Numéro |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 32, 2023
Resilience of semi-arid rural socio-environmental systems - Crossed points of view from Brazil and Africa / Résilience des systèmes socio-environnementaux ruraux semi-arides - Regards croisés Brésil et Afrique. Coordonnateurs : Julien Burte, Eduardo SPR Martins, Marcel Kuper, Sami Bouarfa, Jean-Yves Jamin
|
|
---|---|---|
Numéro d'article | 6 | |
Nombre de pages | 9 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022035 | |
Publié en ligne | 30 janvier 2023 |
- Amaral Filho J do. 2006. Território e inovação: o arranjo produtivo Pingo D́Água. Ciência e Cultura 58(1): 45–49. [Google Scholar]
- Bosc PM, Sourisseau JM, Bonnal P, Gasselin P, Valette E, Bélières JF. 2015. Diversité des agricultures familiales : exister, se transformer, devenir. Versailles (France) : Quae, 387 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-2268-1. [Google Scholar]
- Bossenbroek L, Ploeg J, Zwarteveen M. 2015. Broken dreams? Youth experiences of agrarian change in Morocco’s Saïss region. Cahiers Agricultures 24(6): 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2015.0776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bourdieu P. 1998. La domination masculine. Paris (France) : Seuil, coll. Liber, 134 p. [Google Scholar]
- Brasil. 1996. Decreto n°1.946, de 28 de junho de 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Brasil. 2013. Lei n°12.852, de 5 de agosto de 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Brumer A. 2004. Gender and agriculture: the situation of women in agriculture in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. Estudos Femininos 12(1): 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026x2004000100011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Caitano R, Burte J, Sinfort C, Mamede G. 2015. Levantamento dos impactos socioambientais da irrigação segundo metodologia de diagnóstico sistêmico e participativo. In: III INOVAGRI International Meeting 2015. https://doi.org/10.12702/iii.inovagri.2015-a272. [Google Scholar]
- Camarano A, Abramovay R. 1999. Êxodo Rural, Envelhecimento e Masculinização no Brasil: Panorama dos últimos 50 anos. Brasil: IPEA, 28 p. [Google Scholar]
- Chambers R. 1981. Rapid rural appraisal: rationale and repertoire. Public Administration and Development 1: 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230010202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ceará. 2020. Observatório da Agricultura Familiar. As mulheres na agricultura familiar no Ceará. Boletim Eletrônico 2: 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Djurfeldt G. 1996. Defining and operationalizing family farming from a sociological perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 36(3): 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00026.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gasmi H, Kuper M, Martins E, Morardet S, Burte J. 2022. Sustaining community-managed rural water supply systems in severe water-scarce areas in Brazil and Tunisia. Cahiers Agricultures 31: 21. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022019. [Google Scholar]
- Gasson R, Errington A. 1993. The farm family business. Wallingford, Oxon (UK): Cab International, 304 p. [Google Scholar]
- Grisa C, Wesz Junior V, Buchweitz V. 2014. Revisitando o Pronaf: velhos questionamentos, novas interpretações. Revista de Economia e Sociolgia Rural 52(2): 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032014000200007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Herrera K. 2019. Rompendo dicotomias: o cotidiano do trabalho das mulheres rurais. Revista de Ciências Sociais e Econômicas 39(1): 63–79. https://doi.org/10.37370/raizes.2019.v39.82. [Google Scholar]
- Hirata H, Kergoat D. 2007. Novas configurações da divisão sexual do trabalho. Cadernos de Pesquisa 37(132): 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742007000300005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Marin J. 2020. Pronaf Jovem: the disjunctions between the ideal and the real. Revista de Economia e Sociolgia Rural 58(2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2020.187438. [Google Scholar]
- Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 280 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pierotti R, Friedson-Ridenour S, Olayiwola O. 2022. Women farm what they can manage: How time constraints affect the quantity and quality of labor for married women’s agricultural production in southwestern Nigeria. World Development 152: 105800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105800. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rigotto R, Augusto L. 2007. Health and environment in Brazil: development, territory, and social iniquity. Cad Saúde Pública 23: 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311 ( 2007001600002. [Google Scholar]
- Sabourin E, Craviotti C, Milhorance C. 2020. The dismantling of family farming policies in Brazil and Argentina. International Review of Public Policy 2(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.799. [Google Scholar]
- Sen A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York (USA): Oxford University Press, 384 p. [Google Scholar]
- Sousa M. 2009. Participative methods of planning in rural settlements: the rapid rural appraisal (RRA). Em extensão 8(1): 34–47. [Google Scholar]
- Thirion MC (ed.), Bosc PM (ed.), Bélières JF, Bonnal P, Bosc PM, Losch B, et al. 2014. Les agricultures familiales du monde : définitions, contributions et politiques publiques. Paris (France) : AFD, 195 p. [Google Scholar]
- United Nation. 2020. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Sustainable Development. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and young women. [Google Scholar]
- Valadares A. 2022. Agricultura familiar no Brasil: um panorama de produção, do perfil e dos sinais de mudanças entre os censos agropecuários de 2006 e 2017. In: Santos G, Silva R, eds. Agricultura e Diversidades: trajetórias, desafíos regionais e políticas públicas no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): IPEA, pp. 149–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Valencia-Perafán M, Coq J, Favareto A, Samper M, Sáenz-Segura F, Sabourin E. 2020. Políticas públicas para o desenvolvimento territorial rural na América Latina: equilíbrio e perspectivas. Eutopia 17: 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17141/eutopia.17.2020.4388. [Google Scholar]
- Vidal D. 2013. Work division in family farm production units: Feminine responsibilities typology in a semi-arid region of Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments 97: 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.07.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Waltz A. 2016. The women who feed us: Gender empowerment (or lack thereof) in rural Southern Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies 47: Part A 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Whatmore S. 1991. Life cycle or patriarchy? Gender divisions in family farming. Journal of Rural Studies 7(112): 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(91)90043-R. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.