Open Access
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 25, Number 2, Mars-Avril 2016
Article Number 25004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016013
Published online 30 March 2016
  • Baranzini A, Ramirez J, Schaerer C, Thalmann P. 2008. Hedonic methods in housing markets. In: Pricing environmental amenities and segregation. New York (USA): Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, ISBN 978-0-387-76814-4. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76815-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bastian CT, McLeod DM, Germino MJ, Reiners WA, Blasko BJ. 2002. Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data. Ecol. Econ. 40: 337– 349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cebula RJ. 2009. The Hedonic Pricing Model applied to the housing market of the City of Savannah and its Savannah Historic Landmark District. Rev. Reg. Stud. 39 (1): 9– 22. [Google Scholar]
  • Combris P, Lecocq S, Visser M. 1997. Estimation of a hedonic price equation for Bordeaux wine: does quality matter? Econ. J. 107: 390– 402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cotteleer G, Stobbe T, van Kooten GC. 2007. Farmland conservation in The Netherlands and British Columbia, Canada: a comparative analysis using GIS-based Hedonic Pricing Models. Resource Economics and Policy Analysis (REPA) Research Group. [Google Scholar]
  • Council Regulation (EC) No. 1257/99 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations, European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • CSO. 2008. Central Statistical Office. [Google Scholar]
  • Flinn KM, Vellend M, Marks PL. 2005. Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA. J. Biogeogr. 32 (3): 39– 452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khalid H. 2015. Spatial heterogeneity and spatial bias analyses in hedonic price models: some practical considerations. In: Szymańska D, Chodkowska-Miszczuk J, eds. Bulletin of geography. Socio-economic series, No. 28. Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University, pp. 113–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015-0019. [Google Scholar]
  • Kolbe J, Wüstemann H. 2015. Estimating the value of urban green space: a hedonic pricing analysis of the housing market in Cologne, Germany. SFB 649 discussion paper 2015-002, ISSN 1860-5664. [Google Scholar]
  • Koreleski K. 2006. Wstępna ocena wpływu lasów i zadrzewień na wartość gruntów rolnych. Preliminary assessment of forests and tree-plantings influence on the arable lands value. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2 (1/1): 5– 14, in Polish. [Google Scholar]
  • Latruffe L, Le Mouël C. 2006. How and to what extent support to agriculture affect farmland markets and prices: a literature review. Report for the OECD, Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, 27 March 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • Latruffe L, Doucha T, Le Mouël C, Medonos T, Voltr V. 2008. Capitalisation of the government support in agricultural land prices in the Czech Republic. Agric. Econ. Czech. 54 (10): 451– 460. [Google Scholar]
  • Malpezzi S. 2003. Hedonic Pricing Models: a selective and applied review. J. Hous. Econ. 02 (05): 67– 89. [Google Scholar]
  • Marks-Bielska R. 2013. Factors shaping the agricultural land market in Poland. Land Use Policy 30 (1): 791– 799. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. 2013. Appendix D. Reason for delimitation and the level of financial support for the operation Fri. Support for farming in areas with less favored areas (LFAs), in Polish. [Google Scholar]
  • Nickerson C, Morehart M, Kuethe T, Beckman J, Ifft J, Williams R. 2012. Trends in U.S. Farmland Values and Ownership. EIB-92. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Econ. Res. Serv. 92: 1– 48. [Google Scholar]
  • Nurm K. 2015. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Land grabbing - a warning for Europe and a threat to family farming’. Off. J. Eur. Union C 242/15. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82 (1): 34– 55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh AS, Masuku MB. 2014. Normality and data transformation for applied statistical analysis. Int. J. Econ. Commer. Manag. UK II (7): 1– 11. ISSN 2348 0386. [Google Scholar]
  • Sopranzetti BJ. 2010. Hedonic regression analysis in real estate markets: a primer. In: Handbook of quantitive finance and risk management. Theory, methodology and applications. New York (USA): Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, pp. 1201– 1207. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77117-5_78. [Google Scholar]
  • Střeleček F, Lososová J, Zdeněk R. 2010. The relations between the rent and price of agricultural land in the EU countries. Agric. Econ. Czech. 56 (12): 558– 568. [Google Scholar]
  • Wen H, Jia S, Guo X. 2005. Hedonic price analysis of urban housing: an empirical research on Hangzhou, China. J. Zhejiang Univ. 6 (8): 907– 914. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woch F, Wierzbicki K, Eymont A, Dziadkowicz-Ilkowska A, Syp A, Kopiński J, et al. 2011. Economic viability and economic land consolidation in Poland. Puławy: Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, in Polish. [Google Scholar]
  • Źróbek S. 2014. Market analysis and management of real estate. Polish Real Estate Scientific Society, pp. 59–73. ISBN 978-83-61564-80-5. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.