Open Access
Cah. Agric.
Volume 26, Number 3, Mai-Juin 2017
Article Number 36001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Options / Options
Published online 12 May 2017
  • Altieri MA. 2009. Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review 61(3): 102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bawden R. 2006. A systemic evaluation of an agricultural development: a focus on the worldview challenge. Systems concepts in evaluation. Point Reys, CA: Edge Press of Inverness, pp. 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck DE, Cowan C. 2014. Spiral dynamics: mastering values, leadership and change. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Beddoe R, Costanza R, Farley J, Garza E, Kent J, Kubiszewski I, et al. 2009. Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(8): 2483–2489. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boltanski L, Thévenot L. 1991. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris : Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  • Boserup E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth. The economics of agriculture under population pressure. London and New York: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Buchanan J. 2013. An integral approach to agroecological research. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin (Madison). [Google Scholar]
  • Brown B. 2005. Theory and practice of integral sustainable development. AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice 1(2): 2–39. [Google Scholar]
  • CGIAR Consortium. 2015. CGIAR strategy and results framework 2016–2030: overview. [Google Scholar]
  • Conway G. 1999. The doubly green revolution: food for all in the twenty-first century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Cox TE. 2014. Integral agriculture: taking seriously the mindset of the farmer, the interiority of the beings on the farm, and a metaphysics that connects them. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University. [Google Scholar]
  • Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B. 2012. Farming systems research: an approach to inquiry. In: Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 3–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Esbjörn-Hargens S. 2010. An overview of integral theory: an all-inclusive framework for the 21st century (resource paper No. 1). Boulder, CO: Integral Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferguson RS, Lovell ST. 2014. Permaculture for agroecology: design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34(2): 251–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fournier S, Touzard JM. 2014. La complexité des systèmes alimentaires : un atout pour la sécurité alimentaire ? VertigO − la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement 14(1). [Google Scholar]
  • Gidley JM. 2013. Global knowledge futures: articulating the emergence of a new meta-level field. Integral Review 9(2): 145–172. [Google Scholar]
  • Hatt S, Artru S, Brédart D, Lassois L, Francis F, Haubruge E, et al. 2016. Towards sustainable food systems: the concept of agroecology and how it questions current research practices. A review. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment 20(S1): 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Hedlund-de Witt A. 2013. Worldviews and the transformation to sustainable societies: an exploration of the cultural and psychological dimensions of our global environmental challenges. Doctoral dissertation, Vrieje University (Amsterdam, the Netherlands). [Google Scholar]
  • Hubert B, Goulet F, Magnani S, Tallon H, Huguenin J. 2013. Agriculture, modèles productifs et options technologiques : orientations et débats. Natures Sciences Sociétés 21(1): 71–76. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme M. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Inra. 2010. Document d'orientation. Inra 2010–2020. Une science pour l'impact. [Google Scholar]
  • Issac H, Poyat M. 2015. Les défis de l'agriculture numérique connectée dans une société numérique. 16 propositions pour repenser la production, la distribution et la consommation alimentaires à l'ère du numérique. Reconnaissance numérique, 103 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson KA, Hill ED, Cohen AB. 2011. Integrating the study of culture and religion: toward a psychology of worldview. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5(3): 137–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordan NR, Bawden RJ, Bergmann L. 2008. Pedagogy for addressing the worldview challenge in sustainable development of agriculture. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 37: 92–99 [Google Scholar]
  • Mazoyer M, Roudart L. 1997. Histoire des agricultures du monde : du néolithique à la crise contemporaine. Paris : Éditions du Seuil, 545 p. [Google Scholar]
  • McIntyre BD. 2009. International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD): global report. [Google Scholar]
  • Mendras H. 1970. La fin des paysans : changement et innovations dans les sociétés rurales françaises. Colin, vol. 110. [Google Scholar]
  • Morin E. 2008. La méthode. Paris : Seuil, coll. « Opus », 2 volumes. [Google Scholar]
  • Naugle DK. 2002. Worldview: the history of a concept. UK: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard RB. 1988. Sustainable development: a co-evolutionary view. Futures 20(6): 606–620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Brien K, Hochachka G. 2010. Integral adaptation to climate change. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice 5(1): 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Rabhi P. 2009. Vers la sobriété heureuse. Arles : Actes Sud, 144 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanford AW. 2011. Ethics, narrative, and agriculture: transforming agricultural practice through ecological imagination. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24: 283–303. doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9246-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schösler H, Hedlund-de Witt A. 2012. Sustainable protein consumption and cultural innovation. What businesses, organizations, and governments can learn from sustainable food trends in Europe and the United States. Amsterdam: Reprografie. [Google Scholar]
  • Sevilla Guzmán E, Woodgate G. 2013. Agroecology: foundations in agrarian social thought and sociological theory. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37(1): 32–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Sire JW. 2015. Naming the elephant: worldview as a concept. USA: InterVarsity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(50): 20260–20264. [Google Scholar]
  • van Egmond ND, de Vries HJM. 2011. Sustainability: the search for the integral worldview. Futures 43(8): 853–867. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van der Ploeg JD. 2009. The new peasantries: struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. UK: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilber K. 2000. Sex, ecology, spirituality. Colorado: Shambhala Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilkinson J. 2009. The globalization of agribusiness and developing world food systems. Monthly Review 61(4): 38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.