Open Access
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 25, Number 4, Juillet-Août 2016
Article Number 45001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016027
Published online 19 August 2016
  • Ademe. 2014. Carbone organique des sols. L’énergie de l’agroécologie, une solution pour le climat, In: Eglin T, coord., Angers: Ademe Editions, 28p., ISBN: 978-2-358-38-447-6. [Google Scholar]
  • Andriulo A, Guerif J, Mary B. 1999. Modelling soil carbon dynamics with various cropping sequences on the rolling pampas. Agronomie 19 (5): 365– 377. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Arrouays D, Balesdents J, Germon J-C, Jayet P-A, Soussana J-F. 2002. Contribution à la lutte contre l’effet de serre. Stocker du carbone dans les sols agricoles en France ? Expertise scientifique collective, Synthèse, INRA, 32 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunnert H. 1996. The significance of agriculture and forestry for the global carbon cycle. How can they contribute to sequester increasing amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere. Berichte Uber Landwirtschaft 74 (1): 44– 65. [Google Scholar]
  • Currence HD, Lovely WG. 1970. The analysis of soil surface roughness. Trans. ASAE 13 (6): 710– 714. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferchaud F, Vitte G, Mary B. 2015. Changes in soil carbon stocks under perennial and annual bioenergy crops. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 8: 290– 306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Iqbal A, Aslam S, Alavoine G, Benoit P, Garnier P, Recous S. 2015. Rain regime and soil type affect the C and N dynamics in soil columns that are covered with mixed-species mulches. Plant Soil 393: 319– 334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MAAF. 2015. Contribution de l’agriculture à la lutte contre le changement climatique : Stéphane Le Foll annonce le lancement d’un projet de recherche international : le « 4 pour 1000 ». Communiqué de presse du 17 mars. Disponible sur http://agriculture.gouv.fr/contribution-de-lagriculture-la-lutte-contre-le-changement-climatique-lancement-dun-projet-de (dernière consultation le 14/04/2016). [Google Scholar]
  • Maltas A, Corbeels M, Scopel E, Wery J, da Silva FAM. 2009. Cover crop and nitrogen effects on maize productivity in no-tillage systems of the Brazilian cerrados. Agron. J. 101 (5): 1036– 1046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naudin K, Scopel E, Andriamandroso ALH, et al. 2011. Trade-offs between biomass use and soil cover. The case of rice-based cropping systems in the lake Alaotra region of Madagascar. Exp. Agric. 48 (2): 194– 209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Neto MS, Scopel E, Coorbeels M, et al. 2010. Soil carbon stocks under no-tillage mulch based cropping systems in the Brazilian cerrado: an on-farm synchronic assessment. Soil Tillage Res. 110 (1): 187– 195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oorst K, Merckx R, Grehan E, Labreuche J, Nicolardot B. 2007. Determinants of annual fluxes of CO2 and N2O in long-term no-tillage and conventional tillage systems in northern France. Soil Tillage Res. 95: 133– 148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pascault N, Nicolardot B, Bastian F, Thiébeau P, Ranjard L, Maron P-A. 2010. In situ dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of soil bacterial communities under different crop residue management. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 291– 303. [Google Scholar]
  • Ringselle B, Bergkvist G, Aronsson H, Andersson L. 2014. Under-grown-sown cover and post-harvest mowing as measures to control Elymus repens. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. 55: 309– 319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seguin B, Soussana J-F. 2006. Le réchauffement climatique (prédictions futures et observations récentes) en lien avec les émissions de GES. Fourrages 186: 139– 154. [Google Scholar]
  • Sinclair TH, Muchow RC. 1999. Radiation use efficiency. Adv. Agron. 65: 215– 265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Systat Software. 2010. SigmaPolt 12. Disponible sur https://systatsoftware.com/products/sigmaplot/sigmaplot-details.php (dernière consultation le 14/04/2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.