| Issue |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 34, 2025
Réduire l’utilisation des pesticides agricoles dans les pays du Sud : verrous et leviers socio-techniques / Reducing the use of agricultural pesticides in Southern countries: socio-technical barriers and levers. Coordonnateurs : Ludovic Temple, Nathalie Jas, Fabrice Le Bellec, Jean-Noël Aubertot, Olivier Dangles, Jean-Philippe Deguine, Catherine Abadie, Eveline Compaore Sawadogo, François-Xavier Cote
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 17 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2025016 | |
| Published online | 27 May 2025 | |
- Abrami G, Daré W, Ducrot R, Salliou N, Bommel P. 2022. Participatory modelling. In : Biggs R, de Vos A, Preiser R, Clements H, Maciejewski K, Schlüter M, eds. The Routledge handbook of research methods for social-ecological systems. London (UK): Routledge, pp. 189–204. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021339-16. [Google Scholar]
- Adger N, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL. 2005. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change 15(2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beed F, Taguchi M, Telemans B, Kahane R, Le Bellec F, Sourisseau JM, et al. 2021. Fruits et légumes. Opportunités et défis pour la durabilité des petites exploitations agricoles. Rome (Italie) : FAO-Cirad, 212 p. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4173fr. [Google Scholar]
- Bendjebbar P, Fouilleux E. 2022. Exploring national trajectories of organic agriculture in Africa. Comparing Benin and Uganda. Journal of Rural Studies 89: 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Berthet ET, Barnaud C, Girard N, Labatut J, Martin G. 2016. How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59(2): 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Biénabe E. 2013. Towards biodiverse agricultural systems: Reflecting on the technological, social and institutional changes at stake. In : Cultivating Biodiversity to Transform Agriculture. Berlin (Germany): Springer Nature, pp. 221–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7984-6_7. [Google Scholar]
- Carlsson L, Berkes F. 2005. Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75(1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cerdan C, Biénabe E, David-Benz H, Lemeilleur S, Marie-Vivien D, Vagneron I, et al. 2019. What market dynamics for promoting an agroecological transition? In : Côte FX, et al., eds. The agroecological transition of agricultural systems in the Global South. Versailles (France): Collection Cirad-AFD Agricultures et défis du monde, Éditions Quae, pp. 271–291. https://www.quae-open.com/produit/114/9782759230570/the-agroecological-transition-of-agricultural-systems-in-the-global-south. [Google Scholar]
- Côte FX, Poirier-Magona E, Perret S, Roudier P, Rapidel B, Thirion MC. 2019. La transition agro-écologique des agricultures du Sud. Versailles (France): Éditions Quae. https://www.quae-open.com/produit/101/9782759228249/la-transition-agro-ecologique-des-agricultures-du-sud. [Google Scholar]
- De Bon H, Temple L, Malézieux E, Bendjebbar P, Fouilleux E, Silvie P. 2018. L’agriculture biologique en Afrique : un levier d’innovations pour le développement agricole. Perspective 48: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.19182/agritrop/00035. [Google Scholar]
- Deguine JP, Aubertot JN, Bellon S, Côte F, Lauri PE, Lescourret F, et al. 2023. Agroecological crop protection for sustainable agriculture. Advances in agronomy 178: 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2022.11.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Drabo E, Waongo A, Traoré F, Dabiré-Binso LC, Sanon A. 2022. Effectiveness of combining bioacaricides with sprinkler irrigation to control the red spider mite, Tetranychus evansi Baker and Pritchard (Acari: Tetranychidae), in irrigated tomato crops in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research 54(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/jear.2022.10055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fantke P. 2019. Modelling the environmental impacts of pesticides in agriculture. In : Assessing the environmental impact of agriculture. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, pp. 177–228. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2018.0044.08. [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca MF, Wilkinson J, Egelyng H, Mascarenhas G. 2008. The institutionalization of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) in Brazil: Organic and fair trade initiatives. 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress, Modena, Italy, 16-20 June. https://orgprints.dk/id/eprint/12356/1/Fonseca_12356_ed.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Gnago JA, Danho M, Agneroh TA, Fofana IK, Kohou AG. 2010. Efficacité des extraits de neem (Azadirachta indica) et de papayer (Carica papaya) dans la lutte contre les insectes ravageurs du gombo (Abelmoschus esculentus) et du chou (Brassica oleracea) en Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 4(4). https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v4i4.63035. [Google Scholar]
- IFOAM. 2008. One earth, many hands. IFOAM Annual Report. Bonn (Germany): International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, 16 p. https://www.organicseurope.bio/content/uploads/2021/04/ifoameu_comm_annual_report_2008.pdf?dd. [Google Scholar]
- Kamau JW, Stellmacher T, Biber-Freudenberger L, Borgemeister C. 2018. Organic and conventional agriculture in Kenya: A typology of smallholder farms in Kajiado and Murang’a counties. Journal of Rural Studies 57: 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lemeilleur S, Allaire G. 2018. Système participatif de garantie dans les labels du mouvement de l’agriculture biologique. Une réappropriation des communs intellectuels. Économie rurale 365: 7–27. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.5813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lemeilleur S, Dorville C, Niederle P, Ilbert H. 2022. Analyzing institutional changes in community-based management: A case study of a participatory guarantee system for organic labeling in Brazil. Journal of Institutional Economics 18(6): 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742200008X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Loconto A, Fouilleux E. 2019. Defining agroecology: Exploring the circulation of knowledge in FAO’s Global Dialogue. The International journal of sociology of agriculture and food 25(2): 116–137. [Google Scholar]
- Martin T, Assogba-Komlan F, Houndete T, Hougard JM, Chandre F. 2006. Efficacy of mosquito netting for sustainable small holders’ cabbage production in Africa. Journal of economic entomology 99(2): 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-99.2.450. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montefrio MJF, Johnson AT. 2019. Politics in participatory guarantee systems for organic food production. Journal of Rural Studies 65: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Niederle P. Loconto A, Lemeilleur S, Dorville C. 2020. Social movements and institutional change in organic food markets: Evidence from participatory guarantee systems in Brazil and France. Journal of Rural Studies 78: 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Silue D, Soro AN, Siata K. 2020. Risques sanitaires et nécessité de formation chez les maraîchères de Ferké en Côte d’Ivoire. Revue africaine des sciences sociales et de la santé publique 2(2): 57–71. [Google Scholar]
- Temple L, De Bon H. 2020. L’agriculture biologique : controverses et enjeux globaux de développement en Afrique. Cahiers Agricultures 29: 3. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020002. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C. 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development 29: 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.