Espèces végétales invasives : processus d’invasion et répercussions sur l’environnement, les services écosystémiques et la santé humaine

Open Access

Review

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 34, 2025


Article Number		31
Number of page(s)		9
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2025031
Published online		02 September 2025

Abia WA, Montgomery H, Nugent AP, Elliott CT. 2021. Tropane alkaloid contamination of agricultural commodities and food products in relation to consumer health: Learnings from the 2019 Uganda food aid outbreak. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 20: 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12664. [Google Scholar]
Agnew M, Banic I, Lake IR, Goodess C, Grossi CM, Jones NR, et al. 2018. Modifiable risk factors for common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) allergy and disease in children: A case-control study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(7): 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071339. [Google Scholar]
Alves JL, Barreto RW, Pereira OL, Soares, DJ. 2010. Additions to the mycobiota of the invasive weed Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae). Mycologia 102(1): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-070. [Google Scholar]
Amare T. 2016. Review on impact of climate change on weed and their management. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics 2(3): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20160203.12. [Google Scholar]
Bacles CFE, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA. 2006. Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science 311(5751): 628. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121543. [Google Scholar]
Baker HG. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 5: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000245. [Google Scholar]
Bell CE, Wilen CA, Stanton AE. 2003. Invasive plants of horticultural origin. HortScience 38(1): 14–16. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.38.1.14. [Google Scholar]
Bernery C, Leroy B, Diagne C, Courchamp F. 2021. [2024/09/03]. 1288 milliards de dollars : chiffrer les dégâts causés par les invasions biologiques pour enfin agir. https://theconversation.com/1-288-milliards-de-dollars-chiffrer-les-degats-causes-par-les-invasions-biologiques-pour-enfin-agir-158204. [Google Scholar]
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, et al. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26(7): 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023. [Google Scholar]
Blossey B, Notzold R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: A hypothesis. The Journal of Ecology 83(5): 887–889. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261425. [Google Scholar]
Boltovskoy D, Guiaşu R, Burlakova L, Karatayev A, Schlaepfer MA, Correa N. 2022. Misleading estimates of economic impacts of biological invasions: Including the costs but not the benefits. Ambio 51(8): 1786–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01707-1. [Google Scholar]
Bossard CC, Randall JM, Horshovsky MC. 2000. Invasive plants of Californiaʼs wildlands. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 360 p. [Google Scholar]
Bradley BA, Blumenthal DM, Wilcove DS, Ziska LH. 2010. Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25(5): 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.12.003. [Google Scholar]
Caloni F, Cortinovis C. 2015. Plants poisonous to horse Europe. Equine Veterinary Education 27(5): 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12274. [Google Scholar]
Carey EV, Marler MJ, Callaway RM. 2004. Mycorrhizae transfer carbon from a native grass to an invasive weed: Evidence from stable isotopes and physiology. Plant Ecology 172: 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000026031.14086.f1. [Google Scholar]
Carpenter D, Cappuccino N. 2005. Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants. Journal of Ecology 93(2): 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.00973.x. [Google Scholar]
Cerevková A, Bobuľská L, Miklisová D, Renčo M. 2019. A case study of soil food web components affected by Fallopia japonica (Polygonaceae) in three natural habitats in Central Europe. The Journal of Nematology 51(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2019-042. [Google Scholar]
Chauvel B, Dessaint F, Cardinal-Legrand C, Bretagnolle F. 2006. The historical spread of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in France from herbarium records. Journal of Biogeography 33: 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01401.x. [Google Scholar]
Chen K-W., Marusciac L, Tamas PT, Valenta R, Panaitescu C. 2018. Ragweed pollen allergy: Burden, characteristics, and management of an imported allergen source in Europe. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 176(3-4): 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487997. [Google Scholar]
Chen X, Dai X, Liu Y, Yang Y, Yuan L, He X, et al. 2022. Solanum nigrum Linn.: An insight into current research on traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology. Frontiers in Pharmacology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.918071. [Google Scholar]
Cornell HV, Hawkins BA. 2003. Herbivore responses to plant secondary compounds: A test of phytochemical coevolution theory. The American Naturalist 161(4): 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/368346. [Google Scholar]
Darwin CR. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London (UK): John Murray, 602 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.68064. [Google Scholar]
Driscoll DA, Catford JA, Barney JN, Hulme PE, Inderjit, Martin TG, et al. 2014. New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111(46): 16622–16627. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409347111. [Google Scholar]
Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97(13): 7043–7050. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.13.7043. [Google Scholar]
Faillace CA, Lorusso NS, Duffy S. 2017. Overlooking the smallest matter: Viruses impact biological invasions. Ecology Letters 20: 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12742. [Google Scholar]
