Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 27, Number 1, Janvier-Février 2018
Évaluer les impacts des recherches en agriculture sur la société : outils, méthodes, études de cas. Coordonnateurs : Ariane Gaunand, Ludovic Temple, Gilles Trouche
Article Number 15012
Number of page(s) 9
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018006
Published online 20 February 2018
  • Aldrich DP. 2012. Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 232 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Casieri A, De Gennaro B, Medicamento U. 2008. Framework of economic institutions and governance of relationships inside a territorial supply chain: the case of organic olive oil in the Sierra de Segura (Andalusia). Cahiers Agricultures 17(6): 537–541. DOI: 10.1684/agr.2008.0245. [Google Scholar]
  • Coleman JS. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120. DOI: 10.1086/228943. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Freeman LC. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3): 215–239. DOI: 0.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gnyawali DR, Srivastava MK. 2013. Complementary effects of clusters and networks on firm innovation: a conceptual model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 30(1): 1–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.11.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haythornthwaite C. 1996. Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research 18(4): 323–342. DOI: 10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Joly PB, Gaunand A, Colinet L, Larédo P, Lemarié S, Matt M. 2015. ASIRPA: a comprehensive theory-based approach to assessing the societal impacts of a research organization. Research Evaluation 24(4): 440–453. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klerkx L, Hall A, Leeuwis C. 2009. Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8(5/6). DOI: 10.1504/IJARGE.2009.032643. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krugman PR. 1991. Geography and trade. Lauven: Leuven University Press, 142 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamine C, Meynard JM, Perrot N, Bellon S. 2009. Analyse des formes de transition vers des agricultures plus écologiques : les cas de l’agriculture biologique et de la protection intégrée. Innovations Agronomiques 4(4): 483–493. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahoney J. 2012. The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research 41(4): 570–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quiédeville S, Barjolle D, Mouret JC, Stolze M. 2017. Ex-post evaluation of the impacts of the science-based research and innovation program: a new method applied in the case of farmers’ transition to organic production in the Camargue. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management 22(1): 145–145. DOI: 10.3917/jie.022.0145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scott J. 2000. Social network analysis: a handbook. London: SAGE Publications, 86 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Temple L, Biénabe E, Barret D, Saint-Martin G. 2016. Methods for assessing the impact of research on innovation and development in the agriculture and food sectors. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development: 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2016.1219484. [Google Scholar]
  • Wasserman S, Faust K. 1994. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 852 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Yokura Y, Matsubara H, Sternberg R. 2013. R&D networks and regional innovation: a social network analysis of joint research projects in Japan. Area 45(4): 493–503. DOI: 10.1111/area.12055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.