Open Access
Numéro
Cah. Agric.
Volume 27, Numéro 2, Mars-Avril 2018
Numéro d'article 25006
Nombre de pages 9
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018015
Publié en ligne 17 avril 2018
  • Al’Afghani MM. 2006. Constitutional Court’s Review and future of water Law in Indonesia. Law Environment and Development Journal (LEAD) 2(1): 18. Available from http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0708/DOC22205.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Klaten. 2018. Data Strategis Kabupaten Klaten 2010–2016. Klaten, Java, Indonesia. Available from https://klatenkab.bps.go.id/publication/2018/01/24/00e494849513a10f516912cd/data-strategis-kabupaten-klaten-2010-2016.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnaud C, d’Aquino P, Daré W, Mathevet R. 2016. Dispositifs participatifs et asymétries de pouvoir : expliciter et interroger les positionnements. Participations 16: 137–166. Disponible sur https://doi.org/10.3917/parti.016.0137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Becu N, Perez P, Walker B, Barreteau O, Le Page C. 2003. Agent-based simulation of a small catchment water management in northern Thailand: Description of the CATCHSCAPE model. Ecological Modelling 170: 319–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeois R, Lopez JM, Sosiawan H, Kartiwa B. 2008. Boire ou manger ? Boire et manger. Vers une gestion intégrée du Kapilaler de Klaten. 13th IWRA Water Congress Proceedings. Disponible sur http://iwra.org/member/congress/resource/abs865_article.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Brugnach M, Tagg A, Keil F, de Lange W. 2007. Uncertainty matters: computer models at science-policy interface. Water Resource Management 21: 1075–1090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruns B, Helmi. 1996. Participatory Irrigation Management in Indonesia: Lessons from Experience and Issues for the Future. Background Paper for the National Workshop on Participatory Irrigation Management, November 4–8, 1996, Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  • Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bryson JK. 2009. Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as a way of knowing; The contribution of Actor Theory. International Public Management Journal 12(2): 192–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Catroux M. 2002. Introduction à la recherche-action : modalités d’une démarche théorique centrée sur la pratique. Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité 21(3): 8–20. Disponible sur https://apliut.revues.org/4276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers R. 1988. Managing canal irrigation: Practical analysis from South Asia. New-York (USA): Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ComMod. 2003. Our companion modeling approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 6(1). Available from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/1.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Costello PJM. 2003. Action research. London (UK): MPG Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Douthwaite B, Kuby T, van de Fliertc E, Schulz S. 2003. Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems. Agricultural Systems 78: 243–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Étienne M. 2012. La modélisation d’accompagnement : une forme particulière de géoprospective. L’Espace Géographique 41(2): 128–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Faure G, Gasselin P, Triomphe B, Temple L, Hocdé H. 2010. Innover avec les acteurs du monde rural : la recherche-action en partenariat. Versailles : QUAE-CTA-Presses Agro. Gembloux. [Google Scholar]
  • Gummesson E. 1991. Qualitative methods in management research. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunton TI, Day JC. 2003. The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management. Environment 31(2): 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Gurung TR, Bousquet F, Trebuil G. 2006. Companion modeling, conflict resolution, and institution building: Sharing irrigation water in the Lingmuteychu watershed, Bhutan. Ecology and Society 11(2): 36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Horlitz T. 2007. The role of model interfaces for participation in water management. Water Resource Management 21: 1075–1090. Available from http://nrm.massey.ac.nz/changelinks/ar_working.html. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jonsson A, Alkan-Olsson J. 2005. Participatory modelling: (how) can computer generated information affect the “room of action” of local stakeholders? In: ACSIS Nationella Forskankonferens för Kulturstudier, Norrköpping. Available from http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/015/041/ecp015041.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Lesser EL, Stork J. 2001. Community of practices and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal 40(4): 831–841. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lidon B, Sosiawan H, Triomphe B, Van Hoy M. 2017. Gestion intégrée de l’eau en Indonésie : promouvoir de nouvelles pratiques pour éviter les conflits d’usage. Montpellier : Cirad. Disponible sur https://www.cirad.fr/nos-recherches/resultats-de-recherche/2017/gestion-integree-de-l-eau-en-indonesie-promouvoir-de-nouvelles-pratiques-pour-eviter-les-conflits-d-usage. [Google Scholar]
  • Lopez JM, Bourgeois R, Lidon B, Brault Y, Kartiwa B, Sosiawan H. 2011. From conflict to equity: Handling the challenge of multipurpose use of ground and surface water in Indonesia. In: Proceedings of Ground water conference, Orleans, France, March 2011. Available from http://agritrop.cirad.fr/560601/1/document_560601.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Magnuszewski P, Sendzimir J, Kronenberg J. 2004. Conceptual modeling for adaptive environmental assessment and management in the Barycz Valley, lower Silesia, Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2: 84–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayne J. 2001. Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 16(1): 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • McNiff J, Whitehead J. 2002. Action research: principles and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar]
  • Oja SN, Smulyan L. 1989. Collaborative Action Research: A Developmental Process. Volume 7 Social research and educational studies series. London: Falmer Press, 232 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New-York (USA): Cambridge university press, 280 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Perry CJ. 1996. Quantification and measurement of a minimum of indicators of performance of irrigation systems. Colombo (Sri Lanka): IWMI. [Google Scholar]
  • Purwanti Sri P, Jaji A. 2006. Measuring water conflicts potential: a basic principle. Dinamica TEKNIK SIMPIL 6(2): 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  • Reason P, Bradbury H (Ed.). 2001. The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Temple L, Biénabe E, Barret D, Saint-Martin G. 2016. Methods for assessing the impact of research on innovation and development in the agriculture and food sectors. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 8(5–6): 399–410. DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2016.1219484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vermillion DL, Samad M, Pusposutardjo S, Arif S, Rochdyanto S. 1999. An assessment of the smallscale irrigation management turnover program in Indonesia. IWMI research report 38. Colombo (Sri Lanka): IWMI. [Google Scholar]
  • Voinov A, Bousquet F. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 25(11): 1268–1281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wade R, Chambers R. 1980. Managing the main system. Canal irrigation’s blind spot. Economic and Political Weekly 15(39): A107–A112. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.