Open Access
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 27, Number 2, Mars-Avril 2018
Article Number 25006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018015
Published online 17 April 2018
  • Al’Afghani MM. 2006. Constitutional Court’s Review and future of water Law in Indonesia. Law Environment and Development Journal (LEAD) 2(1): 18. Available from http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0708/DOC22205.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Klaten. 2018. Data Strategis Kabupaten Klaten 2010–2016. Klaten, Java, Indonesia. Available from https://klatenkab.bps.go.id/publication/2018/01/24/00e494849513a10f516912cd/data-strategis-kabupaten-klaten-2010-2016.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnaud C, d’Aquino P, Daré W, Mathevet R. 2016. Dispositifs participatifs et asymétries de pouvoir : expliciter et interroger les positionnements. Participations 16: 137–166. Disponible sur https://doi.org/10.3917/parti.016.0137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Becu N, Perez P, Walker B, Barreteau O, Le Page C. 2003. Agent-based simulation of a small catchment water management in northern Thailand: Description of the CATCHSCAPE model. Ecological Modelling 170: 319–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeois R, Lopez JM, Sosiawan H, Kartiwa B. 2008. Boire ou manger ? Boire et manger. Vers une gestion intégrée du Kapilaler de Klaten. 13th IWRA Water Congress Proceedings. Disponible sur http://iwra.org/member/congress/resource/abs865_article.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Brugnach M, Tagg A, Keil F, de Lange W. 2007. Uncertainty matters: computer models at science-policy interface. Water Resource Management 21: 1075–1090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruns B, Helmi. 1996. Participatory Irrigation Management in Indonesia: Lessons from Experience and Issues for the Future. Background Paper for the National Workshop on Participatory Irrigation Management, November 4–8, 1996, Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  • Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bryson JK. 2009. Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as a way of knowing; The contribution of Actor Theory. International Public Management Journal 12(2): 192–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Catroux M. 2002. Introduction à la recherche-action : modalités d’une démarche théorique centrée sur la pratique. Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité 21(3): 8–20. Disponible sur https://apliut.revues.org/4276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers R. 1988. Managing canal irrigation: Practical analysis from South Asia. New-York (USA): Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ComMod. 2003. Our companion modeling approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6(1). Available from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/1.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Costello PJM. 2003. Action research. London (UK): MPG Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Douthwaite B, Kuby T, van de Fliertc E, Schulz S. 2003. Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems. Agricultural Systems 78: 243–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Étienne M. 2012. La modélisation d’accompagnement : une forme particulière de géoprospective. L’Espace Géographique 41(2): 128–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Faure G, Gasselin P, Triomphe B, Temple L, Hocdé H. 2010. Innover avec les acteurs du monde rural : la recherche-action en partenariat. Versailles : QUAE-CTA-Presses Agro. Gembloux. [Google Scholar]
  • Gummesson E. 1991. Qualitative methods in management research. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunton TI, Day JC. 2003. The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management. Environment 31(2): 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Gurung TR, Bousquet F, Trebuil G. 2006. Companion modeling, conflict resolution, and institution building: Sharing irrigation water in the Lingmuteychu watershed, Bhutan. Ecology and Society 11(2): 36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Horlitz T. 2007. The role of model interfaces for participation in water management. Water Resource Management 21: 1075–1090. Available from http://nrm.massey.ac.nz/changelinks/ar_working.html. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jonsson A, Alkan-Olsson J. 2005. Participatory modelling: (how) can computer generated information affect the “room of action” of local stakeholders? In: ACSIS Nationella Forskankonferens för Kulturstudier, Norrköpping. Available from http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/015/041/ecp015041.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Lesser EL, Stork J. 2001. Community of practices and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal 40(4): 831–841. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lidon B, Sosiawan H, Triomphe B, Van Hoy M. 2017. Gestion intégrée de l’eau en Indonésie : promouvoir de nouvelles pratiques pour éviter les conflits d’usage. Montpellier : Cirad. Disponible sur https://www.cirad.fr/nos-recherches/resultats-de-recherche/2017/gestion-integree-de-l-eau-en-indonesie-promouvoir-de-nouvelles-pratiques-pour-eviter-les-conflits-d-usage. [Google Scholar]
  • Lopez JM, Bourgeois R, Lidon B, Brault Y, Kartiwa B, Sosiawan H. 2011. From conflict to equity: Handling the challenge of multipurpose use of ground and surface water in Indonesia. In: Proceedings of Ground water conference, Orleans, France, March 2011. Available from http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560601/1/document_560601.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Magnuszewski P, Sendzimir J, Kronenberg J. 2004. Conceptual modeling for adaptive environmental assessment and management in the Barycz Valley, lower Silesia, Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2: 84–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayne J. 2001. Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 16(1): 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • McNiff J, Whitehead J. 2002. Action research: principles and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar]
  • Oja SN, Smulyan L. 1989. Collaborative Action Research: A Developmental Process. Volume 7 Social research and educational studies series. London: Falmer Press, 232 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New-York (USA): Cambridge university press, 280 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Perry CJ. 1996. Quantification and measurement of a minimum of indicators of performance of irrigation systems. Colombo (Sri Lanka): IWMI. [Google Scholar]
  • Purwanti Sri P, Jaji A. 2006. Measuring water conflicts potential: a basic principle. Dinamica TEKNIK SIMPIL 6(2): 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  • Reason P, Bradbury H (Ed.). 2001. The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Temple L, Biénabe E, Barret D, Saint-Martin G. 2016. Methods for assessing the impact of research on innovation and development in the agriculture and food sectors. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 8(5–6): 399–410. DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2016.1219484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vermillion DL, Samad M, Pusposutardjo S, Arif S, Rochdyanto S. 1999. An assessment of the smallscale irrigation management turnover program in Indonesia. IWMI research report 38. Colombo (Sri Lanka): IWMI. [Google Scholar]
  • Voinov A, Bousquet F. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 25(11): 1268–1281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wade R, Chambers R. 1980. Managing the main system. Canal irrigation’s blind spot. Economic and Political Weekly 15(39): A107–A112. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.