Open Access
Cah. Agric.
Volume 33, 2024
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 05 June 2024
  • Acheampong EO, Macgregor CJ, Sloan S, Sayer J. 2019. Deforestation is driven by agricultural expansion in Ghana’s forest reserves. Scientific African 5: e00146. [Google Scholar]
  • Agrawal A., 1995. Population pressure= forest degradation: an over simplistic equation. Unasylva 181: 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Alcorn JB, Bamba J, Masiun S, Natalia I, Royo AG. 2003. Keeping ecological resilience afloat in cross-scale turbulence: an indigenous social movement navigates change in Indonesia. In: Berkes F,Colding J, Holling C (ed). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge (New York ): Cambridge University Press, p. 299–327. [Google Scholar]
  • Alemu B. 2015. The effect of land use land cover change on land degradation in the highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science 5: 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • Alexander A, Walker H, Delabre I. 2022. A decision theory perspective on wicked problems, SDGs and stakeholders: the case of deforestation. Journal of Business Ethics 180 : 975–995. [Google Scholar]
  • Balint PJ. 2011. Wicked environmental problems: managing uncertainty and conflict. Washington: Island Press, 207 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbier EB. 2004. Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 : 1347–1353. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnaud C, Van Paassen A, Trébuil G, Promburom T, Bousquet F. 2010. Dealing with power games in a companion modelling process: lessons from community water management in Thailand highlands. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 16: 55–74. [Google Scholar]
  • Blackie R, Baldauf C, Gautier D, Gumbo D, Kassa H, Parthasarathy N, et al. 2014. Tropical dry forests: the state of global knowledge and recommendations for future research. Discussion Paper. Indonesia, Bogor: CIFOR. [Google Scholar]
  • Boserup E. 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure (1st ed.) London: Routledge, 35 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown G, Eckold H. 2020. An evaluation of public participation information for land use decisions: public comment, surveys, and participatory mapping. Local Environment 25 : 85100. [Google Scholar]
  • Buchadas A, Baumann M, Meyfroidt P, Kuemmerle T. 2022. Uncovering major types of deforestation frontiers across the world’s tropical dry woodlands. Nature Sustainability 5 : 619–627. [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers R. 1994. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): analysis of experience. World Development 22: 1253–1268. [Google Scholar]
  • Chapin M, Lamb Z, Threlkeld B. 2005. Mapping indigenous lands. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 619–638. [Google Scholar]
  • Churchman CW. 1967. Wicked problems. Management Science 4 : 141–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Corbett J. 2009. Good practices in participatory mapping: A review prepared for the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Uttar Pradesh, International Fund for Agricultural Development. [Google Scholar]
  • Cumming GS, Cumming DH, Redman CL. 2006. Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society 11: 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Davelaar D. 2021. Transformation for sustainability: a deep leverage points approach. Sustainability Science 16: 727–747. [Google Scholar]
  • David RM, Rosser NJ, Donoghue DN. 2022. Remote sensing for monitoring tropical dryland forests: a review of current research, knowledge gaps and future directions for Southern Africa. Environmental Research Communications 4 : 042001. [Google Scholar]
  • Davies KK, Fisher KT, Dickson ME, Thrush SF, Le Heron R. 2015. Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. Ecology and Society 20: 37. [Google Scholar]
  • DeGraff AK, Ramlal B. 2015. Participatory mapping: Caribbean small island developing states. Regional Human Development Report on Multidimensional Progress for Human Development in Latin American and the Caribbean, United Nations Development Report. [Google Scholar]
  • Delay E, Ka A, Niang K, Touré I, Goffner D. 2022. Coming back to a Commons approach to construct the Great Green Wall in Senegal. Land Use Policy 115: 106000. [Google Scholar]
  • Djoudi H, Vergles E, Blackie RR, Koame CK, Gautier D. 2015. Dry forests, livelihoods and poverty alleviation: understanding current trends. International Forestry Review 17: 54–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis E, Pontius Jr RG. 2006. Land-use and land-cover change − encyclopaedia of earth. Environmental Protection 2: 142–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Gotore T, Muchawona A, Murepa R, Tembani M, Mutete P, Muchena R et al. 2019. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Zimbabwe. STZNDC Report: Government of Zimbabwe/UNDP. [Google Scholar]
  • Gumbo D, Clendenning J, Martius C, Moombe K, Grundy I, Nasi R et al. 2018. How have carbon stocks in central and southern Africa’s miombo woodlands changed over the last 50 years? A systematic map of the evidence. Environmental Evidence 7: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoang NT, Kanemoto K. 2021. Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5: 845–853. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamanga P, Vedeld P, Sjaastad E. 2009. Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecological Economics 68: 613–624. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamwi JM, Endjala J, Siyambango N. 2020. Dependency of rural communities on non-timber forest products in the dry lands of southern Africa: a case of Mukwe Constituency, Kavango East Region, Namibia. Trees, Forests and People 2: 100022. [Google Scholar]
  • Lepers E, Lambin EF, Janetos AC, DeFries R, Achard F, Ramankutty N et al. 2005. A synthesis of information on rapid land-cover change for the period 1981- 2000. BioScience 55: 115–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu H, Gong P, Wang J, Clinton N, Bai Y, Liang S. 2020. Annual dynamics of global land cover and its long-term changes from 1982 to 2015. Earth System Science Data 12: 1217–1243. [Google Scholar]
