| Numéro |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 26, Numéro 6, Novembre-Décembre 2017
Évaluer les impacts des recherches en agriculture sur la société : outils, méthodes, études de cas. Coordonnateurs : Ariane Gaunand, Ludovic Temple, Gilles Trouche
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 65006 | |
| Nombre de pages | 10 | |
| Section | Études originales / Original Studies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017056 | |
| Publié en ligne | 21 décembre 2017 | |
- Almeida C, Báscolo E. 2006. Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 22: S7–S19. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-311X2006001300002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold E, Clark J, Muscio A. 2005. What the evaluation record tells us about European Union Framework Programme performance. Science and Public Policy 32: 385–397. DOI: 10.3152/147154305781779335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barret D, Blundo-Canto G, Dabat MH, Devaux-Spatarakis A, Faure G, Hainzelin E, et al. 2017 : IMPRESS (IMPact des REchercheS au Sud). Guide méthodologique sur l’évaluation des impacts de la recherche agronomique dans les pays du sud. CIRAD, Montpellier. Disponible sur http://agritrop.cirad.fr/586223. [Google Scholar]
- Boaz A, Fitzpatrick S, Shaw B. 2009. Assessing the impact of research on policy: a literature review. Science and Public Policy 36: 255–270. DOI: 10.3152/030234209X436545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bornmann L. 2013. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64: 217–233. DOI: 10.1002/asi.22803. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bozeman B, Melkers J. 1993. Evaluating R&D impacts: methods and practice. New-York: Springer Science + Business Media, 303 p. [Google Scholar]
- Bozeman B, Youtie J. 2015. Socio-economic impacts and public value of government-funded research: lessons from four US National Science Foundation initiatives. Presented at the ImpAR Conference. INRA : Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
- Chevalier JM, Buckles D. 2013. Participatory action research: theory and methods for engaged inquiry. New-York: Routledge, 474 p. [Google Scholar]
- Donovan C, Hanney S. 2011. The “Payback Framework” explained. Research Evaluation 20: 181–183. DOI: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635756. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gaunand A, Colinet L, Joly PB, Matt M. 2017. Counting what really counts? Assessing the political impact of science. Journal of Technology Transfer. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-017-9605-9. [Google Scholar]
- Georghiou L, Roesner D. 2000. Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods. Research Policy 29: 657–678. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00094-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hazell P, Slade R. 2014. Policy Research: the search for impact. In: Workshop on best practice methods for assessing the impact of policy-oriented research: summary and recommendations for the CGIAR, Independant Impact Assessment Report. Washington D.C. [Google Scholar]
- Joly PB, Colinet L, Gaunand A, Lemarié S, Laredo P, Matt M. 2015a. Évaluer l'impact sociétal de la recherche pour apprendre à le gérer : l'approche ASIRPA et l'exemple de la recherche agronomique. Gérer et Comprendre – Les Annales des Mines. L'épreuve des faits 122: 31–42. [Google Scholar]
- Joly PB, Gaunand A, Colinet L, Larédo P, Lemarié S, Matt M. 2015b. ASIRPA: a comprehensive theory-based approach to assessing the societal impacts of a research organization. Research Evaluation 24: 1–14. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kingdon J. 1984. Bridging research and policy: agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New-York: Harper Collins. ed. New-York: Longman. [Google Scholar]
- Langfeldt L. 2004. Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of bias. Research Evaluation 13: 51–62. DOI: /10.3152/147154404781776536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Matt M, Gaunand A, Joly PB, Colinet L. 2017. Opening the black box of impact – Ideal-type impact pathways in a public agricultural research organization. Research Policy 46: 207–218. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Molas-Gallart J, Davies A. 2006. Toward theory-led evaluation: the experience of European Science, Technology, and Innovation policies. American Journal of Evaluation 27: 64–82. DOI: 10.1177/1098214005281701. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Renkow M, Byerlee D. 2014. Assessing the impact of policy-oriented research: a stocktaking. In: Workshop on best practice methods for assessing the impact of policy-oriented research: summary and recommendations for the CGIAR, Independant Impact Assessment Report. Washington D.C. [Google Scholar]
- Ruegg R, Feller I. 2003. A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: models, methods, and findings from ATP's first decade. (Grant/Contract Report). Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology. [Google Scholar]
- Salter AJ, Martin BR. 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy 30: 509–532. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Samuel GN, Derrick GE. 2015. Societal impact evaluation: exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014. Research Evaluation 24(3): 229–241. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Spaapen JM, Van Drooge L. 2011. Introducing “productive interactions” in social assessment. Research Evaluation 20(3): 211–218. DOI: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876742. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wooding S, Hanney SR, Pollitt A, Grant J, Buxton MJ, on behalf of the Project Retrosight Team. 2014. Understanding factors associated with the translation of cardiovascular research: a multinational case study approach. Implementation Science 9: 47. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.