EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 26 / No 4 (Juillet-Août 2017) Cah. Agric., 26 4 (2017) 45004 References
Open Access
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 26, Number 4, Juillet-Août 2017
Article Number 45004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017022
Published online 25 August 2017
  • Agre AP, Kouchade S, Odjo T, Dansi M, Nzobadila B, Assogba P, et al. 2015. Diversité et évaluation participative des cultivars du manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) au Centre Bénin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 9(1): 388–408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Altieri MA. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 74(1): 19–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Boster JS. 1986. Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist 88(2): 428–436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Caillon S, Lanouguère-Bruneau V. 2005. Gestion de l'agrobiodiversité dans un village de Vanua Lava (Vanuatu) : stratégies de sélection et enjeux sociaux. Journal de la Société des Océanistes 120–121(1): 129–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Chaudhary P, Gauchan D, Rana RB, Sthapit BR, Jarvis DI. 2004. Potential loss of rice landraces from a Terai community in Nepal: a case study from Kachorwa, Bara. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 137(1): 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Coomes OT, McGuire SJ, Garine E, Caillon S, McKey D, Demeulenaere E, et al. 2015. Farmer seed networks make a limited contribution to agriculture? Four common misconceptions. Food Policy 56(1): 41–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Elias M, McKey D, Panaud O, Anstett MC, Robert T. 2001. Traditional management of cassava morphological and genetic diversity by the Makushi Amerindians (Guyana, South America): perspectives for on-farm conservation of crop genetic resources. Euphytica 120(1): 143–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2005. Congo : l'irrigation en Afrique en chiffres − Enquête AQUASTAT, 10 p. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2006. Situation du manioc en République du Congo : état des lieux et perspectives. Rapport présenté par l'équipe nationale de coordination des activités sur le manioc au Congo, 26 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kombo GR, Dansi A, Loko LY, Orkwor GC, Vodouhè R, Assogba P, et al. 2012. Diversity of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) cultivars and its management in the department of Bouenza in the Republic of Congo. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 59(8): 1789–1803. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Labeyrie V, Thomas M, Muthamia ZK, Leclerc C. 2015. Seed exchange networks, ethnicity and sorghum diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(1): 98–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lebot V. 2014. Strengthening smallholders' capacity to adapt to agro-climatic changes: optimization of root crops germplasm management and use. Journal of Root Crops 39(2): 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Lebot V, Ivancic A, Kuttolamadathil A. 2005. The geographical distribution of allelic diversity, a practical means of preserving and using minor root crop genetic resources. Experimental Agriculture 41(4): 475–489. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Legg JP, Owor B, Sseruwagi P, Ndunguru J. 2006. Cassava mosaic virus disease in East and Central Africa: epidemiology and management of a regional pandemic. Advances in Virus Research 67(1): 355–418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Legg JP, Jeremiaha SC, Obiero HM, Maruthi MN, Ndyetabula I, Okao-Okuja G, et al. 2011. Comparing the regional epidemiology of the cassava mosaic and cassava brownstreak virus pandemics in Africa. Virus Research 159(2): 161–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Letourneau DK, Armbrecht I, Rivera BS, Lerma JM, Carmona EJ, Daza MC, et al. 2011. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. Ecological Applications 21(1): 9–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mabanza J. 1992. La sélection et l'amélioration du manioc au Congo : acquis et perspectives. Brazzaville (Congo) : CERAG/DGRST, 127 p. [Google Scholar]
  • McGuire S, Sperling L. 2016. Seed systems smallholder farmer use. Food Security 8(1): 179–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McKey D, Elias M, Pujol B, Duputié A, Delêtre M, Renard D. 2012. Maintien du potentiel adaptatif chez les plantes domestiquées à propagation clonale. Leçons de gestion par les cultivateurs de manioc amérindiens. Revue d'Ethnoécologie 1. Disponible sur http://ethnoecologie.revues.org/741. [Google Scholar]
  • Mvila AC, Ntawuruhunga P, Bembe PA, Obambi M. 2003. La mosaïque africaine du manioc en République du Congo : distribution et importance de la maladie. in: 13th symposium of International Society for Tropical Root Crop (ISTRC), Arusha-Tanzania, November 10–14th 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, et al. 2013. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version 2. 2-0. [Google Scholar]
  • Olsen KM, Schaal BA. 1999. Evidence on the origin of cassava: phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96(10): 5586–5591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Otabo FR, Labeyrie V, Duval MF, Mabanza J, Mialoundama F. 2016. Diversité variétale de manioc sur la base des nominations vernaculaires des agriculteurs dans 4 bassins de production (Hinda, Loudima, Odziba et Oyo) en République du Congo. Journal of Applied Bioscience 104(1): 9932–9941. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peroni N, Hanazaki N. 2002. Current and lost diversity of cultivated varieties, especially cassava, under swidden cultivation systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 92(2): 171–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pham JL, Morin SR, Sebastian LS. 2002. Rice, farmers and genebanks: a case study in the Cagayan valley, Philippines. In Engels JMM, Bamanatha Roa V, Brown AHD, Jackson MT, eds. Managing plant genetic resources. New York: CABI, pp. 149–159. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinton F, Emperaire L. 2001. Le manioc en Amazonie brésilienne : diversité variétale et marché. Genetic Selection and Evolution 33(1): 491–512. [Google Scholar]
  • Pujol B, David P, McKey D. 2005. Microevolution in agricultural environments: how a traditional Amerindian farming practice favours heterozygosity in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae). Ecology Letters 8(2): 138–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ratnadass A, Fernandes P, Avelino J, Habib R. 2012. Plant species diversity for sustainable management of crop pests and diseases in agroecosystems: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32(1): 273–303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rossi JP. 2011. Rich: an R package to analyse species richness. Diversity 3(1): 112–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (Austria). Available from https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Sardos J, McKey D, Duval MF, Malapa R, Noyer JL, Lebot V. 2008. Evolution of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) after recent introduction into a South Pacific Island system: the contribution of sex to the diversification of a clonally propagated crop. Genome 51(11): 912–921. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Scherer R, Pallmann P. 2014. Simboot: simultaneous inference for diversity indices. R package version 0. 2-5. [Google Scholar]
  • Seboka B, Hintum VT. 2006. The dynamics of on-farm management of sorghum in Ethiopia: implication for the conservation and improvement of plant genetic resources. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53(7): 1385–1403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(1): 379–423. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.