  • Lönngren J, Van Poeck K. 2021. Wicked problems: A mapping review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 28: 481–502. [Google Scholar]
  • Malhi Y, Franklin J, Seddon N, Solan M, Turner MG, Field CB et al. 2020. Climate change and ecosystems: Threats, opportunities and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Mammadova A, Behagel J, Masiero M, Pettenella D. 2022. Deforestation as a systemic risk: the case of Brazilian bovine leather. Forests 13: 233. [Google Scholar]
  • Mapfumo RB, Murwira A, Masocha M, Andriani R. 2017. Detection of subtle deforestation due to logging using satellite remote sensing in wet and dry savanna woodlands of Southern Africa. Geocarto International 32: 514–530. [Google Scholar]
  • Mataruse PT, Nyikahadzoi K, Fallot A. 2021. Social-ecologically Driven Threats to the Climate Change Mitigation Potential of Forests: A Case of Murehwa District. In: Nyikahadzoi K, Mhlanga L (ed). Climate Change Impact, Adaptation and Mitigation in Zimbabwe; Case Studies from Zimbabwe’s Urban and Rural Areas (Zimbabwe), Harare, Conrad Adenauer Stiftung, p. 41–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Mataruse PT, Nyikahadzoi K, Fallot A. 2022. Smallholder farmers’ perceptions of the natural and anthropogenic drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A case study of Murehwa, Zimbabwe. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 78 : 207–216. [Google Scholar]
  • Matsa M, Muringaniza K. 2011. An assessment of the land use and land cover changes in Shurugwi district, Midlands Province, Zimbabwe. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management 4: 88–100. [Google Scholar]
  • Metzger MJ, Moseley, D, Sing L, Yang A, Coste L, Forrest E. 2021. A shared vision for sustainable regional land use in the Galloway and Ayrshire UNESCO Biosphere. [Google Scholar]
  • Miles L, Newton AC, DeFries RS, Ravilious C, May I, Blyth S et al. 2006. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. Journal of Biogeography 33: 491–505. [Google Scholar]
  • Nath DC, Mwchahary DD. 2012. Population increase and deforestation: a study in Kokrajhar district of Assam, India. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 2: 12. [Google Scholar]
  • Nikolakis W, Innes JL (ed). 2020. The wicked problem of forest policy: a multidisciplinary approach to sustainability in forest landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 43 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Nordman E. 2021. The uncommon knowledge of Elinor Ostrom: Essential lessons for collective action. Washington: Island Press, 29 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F. 2004. Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34: 75–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom E. 2010. Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics 41: 155–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Pennington RT, Lehmann CE, Rowland LM. 2018. Tropical savannas and dry forests. Current Biology 28: 541–545. [Google Scholar]
  • Perrotton A, Ba M, Delay E, Fallot A. 2021. ACARDI : gestion des sols agricoles et définition collective d’un futur désirable pour la zone de Diohine, Sénégal. In: Adaptation and resilience of agriculture in West Africa: agroecological innovations and integration of territories. Dakar, Sénégal, 23–26 November 2021, ISRA, IRD, CIRAD. [Google Scholar]
  • Quesada M, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Alvarez-Anorve M, Stoner KE, Avila-Cabadilla L, Calvo-Alvarado J et al. 2009. Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: Review and new perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management 258 : 1014–1024. [Google Scholar]
  • Rittel HW, Webber MM. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169. [Google Scholar]
  • Roberts N. 2000. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review 1: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Schröder JM, Rodríguez LPÁ, Günter S. 2021. Research trends: Tropical dry forests: The neglected research agenda? Forest Policy and Economics 122: 102333. [Google Scholar]
  • Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE, Buiten E, Bird N. 2007. The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 558–577. [Google Scholar]
  • Sheppard JP, Bohn Reckziegel R, Borrass L, Chirwa PW, Cuaranhua CJ, Hassler SK et al. 2020. Agroforestry: an appropriate and sustainable response to a changing climate in Southern Africa? Sustainability 12: 6796. [Google Scholar]
  • Sibanda S, Tsuyuki S. 2022. Identifying the rates and drivers of spatiotemporal patterns of land use and land cover changes in the Hurungwe District, Zimbabwe: A GIS and remote sensing approach. Journal of Geographic Information System 14 : 652–679. [Google Scholar]
  • Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed MS. 2006. Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11: 39. [Google Scholar]
  • Stroh DP. 2015. Systems thinking for social change: A practical guide to solving complex problems, avoiding unintended consequences, and achieving lasting results. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 56 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Trompette P, Vinck D. 2009. Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 3: 3–1. [Google Scholar]
  • Valentini R, Arneth A, Bombelli A, Castaldi S,Cazzolla Gatti R, et al. 2014. A full greenhouse gases budget of Africa: synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities. Biogeosciences 11: 381–407. [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt P, Riitters KH, Caudullo G, Eckhardt B. 2019. FAO-State of the World’s forests: forest fragmentation. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. [Google Scholar]
  • Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL. 2017. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press, 196 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.