Co-production of ecosystem services through agricultural practices: perception of stakeholders supporting smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon

Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Coordonnateurs : Georges Serpantié, Philippe Méral, Fano Andriamahefazafy, Jean-Christophe Castella, Malyne Neang

Open Access

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 30, 2021 Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Coordonnateurs : Georges Serpantié, Philippe Méral, Fano Andriamahefazafy, Jean-Christophe Castella, Malyne Neang


Article Number		20
Number of page(s)		11
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021006
Published online		09 April 2021

Altieri MA. 2004. Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0035:LEATFI]2.0.CO;2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barnaud C, Antona M. 2014. Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Geoforum 56: 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barreteau O, Bousquet F, Etienne M, Souchère V, D’Aquino P. 2010. La modélisation d’accompagnement: une méthode de recherche participative et adaptative. In: La modélisation d’accompagnement: une démarche en appui au développement durable. Paris (France): Quae éditions, pp. 21–46. [Google Scholar]
Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundil G, Díaz S, Egoh B, et al. 2015. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007. [Google Scholar]
Bernués A, Tello-García E, Rodríguez-Ortega T, Ripoll-Bosch R, Casasús I. 2016. Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers. Land Use Policy 59: 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.033. [Google Scholar]
Blanco J, Sourdril A, Deconchat M, Barnaud C, Cristobal M, Andrieu M. 2020. How farmers feel about trees: perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices associated with rural forests in southwestern France. Ecosystem Services 42: 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101066. [Google Scholar]
Carneiro R, Navegantes L. 2019. A diversidade de experiências de recuperação florestal praticada por agricultores familiares do Nordeste do Pará. Geoambiente On-line: 293–314. https://doi.org/10.5216/revgeoamb.v0i35.57152. [Google Scholar]
Costa F. 2008. Desenvolvimento sustentável na Amazônia: o papel estratégico do campesinato. In: O desafio da sustentabilidade: um debate socioambiental no Brasil. São Paulo (Brazil): Fundação Perseu Abramo, pp. 289–313. [Google Scholar]
Dainese M, Martin EA, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Bartomeus I, Bommarco R. 2019. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Science Advances 5: eaax0121. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dendoncker N, Boeraeve F, Crouzat E, Dufrêne M, König A, Barnaud C. 2018. How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions? Ecology and Society 23(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09843-230112. [Google Scholar]
Díaz S, Fargione J, Chapin III FS, Tilman D. 2006. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biology 4: e277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Duru M, Therond O. 2015. Designing agroecological transitions: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35: 1237–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x. [Google Scholar]
Haines-Young R, Potschin M. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli CLJ, Frid DG, eds. Ecosystem ecology: a new synthesis. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007. [Google Scholar]
IBGE − Censo Agropecuário. 2017. [2019/11/18]. https://censos.ibge.gov.br/agro/2017. [Google Scholar]
Lamarque P, Meyfroidt P, Nettier B, Lavorel S. 2014. How ecosystem services knowledge and values influence farmers’ decision-making. PLoS One 9: e107572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lewan L, Söderqvist T. 2002. Knowledge and recognition of ecosystem services among the general public in a drainage basin in Scania, Southern Sweden. Ecological Economics 42: 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00127-1. [Google Scholar]
MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being, 1st ed. Washington: Island press, 64 p. [Google Scholar]
Méral P, Pesche D. 2016. Les services écosystémiques. Repenser les relations nature et société, 1^er ed. Versailles: Éditions Quae, 300 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-2470-8. [Google Scholar]
Palomo I, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Martín-López B, Pascual U. 2016. Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. Advances in Ecological Research 54: 245–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.003. [Google Scholar]
Pokorny B, de Jong W, Godar J, Pacheco P, Johnson J. 2013. From large to small: reorienting rural development policies in response to climate change, food security and poverty. Forest Policy and Economics 36: 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.009. [Google Scholar]
R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
Resque G, Coudel E, Piketty MG, Cialdella N, Sá T, Piraux M, et al. 2019. Agrobiodiversity and public food procurement programs in Brazil: influence of local stakeholders in configuring green mediated markets. Sustainability 11: 1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051425. [Google Scholar]
Romesburg HC. 1985. Exploring, confirming, and randomization tests. Computers & Geosciences 11: 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(85)90036-6. [Google Scholar]
Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, Tekkene V, Bustamantef K, Setteleg J. 2014. Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 10: 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.884166. [Google Scholar]
Teixeira HM, Vermue AJ, Cardoso IM, Claros M, Bianchia F. 2018. Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management. Ecosystem Services 33: 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006. [Google Scholar]
Therond O, Duru M, Roger-Estrade J, Richard G. 2017. A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agronomy for Sustainaible Development 37: 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0429-7. [Google Scholar]
Tixier P, Peyrard N, Aubertot JN, Gaba S, Radoszycki J, Caron-Lormier G. 2013. Modelling interaction networks for enhanced ecosystem services in agroecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 49: 437–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420002-9.00007-X. [Google Scholar]
Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton S. 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64(2): 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.