Performances des coopératives agricoles innovantes : le cas de la valorisation de la figue de Barbarie par Nopaltec en Algérie

Open Access

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 32, 2023


Article Number		3
Number of page(s)		9
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022034
Published online		19 January 2023

Ayouz M, Alary V, Mekersi S. 2012. Analyse par enquête et modélisation de la place et du rôle de l’Opuntia (Opuntia ficus-indica) dans les systèmes agraires algériens semi-arides. Cahiers Agricultures 21(6): 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2012.0594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Baxter P, Jack S. 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report 13(4): 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573. [Google Scholar]
Chen HH, Lee AH, Chen J. 2017. The relationship between innovation and performance in special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms. Journal of Management & Organization 23(4): 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cook M, Plunkett B. 2006. Collective entrepreneurship: An emerging phenomenon in producer-owned organization. Journal of Agricultural Applied Economics 38: 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800022458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Deville A, Mouray D. 2018. Concilier performance économique et projet socio-politique au sein des coopératives : une gestion pour de nouveaux possibles. Revue Française de Gestion 276: 63–85. https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2018.00284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ensslin SR, Ensslin L, Imlau JM, Chaves LC. 2014. Processo de mapeamento das publicações científicas de um tema: portfólio bibliográfico e análise bibliométrica sobre avaliação de desempenho de cooperativas de produção agropecuária. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 52(3): 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032014000300010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Feder G, Just RE, Zilberman D. 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33(2): 255–298. https://doi.org/10.1086/451461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Filippi M. 2002. Les sociétés coopératives agricoles entre ancrage territorial et intégration économique. Études et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement: 79–94. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01231645. [Google Scholar]
Filippi M, Triboulet P. 2006. Typologie des comportements à innover des coopératives agricoles : une étude en région Midi-Pyrénées. Economie Rurale 296: 20–38. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.1873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Filippi M, Frey O, Torre A. 2008. Gouvernance d’entreprises coopératives et liens au territoire : comment apprécier l’ancrage des coopératives agricoles ? Colloque Sfer, février, Paris (France). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01198175. [Google Scholar]
Gentzoglanis A. 1997. Economic and financial performance of cooperatives and investor-owned firms: An empirical study. In: Nilsson J, van Dijk G, eds. Strategies and structures in the agro-food industries. Wageningen and Uppsala, Netherlands, pp. 171–183. [Google Scholar]
Hind AM. 1994. Cooperatives under performers by nature? An exploratory analysis of cooperative and non-cooperative companies in the agri-business sector. Journal of Agricultural Economics 45(2): 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1994.tb00395.x. [Google Scholar]
Kumar V, Wankhede KG, Gena HC. 2015. Role of cooperatives in improving livelihood of farmers on sustainable basis. American Journal of Educational Research 3(10): 1258–1266. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-10-8. [Google Scholar]
Lehenkari J. 2000. Studying trajectories and networks: The case of benecol margarine. Science & Technology Studies 13(1): 50–67. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lerman Z, Parliament C. 1990. Comparative performance of cooperatives and investor-owned firms in US food industries. Agribusiness 6(6): 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6297(199011)6:6%3C527::AID-AGR2720060602%3E3.0.CO;2-R. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Madani K, Remini H, Dahmoune F, Dairi S, Aoun O, Belbahi A, et al. 2016. Le figuier de Barbarie : une plante d’intérêt industriel. Dans : 1^er séminaire national sur la valorisation du figuier de Barbarie. Une plante pour le climat et le développement durable, le 19 septembre 2016, Bejaia, Algérie. [Google Scholar]
Magruder JR. 2018. An assessment of experimental evidence on agricultural technology adoption in developing countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics 10: 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Marcis J, Bortoluzzi SC, De Lima EP, Da Costa SEG. 2019. Model for assessing sustainability performance of agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 234: 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Martin M, Tanguy C. 2018. Proximités et construction d’une stratégie collective : application au cas de deux filières agroalimentaires. Géographie, économie, société 20: 423–447. https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.2019.0003. [Google Scholar]
Osuntogun A, Adeyemo R, Anyanwu E. 1986. The adoption of innovation by cooperative farmers in Nigeria. Tropical Agriculture 663(2): 158–160. [Google Scholar]
Pierre G, Bioteau E. 2017. L’ancrage territorial des coopératives de proximité en réponse à des besoins sociaux localisés. Études de cas dans l’Ouest français. Norois. Environnement, aménagement, société 242: 25–37. https://doi.org/10.4000/norois.6035. [Google Scholar]
Piot-Lepetit I, Olou AO, Saisset LA. 2019. Gestion de la performance et du risque dans les coopératives agricoles selon une approche Business Analytics : analyse bibliométrique et revue systématique de la littérature. Colloque Sfer, décembre, Bordeaux. [Google Scholar]
Razafindrazaka T, Fourcade C. 2016. L’entrepreneuriat collectif : Un outil du développement territorial ? Revue d’Economie Regionale et Urbaine 5: 1017–1042. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.165.1017. [Google Scholar]
Ritchie J, Spencer L. 2002. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Huberman AM, Mattew BM, eds. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Routledge, pp. 187–208. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986274.n12. [Google Scholar]
Saisset LA. 2014. Les trois dimensions de la gouvernance coopérative agricole : le cas des coopératives vinicoles du Languedoc Roussillon. Revue Recma 339: 19–36. https://doi.org/10.7202/1035585ar. [Google Scholar]
Sekhar D, Vijayan S. 2020. Are innovative cooperatives more financially sustainable? Evidence from primary agricultural credit societies in Kerala, India. ICEBE 2020, October 01, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-10-2020.2304908. [Google Scholar]
Sentis P. 2014. L’évaluation financière des coopératives modernes. Revue Française de Gestion 242(5): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.242.135-148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Slater SF, Narver JC. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of marketing 59(3): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Takahashi K, Muraoka R, Otsuka K. 2020. Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature. Agricultural Economics 51(1): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Triboulet P, Peres S, Filippi M, Chantelot S. 2013. Empreinte spatiale de la coopération agricole française. Un éclairage par l’analyse des structures de localisation. Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine 2: 363–390. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.132.0363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yin RK. 2017. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. New York: Sage publications, 352 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.