Forte TGW, Brundu G, Celesti-Grapow L, Siniscalco C, Barni E. 2019. Prunus serotina in Italy: A challenging candidate for the national list of priority invasive alien species. Plant Biosystems 153(6): 900–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2019.1666173. [Google Scholar]
FREDON. 2017. Observatoire des ambroisies. [2024/09/03]. https://ambroisie-risque.info/observatoire-des-ambroisies. [Google Scholar]
Gaire BP, Subedi L. 2013. A review on the pharmacological and toxicological aspects of Datura stramonium L. Journal of Integrative Medicine 11(2): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.3736/jintegrmed2013016. [Google Scholar]
Gao Y, Yu HW, He WM. 2014. Soil space and nutrients differentially promote the growth and competitive advantages of two invasive plants. Journal of Plant Ecology 7(4): 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtt050. [Google Scholar]
Gioria M, Hulme PE, Richardson DM, Pyšek P. 2023. Why are invasive plants successful? Annual Review of Plant Biology 74: 635–670. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-070522-071021. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
González-Orenga S, Boscaiu M, Verdeguer M, Sánchez-Moreiras AM, González L, et al. 2022. Adaptability of invasive plants to climate change. AgroLife Scientific Journal 11(2): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.17930/AGL202227. [Google Scholar]
Goss EM, Kendig AE, Adhikari A, Lane B, Kortessis N, Holt RD, et al. 2020. Disease in invasive plant populations. Annual Review of Phytopathology 58: 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-010820-012757. [Google Scholar]
Guo K, Pyšek P, van Kleunen M, Kinlock NL, Lučanová M, Leitch IJ, et al. 2024. Plant invasion and naturalization are influenced by genome size, ecology and economic use globally. Nature Communications 15: 1330. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45667-4. [Google Scholar]
Guo W-Y., van Kleunen M, Pierce S, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, et al. 2019. Domestic gardens play a dominant role in selecting alien species with adaptive strategies that facilitate naturalization. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28: 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12882. [Google Scholar]
Henderson S, Dawson TP, Whittaker RJ. 2006. Progress in invasive plants research. Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment 30(1): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133306pp468ra. [Google Scholar]
Hill RS, Khan R. 2023. Past climates and plant migration − the significance of the fossil record. New Phytologist 238: 2668–2684. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18867. [Google Scholar]
Hobbs RJ, Humphries SE. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conservation Biology 9(4): 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040761.x. [Google Scholar]
IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In : Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Guèze M, Agard J, et al., eds. Bonn (Germany): IPBES secretariat, 56 p. [Google Scholar]
Jogesh T, Carpenter D, Cappuccino N. 2008. Herbivory on invasive exotic plants and their non-invasive relatives. Biological Invasions 6: 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9236-z. [Google Scholar]
Kalisz S, Kivlin SN, Bialic-Murphy L. 2021. Allelopathy is pervasive in invasive plants. Biological Invasions 23: 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02383-6. [Google Scholar]
Korpelainen H, Pietiläinen M. 2023. What makes a good plant invader? Life 13(7): 1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071596. [Google Scholar]
Lazzaro L, Essl F, Lugliè A, Padedda BM, Pyšek P, Brundu G. 2018. Invasive alien plant impacts on human health and well-being. In : Mazza G, Tricarico E, eds. Invasive species and human health. Wallingford (UK): CABI, pp. 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786390981.0016. [Google Scholar]
Liendo D, Campos JA, Gandarillas A. 2023. Cortaderia selloana, an example of aggressive invaders that affect human health, yet to be included in binding international invasive catalogues. NeoBiota 89: 229–237. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.89.110500. [Google Scholar]
Livingstone SW, Isaac ME, Cadotte MW. 2020. Invasive dominance and resident diversity: Unpacking the impact of plant invasion on biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ecological Monographs 90(4): e01425. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1425. [Google Scholar]
Locken LJ, Kelsey RG. 1987. Cnicin concentrations in Centaurea maculosa, spotted knapweed. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 15(2): 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(87)90005-6. [Google Scholar]
Lonsdale WM. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80(5): 1522–1536. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1522:GPOPIA]2.0.CO;2. [Google Scholar]
Lühken R, Brattig N, Becker N. 2023. Introduction of invasive mosquito species into Europe and prospects for arbovirus transmission and vector control in an era of globalization. Infectious Diseases of Poverty 12: 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-023-01167-z. [Google Scholar]
Maron JL, Klironomos J, Waller L, Callaway RM. 2014. Invasive plants escape from suppressive soil biota at regional scales. Journal of Ecology 102: 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12172. [Google Scholar]
McNeely JA. 2004. Strangers in our midst: The problem of invasive alien species. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 46(6): 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2004.10545159. [Google Scholar]
Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Versteirt V, Cull B, Kampen H, Fontenille D, et al. 2015.An entomological review of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Bulletin of Entomological Research 105(6): 637–663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485315000103. [Google Scholar]
Motard E. 2009. Étude de l’Ailante (Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle) comme exemple de plante invasive : risques pour la biodiversité de la forêt de Fontainebleau. PhD Thesis, 261 p. [Google Scholar]
