The invisibility of young people in family farming: a gender perspective in the semi-arid region of Ceará, Brazil

Resilience of semi-arid rural socio-environmental systems - Crossed points of view from Brazil and Africa / Résilience des systèmes socio-environnementaux ruraux semi-arides - Regards croisés Brésil et Afrique. Coordonnateurs : Julien Burte, Eduardo SPR Martins, Marcel Kuper, Sami Bouarfa, Jean-Yves Jamin

Open Access

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 32, 2023 Resilience of semi-arid rural socio-environmental systems - Crossed points of view from Brazil and Africa / Résilience des systèmes socio-environnementaux ruraux semi-arides - Regards croisés Brésil et Afrique. Coordonnateurs : Julien Burte, Eduardo SPR Martins, Marcel Kuper, Sami Bouarfa, Jean-Yves Jamin


Article Number		6
Number of page(s)		9
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022035
Published online		30 January 2023

Amaral Filho J do. 2006. Território e inovação: o arranjo produtivo Pingo D́Água. Ciência e Cultura 58(1): 45–49. [Google Scholar]
Bosc PM, Sourisseau JM, Bonnal P, Gasselin P, Valette E, Bélières JF. 2015. Diversité des agricultures familiales : exister, se transformer, devenir. Versailles (France) : Quae, 387 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-2268-1. [Google Scholar]
Bossenbroek L, Ploeg J, Zwarteveen M. 2015. Broken dreams? Youth experiences of agrarian change in Morocco’s Saïss region. Cahiers Agricultures 24(6): 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2015.0776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bourdieu P. 1998. La domination masculine. Paris (France) : Seuil, coll. Liber, 134 p. [Google Scholar]
Brasil. 1996. Decreto n°1.946, de 28 de junho de 1996. [Google Scholar]
Brasil. 2013. Lei n°12.852, de 5 de agosto de 2013. [Google Scholar]
Brumer A. 2004. Gender and agriculture: the situation of women in agriculture in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. Estudos Femininos 12(1): 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026x2004000100011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Caitano R, Burte J, Sinfort C, Mamede G. 2015. Levantamento dos impactos socioambientais da irrigação segundo metodologia de diagnóstico sistêmico e participativo. In: III INOVAGRI International Meeting 2015. https://doi.org/10.12702/iii.inovagri.2015-a272. [Google Scholar]
Camarano A, Abramovay R. 1999. Êxodo Rural, Envelhecimento e Masculinização no Brasil: Panorama dos últimos 50 anos. Brasil: IPEA, 28 p. [Google Scholar]
Chambers R. 1981. Rapid rural appraisal: rationale and repertoire. Public Administration and Development 1: 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230010202. [Google Scholar]
Ceará. 2020. Observatório da Agricultura Familiar. As mulheres na agricultura familiar no Ceará. Boletim Eletrônico 2: 1–2. [Google Scholar]
Djurfeldt G. 1996. Defining and operationalizing family farming from a sociological perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 36(3): 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00026.x. [Google Scholar]
Gasmi H, Kuper M, Martins E, Morardet S, Burte J. 2022. Sustaining community-managed rural water supply systems in severe water-scarce areas in Brazil and Tunisia. Cahiers Agricultures 31: 21. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022019. [Google Scholar]
Gasson R, Errington A. 1993. The farm family business. Wallingford, Oxon (UK): Cab International, 304 p. [Google Scholar]
Grisa C, Wesz Junior V, Buchweitz V. 2014. Revisitando o Pronaf: velhos questionamentos, novas interpretações. Revista de Economia e Sociolgia Rural 52(2): 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032014000200007. [Google Scholar]
Herrera K. 2019. Rompendo dicotomias: o cotidiano do trabalho das mulheres rurais. Revista de Ciências Sociais e Econômicas 39(1): 63–79. https://doi.org/10.37370/raizes.2019.v39.82. [Google Scholar]
Hirata H, Kergoat D. 2007. Novas configurações da divisão sexual do trabalho. Cadernos de Pesquisa 37(132): 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742007000300005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Marin J. 2020. Pronaf Jovem: the disjunctions between the ideal and the real. Revista de Economia e Sociolgia Rural 58(2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2020.187438. [Google Scholar]
Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 280 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pierotti R, Friedson-Ridenour S, Olayiwola O. 2022. Women farm what they can manage: How time constraints affect the quantity and quality of labor for married women’s agricultural production in southwestern Nigeria. World Development 152: 105800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105800. [Google Scholar]
Rigotto R, Augusto L. 2007. Health and environment in Brazil: development, territory, and social iniquity. Cad Saúde Pública 23: 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311 ( 2007001600002. [Google Scholar]
Sabourin E, Craviotti C, Milhorance C. 2020. The dismantling of family farming policies in Brazil and Argentina. International Review of Public Policy 2(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.799. [Google Scholar]
Sen A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York (USA): Oxford University Press, 384 p. [Google Scholar]
Sousa M. 2009. Participative methods of planning in rural settlements: the rapid rural appraisal (RRA). Em extensão 8(1): 34–47. [Google Scholar]
Thirion MC (ed.), Bosc PM (ed.), Bélières JF, Bonnal P, Bosc PM, Losch B, et al. 2014. Les agricultures familiales du monde : définitions, contributions et politiques publiques. Paris (France) : AFD, 195 p. [Google Scholar]
United Nation. 2020. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Sustainable Development. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and young women. [Google Scholar]
Valadares A. 2022. Agricultura familiar no Brasil: um panorama de produção, do perfil e dos sinais de mudanças entre os censos agropecuários de 2006 e 2017. In: Santos G, Silva R, eds. Agricultura e Diversidades: trajetórias, desafíos regionais e políticas públicas no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): IPEA, pp. 149–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Valencia-Perafán M, Coq J, Favareto A, Samper M, Sáenz-Segura F, Sabourin E. 2020. Políticas públicas para o desenvolvimento territorial rural na América Latina: equilíbrio e perspectivas. Eutopia 17: 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17141/eutopia.17.2020.4388. [Google Scholar]
Vidal D. 2013. Work division in family farm production units: Feminine responsibilities typology in a semi-arid region of Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments 97: 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.07.001. [Google Scholar]
Waltz A. 2016. The women who feed us: Gender empowerment (or lack thereof) in rural Southern Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies 47: Part A 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.009. [Google Scholar]
Whatmore S. 1991. Life cycle or patriarchy? Gender divisions in family farming. Journal of Rural Studies 7(112): 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(91)90043-R. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.