| Issue |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 27, Number 1, Janvier-Février 2018
Évaluer les impacts des recherches en agriculture sur la société : outils, méthodes, études de cas. Coordonnateurs : Ariane Gaunand, Ludovic Temple, Gilles Trouche
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 15002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 13 | |
| Section | Études originales / Original Studies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017055 | |
| Published online | 21 December 2017 | |
- Audoux C, Gillet A. 2011. Recherche partenariale et co-construction de savoirs entre chercheurs et acteurs : l'épreuve de la traduction. Revue Interventions économiques. Papers in Political Economy 43. Disponible sur http://interventionseconomiques.revues.org/1347. [Google Scholar]
- Beckman SL, Michael B. 2007. Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking. California Management Review 10 50(1): 25–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cohendet P, Grandadam D, Simon L. 2008. Réseaux, communautés et projets dans les processus créatifs. Management International 13(1): 29–43. [Google Scholar]
- Delma BJ, Nacro HB, Bougouma-Yameogo V, Vall E. 2016. Conception participative d'innovations et accompagnement des projets d'élevage familiaux au Burkina-Faso : explorer, expérimenter et évaluer. Revue d'Élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 69(2): 63–71. [Google Scholar]
- Dimaggio PJ. 1988. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In : Zucker LG, dir. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge (Ma): Ballinger Editions, pp. 3–22. [Google Scholar]
- Douthwaite B, Gummert M. 2010. Learning selection revisited: How can agricultural researchers make a difference? Agricultural Systems 103: 245–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Draetta L, Labarthe F. 2011. La recherche sur commande et le dilemme expert-chercheur : une analyse réflexive de l'implication du sociologue dans la mise en œuvre d'une politique publique de l'innovation. Revue Interventions économiques 43. Disponible sur http://interventionseconomiques.revues.org/1425. [Google Scholar]
- Engestrom Y. 1999. Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. Perspectives on Activity Theory: 377–404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Faure G, Gasselin P, Triomphe B, Temple L, Hocdé H. 2010. Innover avec les acteurs du monde rural : la recherche-action en partenariat. Versailles : Éditions Quae, 224 p. [Google Scholar]
- Foray D. 1994. Recherche et technologie − Les nouveaux paradigmes de l'apprentissage technologique. Revue d'Économie Industrielle 69(3e trimestre): 93–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hainzelin E, Barret D, Faure G, Dabat M-H, Triomphe B. 2017. Agricultural research in the Global South: steering research beyond impact promises. Montpellier : CIRAD, Perspective 42, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
- Hall A. 2005. Capacity development for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries: An innovation systems view of what it is and how to develop it. Journal of International Development 17: 611–630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hall R, Andriani P. 2003. Managing knowledge associated with innovation. Journal of Business Research 56: 145–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hatchuel A. 1994. Apprentissages collectifs et activités de conception. Revue Française de Gestion 99: 10–120. [Google Scholar]
- Howells J. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35(5): 715–728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Klerkx L, Hall A, Leeuwis C, 2009. Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8(5-6): 409–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Klerkx L, van Mierlo B, Leeuwis C. 2012. Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions. In : Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B, eds. Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer Science (Dordrecht), pp. 457–483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kolb DA, Boyatzis RE, Mainemelis C. 2001. Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles 1(8): 227–247. [Google Scholar]
- Lamers D, Schut M, Klerkx L. 2017. Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Science and Public Policy: 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Laperche B, Munier F, Hamdouch A. 2008. The collective innovation process and the need for dynamic coordination: general presentation. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 2(2): 3–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leeuwis C, Schut M, Waters-Bayer A, Mur R, Atta-Krah K, Douthwaite B. 2014. Capacity to innovate from a system CGIAR research program perspective. Program Brief: AAS-2014-29. CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems, Penang, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
- Lusthaus C, Adrien M-H, Perstinger M. 1999. Capacity development: definitions, issues and implications for planning, monitoring and evaluation. Universalia Occasional paper n° 35, septembre 1999, 21 p. [Google Scholar]
- Martin A, 2013. Le Partenariat Européen pour l'Innovation (PEI) : la mise en réseaux comme levier de l'innovation en agriculture. Centre d'Études et de Prospective, n° 65, novembre 2013, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
- Musiolik J, Markard J, Hekkert M. 2012. Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79: 1032–1048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pant LP. 2012. Learning and Innovation Competence in Agricultural and Rural Development. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 18: 205–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Perez YA. 2008. La pratique de la recherche-intervention dans les organisations : retour sur les modes de production des connaissances gestionnaires à partir du terrain. Humanisme et Entreprise 3(288): 101–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Petticrew M, Roberts H. 2003. Evidence, hierarchies and typologies: horses for courses. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 57: 527–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pichault F, Lisein O, Rondeaux G, Xhauflair V. 2008. La Recherche-intervention peut-elle être socialement responsable ? Paris : Éditions Vuibert, 251 p. [Google Scholar]
- Plottu B, Plottu E. 2009. Contraintes et vertus de l'évaluation participative. Revue française de gestion 2(192): 31–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sabourin E, Da Silveira LM, Sidersky P. 2004. Production d'innovation en partenariat et agriculteurs-expérimentateurs au Nordeste du Brésil. Cahiers Agricultures 13(2): 203–210. [Google Scholar]
- Senge P. 2016. La cinquième discipline. Levier des organisations apprenantes. Eds Eyrolle, 460 p. [Google Scholar]
- Spielman DJ, Ekboir J, Davis K, 2009. The art and science of innovation systems inquiry: Applications to Sub-Saharan African agriculture. Technology in Society 31: 399–405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Szostak B, 2006. La profession de designer. Une source légitime de créativité. Revue française de gestion 2(161): 125–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- TAP (Tropical Agriculture Platform). 2016. Common Framework on Capacity Development for Agricultural Innovation Systems: Conceptual Background. Wallingford (UK): CAB International, 101 p. [Google Scholar]
- Toillier A, De Lapeyre de Bellaire L, 2016. Contributions de la recherche à l'innovation dans les filières. In : Biénabe E, Rival A, Loeillet D, eds. Développement durable et filières tropicales. Versailles : Ed. Quae, pp. 97–108. [Google Scholar]
- Triomphe B, Barret D, Clavel D, Dabat MH, Devaux-Spatarakis A, Faure G, et al. 2015. Towards a generic, comprehensive and participatory approach for assessing the impact of agricultural research in developing countries. In : Impacts of Agricultural Research − an Approach of Societal Values. Paris: INRA, 27 p. Available from https://colloque.inra.fr/impar. [Google Scholar]
- Turner JA, Klerkx L, Rijswijk K, Williams T, Barnard T, 2016. Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. NJAS − Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 76: 99–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vall E, Chia E, Blanchard M, Koutou M, Coulibaly K, Andrieu N. 2016. La co-conception en partenariat de systèmes agricoles innovants. Cahiers Agricultures 25: 15001. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Woodhill J. 2010. Capacities for institutional innovation: a complexity perspective in capacity, reflecting collectively on capacities for changes. IDS Bulletin 41(3): 47–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- World Bank. 2007. Enhancing agricultural innovation: how to go beyond the strengthening of research systems. Washington DC, 135 p. [Google Scholar]
- Xhauflair V, Pichault F. 2011. Le chercheur comme entrepreneur de l'innovation inter-organisationnelle. Enjeux méthodologiques d'une recherche-intervention partenariale. SociologieS. Dossiers, Les partenariats de recherche. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.