agro/2009006. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Werf HMG. 1996. Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 60: 81–96. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01096-1. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.