Co-conception avec les producteurs de stratégies d’adaptation au changement climatique : le cas des exploitations agricoles en Haïti

Open Access

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 32, 2023


Article Number		27
Number of page(s)		10
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2023020
Published online		26 October 2023

Andrieu N, Howland F, Acosta-Alba I, Le Coq JF, Osorio-Garcia AM, Chia E, et al. 2019. Co-designing climate-smart farming systems with local stakeholders: A methodological framework for achieving large-scale change. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3: 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Andrieu N, Blundo Canto G, Chia E, Diman JL, Dugue P, Fanchone A, et al. 2022. Scenarios for an agroecological transition of smallholder family farmers: A case study in Guadeloupe. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 42: 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00828-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barnett J, O’Neill S. 2010. Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change 20(2): 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Descheemaeker K, Ronner E, Ollenburger M, Franke AC, Klapwijk CJ, Falconnier GN, et al. 2019. Which options fit best? Operationalizing the socio-ecological niche concept. Experimental Agriculture 55(1): 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971600048X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Eckstein D, Künzel V, Schäfer L. 2021. Global Climate Risk Index 2021. German Watch, Bonn, Germany, 52 p. [Google Scholar]
Garcia FHS, Rodrigues M, Pennacchi JP, et al. 2021. Sugarcane resilience to recurrent water deficit is dependent on the systemic acclimation of leaf physiological traits. Tropical Plant Biology 14: 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-021-09303-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
GIEC. 2018. Annexe I : Glossaire. In: Matthews J.B.R., éd. Réchauffement planétaire de 1,5 °C, Rapport spécial du GIEC sur les conséquences d’un réchauffement planétaire de 1,5 °C par rapport aux niveaux préindustriels et les trajectoires associées d’émissions mondiales de gaz à effet de serre, dans le contexte du renforcement de la parade mondiale au changement climatique, du développement durable et de la lutte contre la pauvreté [Publié sous la direction de V Masson -Delmotte, P Zhai, HO Pörtner, D Roberts, J Skea, PR Shukla, A Pirani, W Moufouma-Okia, C Péan, R Pidcock, S Connors, JBR Matthews, Y Chen, X Zhou, MI Gomis, E Lonnoy, T Maycock, M Tignor et T Waterfield]. Genève, Suisse : Organisation météorologique mondiale, 32 p. [Google Scholar]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006. IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. [2021/03/09]. Disponible sur : https://www.ipcc.ch/report/2006-ipcc-guidelines-for-nationalgreenhouse-gasinventories. [Google Scholar]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021a. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896. [Google Scholar]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021b. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–32, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.001. [Google Scholar]
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [HO Pörtner, DC Roberts, M Tignor, ES Poloczanska, K Mintenbeck, A Alegría, M Craig, S Langsdorf, S Löschke, V Möller, A Okem, B Rama, eds. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 3056 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844. [Google Scholar]
Jeuffroy MH, Loyce C, Lefeuvre T, Valantin-Morison M, Colnenne-David C, Gauffreteau A, et al. 2022. Design workshops for innovative cropping systems and decision-support tools: Learning from 12 case studies. European Journal of Agronomy 139: 126573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Le Gal PY, Dugué P, Faure G, Novak S. 2011. How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review. Agricultural Systems 104: 714–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.07.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Magnan A. 2013. Éviter la maladaptation au changement climatique. IDDRI Policy Brief 8: 4 p. [Google Scholar]
Meynard JM, Dedieu B, Bos AP. 2012. Re-design and co-design of farming systems. An overview of methods and practices. In: Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B, éds. Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ministère de l’Agriculture, des ressources naturelles et du développement rural (MARNDR). 2012. Synthèse nationale des résultats du recensement général de l’agriculture (RGA) 2008/2009. Port–au–Prince, Haïti, 218 p. [Google Scholar]
Naulleau A, Gary C, Prévot L, Vinatier F, Hossard L. 2022. How can winegrowers adapt to climate change? A participatory modeling approach in southern France. Agricultural Systems 203: 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Osorio-García AM, Paz L, Howland F, Ortega LA, Chia E, Andrieu N, et al. 2020. Can an innovation platform support a local process of climate-smart agriculture implementation? A case study in Cauca, Colombia. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44(3): 378–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2019.1629373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Paul B, Fréguin-Gresh S, Marzin J, Pressoir, et al. 2021. Diagnostic agro socio-économique de la commune de Saint Michel de l’Attalaye. Port-au-Prince, Haïti, CHIBAS-UNIQ-CIRAD/MARNDR, 187 p. [Google Scholar]
Périnelle A, Meynard JM, Scopel E. 2021. Combining on-farm innovation tracking and participatory prototyping trials to develop legume-based cropping systems in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 187: 102978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102978. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rasse C. 2017. Construction d’un outil de modélisation de la Petite agriculture familiale agroécologique de Guadeloupe : tensions et synergies entre productivité et services écosystémiques. Mémoire de fin d’études. Inra, Antilles-Guyane, 122 p. [Google Scholar]
Schaap BF, Reidsma P, Verhagen J, Wolf J, Van Ittersum MK. 2013. Participatory design of farm level adaptation to climate risks in an arable region in The Netherlands. European Journal of Agronomy 48: 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.02.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Vervoort JM, Thornton PK, Kristjanson P, Förch W, Ericksen PJ, Kok K, et al. 2014. Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change. Global Environmental Change 28: 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Climate data. 2021. Climat Saint-Michel-de-l’Attalaye (Haïti). [2021/03/10]. Disponible sur : https://fr.climate-data.org/amerique-du-nord/haiti/artibonite-department/saint-michel-de-l-attalaye-48360/. [Google Scholar]
USDA-Food Data Central. Sans date. Disponible sur : https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/. [Google Scholar]
Institut Haïtien de Statistique et d’Informatique (IHSI). 2009. Projection de la population par la section communale de 2009. [2021/12/11]. Disponible sur : https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/fr/operations/haiti/document/projection-de-la-population-par-la-section-communale-de-2009-ihsi et Données sur l’inflation en Haïti. [2023/02/01]. Disponible sur : https://ihsi.gouv.ht/. [Google Scholar]
Sous-structure agricole et informatique du MARNDR. 2022. [17/09/2022]. Disponible sur : www.agriculture.gouv.ht/statistique_agricole. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.