Open Access
Article d'opinion / Opinion Article
Numéro
Cah. Agric.
Volume 26, Numéro 3, Mai-Juin 2017
Numéro d'article 36001
Nombre de pages 7
Section Options / Options
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017015
Publié en ligne 12 mai 2017
  • Altieri MA. 2009. Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review 61(3): 102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bawden R. 2006. A systemic evaluation of an agricultural development: a focus on the worldview challenge. Systems concepts in evaluation. Point Reys, CA: Edge Press of Inverness, pp. 35–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck DE, Cowan C. 2014. Spiral dynamics: mastering values, leadership and change. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Beddoe R, Costanza R, Farley J, Garza E, Kent J, Kubiszewski I, et al. 2009. Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(8): 2483–2489. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boltanski L, Thévenot L. 1991. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris : Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  • Boserup E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth. The economics of agriculture under population pressure. London and New York: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 124 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Buchanan J. 2013. An integral approach to agroecological research. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin (Madison). [Google Scholar]
  • Brown B. 2005. Theory and practice of integral sustainable development. AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice 1(2): 2–39. [Google Scholar]
  • CGIAR Consortium. 2015. CGIAR strategy and results framework 2016–2030: overview. [Google Scholar]
  • Conway G. 1999. The doubly green revolution: food for all in the twenty-first century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Cox TE. 2014. Integral agriculture: taking seriously the mindset of the farmer, the interiority of the beings on the farm, and a metaphysics that connects them. Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University. [Google Scholar]
  • Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B. 2012. Farming systems research: an approach to inquiry. In: Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 3–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Esbjörn-Hargens S. 2010. An overview of integral theory: an all-inclusive framework for the 21st century (resource paper No. 1). Boulder, CO: Integral Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferguson RS, Lovell ST. 2014. Permaculture for agroecology: design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34(2): 251–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fournier S, Touzard JM. 2014. La complexité des systèmes alimentaires : un atout pour la sécurité alimentaire ? VertigO − la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement 14(1). [Google Scholar]
  • Gidley JM. 2013. Global knowledge futures: articulating the emergence of a new meta-level field. Integral Review 9(2): 145–172. [Google Scholar]
  • Hatt S, Artru S, Brédart D, Lassois L, Francis F, Haubruge E, et al. 2016. Towards sustainable food systems: the concept of agroecology and how it questions current research practices. A review. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment 20(S1): 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  • Hedlund-de Witt A. 2013. Worldviews and the transformation to sustainable societies: an exploration of the cultural and psychological dimensions of our global environmental challenges. Doctoral dissertation, Vrieje University (Amsterdam, the Netherlands). [Google Scholar]
  • Hubert B, Goulet F, Magnani S, Tallon H, Huguenin J. 2013. Agriculture, modèles productifs et options technologiques : orientations et débats. Natures Sciences Sociétés 21(1): 71–76. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Hulme M. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Inra. 2010. Document d'orientation. Inra 2010–2020. Une science pour l'impact. [Google Scholar]
  • Issac H, Poyat M. 2015. Les défis de l'agriculture numérique connectée dans une société numérique. 16 propositions pour repenser la production, la distribution et la consommation alimentaires à l'ère du numérique. Reconnaissance numérique, 103 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson KA, Hill ED, Cohen AB. 2011. Integrating the study of culture and religion: toward a psychology of worldview. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5(3): 137–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordan NR, Bawden RJ, Bergmann L. 2008. Pedagogy for addressing the worldview challenge in sustainable development of agriculture. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 37: 92–99 [Google Scholar]
  • Mazoyer M, Roudart L. 1997. Histoire des agricultures du monde : du néolithique à la crise contemporaine. Paris : Éditions du Seuil, 545 p. [Google Scholar]
  • McIntyre BD. 2009. International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD): global report. [Google Scholar]
  • Mendras H. 1970. La fin des paysans : changement et innovations dans les sociétés rurales françaises. Colin, vol. 110. [Google Scholar]
  • Morin E. 2008. La méthode. Paris : Seuil, coll. « Opus », 2 volumes. [Google Scholar]
  • Naugle DK. 2002. Worldview: the history of a concept. UK: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard RB. 1988. Sustainable development: a co-evolutionary view. Futures 20(6): 606–620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Brien K, Hochachka G. 2010. Integral adaptation to climate change. Journal of Integral Theory and Practice 5(1): 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Rabhi P. 2009. Vers la sobriété heureuse. Arles : Actes Sud, 144 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanford AW. 2011. Ethics, narrative, and agriculture: transforming agricultural practice through ecological imagination. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24: 283–303. doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9246-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schösler H, Hedlund-de Witt A. 2012. Sustainable protein consumption and cultural innovation. What businesses, organizations, and governments can learn from sustainable food trends in Europe and the United States. Amsterdam: Reprografie. [Google Scholar]
  • Sevilla Guzmán E, Woodgate G. 2013. Agroecology: foundations in agrarian social thought and sociological theory. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37(1): 32–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Sire JW. 2015. Naming the elephant: worldview as a concept. USA: InterVarsity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(50): 20260–20264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van Egmond ND, de Vries HJM. 2011. Sustainability: the search for the integral worldview. Futures 43(8): 853–867. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van der Ploeg JD. 2009. The new peasantries: struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. UK: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilber K. 2000. Sex, ecology, spirituality. Colorado: Shambhala Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilkinson J. 2009. The globalization of agribusiness and developing world food systems. Monthly Review 61(4): 38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.