Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 34, 2025
Réduire l’utilisation des pesticides agricoles dans les pays du Sud : verrous et leviers socio-techniques / Reducing the use of agricultural pesticides in Southern countries: socio-technical barriers and levers. Coordonnateurs : Ludovic Temple, Nathalie Jas, Fabrice Le Bellec, Jean-Noël Aubertot, Olivier Dangles, Jean-Philippe Deguine, Catherine Abadie, Eveline Compaore Sawadogo, François-Xavier Cote
Article Number 30
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2025030
Published online 28 August 2025
  • Altieri M. 2002. Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1971: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00085-3. [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson CR, Bruil J, Chappell MJ, Kiss C, Pimbert MP. 2021. Reflexive Participatory Governance for Agroecological Transformations. In : Anderson CR, Bruil J, Chappell MJ, Kiss C, Pimbert MP, eds. Agroecology Now! Transformations Towards More Just and Sustainable Food Systems. Gewerbestrasse (Switzerland): Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61315-0. [Google Scholar]
  • Audouin E, Bergez J, Therond O. 2019. Participatory methodology for designing an agroecological transition at local level. In : Bergez J, Audouin E, Therond O, eds. Agroecological transitions: From theory to practice in local participatory design. Gewerbestrasse (Switzerland): Springer, pp. 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01953-2_9. [Google Scholar]
  • Ben Khalifa F, Nasr N, Hayouni N, Ounalli N, Hedhli M. 2022. Plan d’Action National de la Tunisie 2022-2030 pour une agriculture familiale viable et mieux intégrée dans des systèmes alimentaires durables, 88 p. https://www.utap.org.tn/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/PAN-Decennie-Vfinale.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Bessaoud O, Ton Nu C, Jouili M, Mkacher S, Guesmi A. 2017. Étude sur l’agriculture familiale à petite échelle au Proche-Orient et Afrique du nord, pays focus : Tunisie. FAO, CIHEAM-IAMM et CIRAD, 73 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bottazzi P, Boillat S. 2021. Political agroecology in Senegal: Historicity and repertoires of collective actions of an emerging social movement. Sustainability (13): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116352. [Google Scholar]
  • Bousquet F, Etienne M, D’Aquino P. 2010. Introduction. In : Etienne M, ed. La modélisation d’accompagnement : une démarche participative en appui au développement durable. Versailles (France): Éditions Quae, pp. 9–20. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-0621-6. [Google Scholar]
  • Braiki H, Hassenforder E, Lestrelin G, Moradet S, Faysse N, Younsi S, et al. 2022. Large-scale participation in policy design: Citizen proposals for rural development in Tunisia. EURO Journal on Decision Processes 10: 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100020. [Google Scholar]
  • Braiki H, Lestrelin G, Moradet S, Hassenforder E, Younsi S, Imache A, et al. 2021. La facilitation territoriale, un métier à développer et à défendre : une expérience tunisienne. Sciences Eaux et territoires 35: 36–40. https://doi.org/10.3917/set.035.0036. [Google Scholar]
  • Caquet T, Gascuel C, Tixier-Boichard M, Dedieu B, Détang-Dessendre C, Dupraz P, et al. 2020. L’agroécologie : des recherches pour la transition des filières et des territoires. Versailles (France): Édition Quae, 107 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-3130-0. [Google Scholar]
  • Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Phimmasone S, Tran Quoc H, Lienhard P. 2022. The Role of Actor Networks in Enabling Agroecological Innovation: Lessons from Laos. Sustainability 14: 3550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063550. [Google Scholar]
  • Chevrillon A, Ben Haha N, Burte J. 2017. Towards a territorialization of rural policies in Tunisia: The example of water and soil conservation policies. In : Caron P, Valette E, Wassenaar T, Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge G, Papazian V, eds. Living territories to transform the world. Versailles (France): Édition Quae, pp. 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Cicek H, Topp E, Plieninger T, Blanco-Moreno JM, Gultekin I, Cheikh M’hamed H, et al. 2023. A critical assessment of conservation agriculture among smallholders in the Mediterranean region: Adoption pathways inspired by agroecological principles. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 43: 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00926-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Dalgraad T, Hutchings NJ, Porter JR. 2003. Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 100: 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00152-X. [Google Scholar]
  • de Lattre-Gasquet M, Moreau C, Elloumi M, Ben Becher L. 2017. Vers un scénario « Des usages agroécologiques des terres pour une alimentation diversifiée et de qualité et un système alimentaire territorialisé » en Tunisie en 2050. Oilseeds & fats Crops and Lipids 24(3): 20. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017025. [Google Scholar]
  • Dias GC, Pereira GMCL, Geravis AMD, Alves ÂGC, de Farias MS. 2023. Making associative management in agroecology: The importance of participatory planning in rural associations. Contribuciones a Las Ciencias Sociales 16(3): 1259–1280. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.16n.3-018. [Google Scholar]
  • DGACTA (Direction Générale de l’Aménagement et de la Conservation des Terres Agricoles). 2017. Élaboration de la stratégie de conservation des eaux et des sols de la Tunisie, 202 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Duru M, Therond O, Fares M. 2015. Designing agroecological transitions: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35: 1237–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2018. Les 10 éléments de l’agroécologie : guider la transition vers des systèmes alimentaires et agricoles durables. Rome (Italie), 15 p. [Google Scholar]
  • FIDA. 2019. Programme d’options stratégiques pour le pays 2019-2024. Rome (Italie), 77 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gliessman S. 2015. Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems, 3rd ed. Boca Raton (United States): CRC press, 386 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17881. [Google Scholar]
