Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 26, Number 6, Novembre-Décembre 2017
Évaluer les impacts des recherches en agriculture sur la société : outils, méthodes, études de cas. Coordonnateurs : Ariane Gaunand, Ludovic Temple, Gilles Trouche
Article Number 65004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Études originales / Original studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017054
Published online 15 December 2017
  • Baca M, Läderach P, Haggar J, Schroth G, Ovalle O. 2014. An integrated framework for assessing vulnerability to climate change and developing adaptation strategies for coffee growing families in Mesoamerica. PLoS One 9(2): e88463. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088463. [CrossRef]
  • CIAT, UNDP. 2011. Evaluación de flujos de inversión y financiamiento para acciones de mitigación y adaptación en el Sector Agropecuario. Bogotá: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. http://www.undpcc.org/docs/Investment%20and%20Financial%20flows/Results%20flyers/Colombia/Colombia_Summary_sp.pdf.
  • Douthwaite B, Alvarez S, Cook S, Davies R, George P, Howell J, et al. 2007. Participatory impact pathways analysis: A practical application of program theory in research-for-development. Can J Progr Eval 22: 127–159.
  • Earl S, Carden F, Smutylo T. 2001. Outcome mapping: building learning and reflection into development programs. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
  • Gamble JAA. 2008. A Developmental Evaluation Primer. Montreal: The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation.
  • Horton D, Mackay R, 2003. Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: Recent experiences with agricultural research and development. Agric Syst 78: 127–142. [CrossRef]
  • Patton MQ. 1994. Developmental evaluation. Eval Pract 15: 311–319. [CrossRef]
  • Patton MQ. 2014. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Chicago: Sage Pubns.
  • Patton MQ, McKegg K, Wehipeihana N. 2016. Developmental evaluation exemplars. Principles in practice. New York: Gilford Publications.
  • Ramirez-Villegas J, Salazar M, Jarvis A, Navarro-Racines CE. 2012. A way forward on adaptation to climate change in Colombian agriculture: Perspectives towards 2050. Clim Change 115: 611–628. [CrossRef]
  • Schroth G, Läderach P, Martinez-Valle AI, Bunn C, Jassogne L. 2016. Vulnerability to climate change of cocoa in West Africa: Patterns, opportunities and limits to adaptation. Sci Total Environ 556: 231–241. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Schuetz T, Förch W, Thornton P, Vasileiou I. 2017. Pathway to impact: supporting and evaluating enabling environments for research for development. In: Uitto JI, Puri J, van den Berg RD, eds. Evaluating Climate Change for Sustainable Development. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Shenton AK. 2004. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf 22: 63–75.
  • Springer-Heinze A, Hartwich F, Simon Henderson J, Horton D, Minde I. 2003. Impact pathway analysis: An approach to strengthening the impact orientation of agricultural research. Agric Syst 78: 267–285. [CrossRef]
  • Thornton P, Schuetz T, Förch W, Cramer L, Abreu D, Vermeulen S, et al. 2017. Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based. Agric Syst 152: 145–153. [CrossRef]
  • Wilson-Grau R, Britt H. 2012. “Outcome Harvesting”. Cairo: Ford Foundation. http://www.managingforimpact.org/sites/default/files/resource/outome_harvesting_brief_final_2012-05-2-1.pdf.
  • World Bank. 2014a. Cases in Outcome Harvesting. D.C. Washington: The World Bank.
  • World Bank. 2014b. Low Carbon Development for Colombia. D.C. Washington: The World Bank.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.