Mounger J, Ainouche ML, Bossdorf O, Cavé-Radet A, Li B, Parepa M, et al. 2021. Epigenetics and the success of invasive plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 376: 15. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0117. [Google Scholar]
Moura RF, Queiroga D, Vilela E, Moraes AP. 2021. Polyploidy and high environmental tolerance increase the invasive success of plants. Journal of Plant Research 134: 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-020-01236-6. [Google Scholar]
Nan Q, Li C, Li X, Zheng D, Li Z, Zhao L. 2024. Modeling the potential distribution patterns of the invasive plant species Phytolacca americana in China in response to climate change. Plants 13(8): 1082. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13081082. [Google Scholar]
Nguyen N-A., Eskelson BNI, Gergel SE, Murray T. 2021. The occurrence of invasive plant species differed significantly across three urban greenspace types of Metro Vancouver, Canada. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 59: 126999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126999. [Google Scholar]
Peng K, Luo C, You W, Lian C, Li X, Shen Z. 2008. Manganese uptake and interactions with cadmium in the hyperaccumulator—Phytolacca Americana L. Journal of Hazardous Materials 154(1-3): 674–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.080. [Google Scholar]
Perrier A. 2020. [2024/09/27]. Le Frioul débarrassé de 200 tonnes de plantes exotiques envahissantes. https://www.marcelle.media/arrachage-plantes-exotique-marseille/. [Google Scholar]
Pyšek P, Lucanová M, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, Leitch IJ, et al. 2023. Small genome size and variation in ploidy levels support the naturalization of vascular plants but constrain their invasive spread. New Phytologist 239: 2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19135. [Google Scholar]
Pyšek P, Skálová H, Cuda J, Guo WY, Suda J, Dolezal J, et al. 2018. Small genome separates native and invasive populations in an ecologically important cosmopolitan grass. Ecology 99: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2068. [Google Scholar]
Qian H, Guo Q. 2010. Linking biotic homogenization to habitat type, invasiveness and growth form of naturalized alien plants in North America. Diversity and Distributions 16(1): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00627.x. [Google Scholar]
Rai KP, Singh JS. 2020. Invasive alien plant species: Their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health. Ecological Indicators 111: 106020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106020. [Google Scholar]
Rasmussen K, Thyrring J, Muscarella R, Borchsenius F. 2017. Climate-change-induced range shifts of three allergenic ragweeds (Ambrosia L.) in Europe and their potential impact on human health. PeerJ 5: e3104. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3104. [Google Scholar]
Reboud X. 2019. Pourquoi et comment le datura contamine-t-il les denrées alimentaires ? In : The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/pourquoi-et-comment-le-datura-contamine-t-il-les-denrees-alimentaires-113772. [Google Scholar]
Rejmánek M. 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch. Biological Conservation 78(1-2): 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(96)00026-2. [Google Scholar]
Rejmánek M. 2000. Invasive plants: Approaches and predictions. Austral Ecology 25(5): 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01080.x. [Google Scholar]
Richardson DM, Pyšek P. 2012. Naturalization of introduced plants: Ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytologist 196(2): 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04292.x. [Google Scholar]
Rutter WB, Franco J, Gleason C. 2022. Rooting out the mechanisms of root-knot nematode−plant interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology 60: 43–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-021621-120943. [Google Scholar]
Schnitzler A, Essl F. 2015. From horticulture and biofuel to invasion: The spread of Miscanthus taxa in the USA and Europe. Weed Research 55(3): 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12141. [Google Scholar]
Sheppard CS, Brendel MR. 2021. Competitive ability of native and alien plants: Effects of residence time and invasion status. NeoBiota 47–69. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.65.63179. [Google Scholar]
Steinberg C, Edel-Hermann V, Alabouvette C, Lemanceau P. 2019. Soil suppressiveness to plant diseases. In : van Elsas JD, Trevors JT, Rosaldo AS, Nannipieri P, eds. Modern Soil Microbiology − Third Edition. New York (USA): CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 345–361. [Google Scholar]
van Kleunen M, Pyšek P, Dawson E, Essl F, Kreft H, Pergl J, et al. 2019. The Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology 100(1): e02542. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
van Kleunen M, Xu X, Yang Q, Maurel N, Zhang Z, Dawson W, et al. 2020. Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success. Nature Communications 11: 3201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16982-3. [Google Scholar]
van Wilgen BW, Zengeya TA, Richardson DM. 2022. A review of the impacts of biological invasions in South Africa. Biological Invasions 24: 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02623-3. [Google Scholar]
Vilà M, Hulme PE. 2017. Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services preface. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 259 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3. [Google Scholar]
Vilà M, Trillo A, Castro-Díez P, Gallardo B, Bacher S. 2024. Field studies of the ecological impacts of invasive plants in Europe. NeoBiota 90: 139–159. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.90.112368. [Google Scholar]
Yuan M, Guo M-N., Liu W-S., Liu C, van Der Ent F A, Morel JL, et al. 2017. The accumulation and fractionation of rare earth elements in hydroponically grown Phytolacca americana L. Plant and Soil 421: 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3426-3. [Google Scholar]
Zhang ZJ, Zhou F, Pan XY, van Kleunen M, Liu M, Li B. 2019. Evolution of increased intraspecific competitive ability following introduction: The importance of relatedness among genotypes. Journal of Ecology 107: 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.