  • Gliessman S. 2020. Transforming food and agriculture systems with agroecology. Agriculture and Human Values 37: 547–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10058-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Greenberg S, Drimie S, Losch B, May J. 2023. From local initiatives to coalitions for an effective agroecology strategy: Lessons from South Africa. Sustainability 15(15521): 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115521. [Google Scholar]
  • Hassenforder E, Braiki H, Lestrelin G, Faysse N. 2023. Transaction sociale & participation : un projet de recherche-action sur le développement territorial agricole en Tunisie. Pensée Plurielle 1(55): 175–190. https://www.cairn.info/revue-pensee-plurielle-2022-1-page-175.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Hassenforder E, Lestrelin G, Braiki H, Arfaoui R, Jendoubi M, Ferrand N, et al. 2022. Construire une démarche d’inclusion et son suivi-évaluation : leviers et contraintes. In : F3E, ed. Inclure pour transformer. France, pp. 105–120. [Google Scholar]
  • HLPE. 2019. Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome (Italy), 163 p. [Google Scholar]
  • ICPC (Institut de la Concertation et de la Participation Citoyenne). 2022. L’évaluation de la participation : principes et recommandations. France: Repères, 22 p. https://i-cpc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ICPC_2022_EvaluationParticipation.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Jaouadi R, Lestrelin G, Benaissa N, Scopel E, Ben Mimoun M, Bouarfa S. 2022. Assessing farmer field schools process to improve the participation of local actors: A case study in Tunisia. Acta Horticulturea 1355: 251–260. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1355.32. [Google Scholar]
  • Klerkx L, van Mierlo B, Leeuwis C. 2012. Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. In : Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B, eds. Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. London (UK): Springer Nature, pp. 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_20. [Google Scholar]
  • Lefebvre M. 2024. Politiques d’incitations à la transition agroécologique : apports de l’expérimentation économique. Mémoire pour l’obtention de l’habilitation à diriger des recherches. France: Université d’Angers, 111 p. https://hal.science/tel-04654284v1. [Google Scholar]
  • Lienhard P, Castella JC, Ferrand P, Cournarie M, d’Aquino P, Scopel E, et al. 2019. Accompanying the actors of the agroecological transition in Laos. In : Côte FX, Poirier-Magone E, Perret S, Roudier P, Rapidel B, Thirion MC, eds. The agroecological transition of agricultural systems in the Global South. Versailles (France): Édition Quae, pp. 89–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Magda D, Lamine C, Mardsen T, Rivera-Ferre M. 2021. Taking into account the ontological relationship to change in agroecological transitions. In : Lamine C, Magda D, Rivera-Ferre M, Marsden T, eds. Agroecological transitions, between determinist and open-ended visions. Brussels (Belgium): EcoPolis, vol. 37, pp. 33–56. [Google Scholar]
  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being synthesis. Washington (United States): Island Press, 155 p. [Google Scholar]
  • MEDAE (MEDiterranean multi-actor network on AgroEcology). 2025. MEDiterranean multi-actor network on AgroEcology [2025/02/20]. https://www.medae-agroecology.eu/fr/. [Google Scholar]
  • Ministère de l’environnement. 2019. Plan d’Action National de Lutte Contre la Désertification aligné aux horizons 2018-2030. Tunis (Tunisie), 176 p. https://www.scid.tn/fr/lcd/le-pan-lcd-2018-2030.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Patel R. 2013. The long Green Revolution. The journal of Peasant Studies 40(1): 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.719224. [Google Scholar]
  • Quinio M, Jeuffroy M, Guichard L, Salazar P, Détienne F. 2022. Analyzing co-design of agroecology-oriented cropping systems: Lessons to build design-support tools. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 42(72): 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00772-w. [Google Scholar]
  • Requier-Desjardins M, Boughamourra O, Lemaître-Curri E. 2024. Characterizing agroecology in North Africa, a review of 88 sustainable agriculture projects. Preprints.org, 25 p. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202407.1949/v1. [Google Scholar]
  • RTTA (Réseau Tunisien pour la Transition Agroécologique). 2024. Réseau Tunisien pour la Transition Agroécologique [2024/09/10]. https://sites.google.com/agroecologie-tunisie.network/new/accueil. [Google Scholar]
  • Sachet E, Mertz O, Le Coq JF, Cruz-Garcia GS, Francesconi W, Bonin M, et al. 2021. Agroecological transitions: A systematic review of research approaches and prospects for participatory action methods. Frontiers in sustainable food systems 5: 709401, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.709401. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanz-Cañada J, Sánchez-Hernández JL, López-García D. 2023. Reflecting on the Concept of Local Agroecological. Food Systems Land 12: 1147. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061147. [Google Scholar]
  • Schiller KJF, Klerkx L, Centeno DJS, Poortvliet M. 2023. Developing the agroecological niche in Nicaragua: The roles of knowledge flows and intermediaries. PNAS 120(47): 9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206195120. [Google Scholar]
  • Topp E, El Azhari M, Cicek H, Cheikh M’Hamed H, Dhraief MZ, El Gharras O, et al. 2023. Perceptions and sociocultural factors underlying adoption of conservation agriculture in the Mediterranean. Agriculture and Human Values 41: 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10495-7. [Google Scholar]
  • Wezel A, Brives H, Casagrande M, Clément C, Dufour A, Vandenbroucke P. 2015. Agroecology-Territories: Places for sustainable agricultural and food systems and biodiversity conservation. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40(2): 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1115799. [Google Scholar]
  • Wezel A, Gemmill Herren B, Bezner Kerr R, Barrios E, Gonçalves ALR, Sinclair F. 2020. Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 40: 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00646-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.