Explorer l’impact environnemental des transformations agraires en Asie du Sud-Est grâce à l’évaluation participative des services écosystémiques

Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Coordonnateurs : Georges Serpantié, Philippe Méral, Fano Andriamahefazafy, Jean-Christophe Castella, Malyne Neang

Open Access

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 30, 2021 Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Coordonnateurs : Georges Serpantié, Philippe Méral, Fano Andriamahefazafy, Jean-Christophe Castella, Malyne Neang


Article Number		3
Number of page(s)		11
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020042
Published online		12 January 2021

Angelsen A, Martius C, De Sy V, Duchelle AE, Larson AM, Pham TT (ed). 2019. REDD+ : la transformation. Enseignements et nouvelles directions. Bogor, Indonésie : CIFOR, 303 p. DOI: 10.17528/cifor/007447. [Google Scholar]
Ankersen J, Mertz O, Fensholt R, Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Nguyen TD et al. 2015. Vietnam’s forest transition in retrospect: demonstrating weaknesses in business-as-usual scenarios for REDD+. Environmental Management 55(5): 1080–1092. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0443-y. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Barbier EB, Tesfaw AT. 2012. Can REDD+ Save the Forest? The Role of Payments and Tenure. Forests 3(4): 881–995. DOI: 10.3390/f3040881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barnaud C, Antona M. 2014. Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Geoforum 56: 113–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bourgoin J, Castella JC, Pullar D, Lestrelin G, Bouahom B. 2012. Toward a land zoning negotiation support platform: “Tips and tricks” for participatory land use planning in Laos. Landscape and Urban Planning 104: 270–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bourgoin J, Castella JC, Hett C, Lestrelin G, Heinimann A. 2013. Engaging local communities in low emissions land use planning: a case study in Laos. Ecology and Society 18(2): 9. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05362-180209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Boyd W, Stickler C, Duchelle AE, Seymour F, Nepstad D, Bahar NHA et al. 2018. Jurisdictional Approaches to REDD+ and Low Emissions Development: Progress and Prospects. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 14 p. wri.org/ending-tropicaldeforestation. [Google Scholar]
Brofeldt S, Theilade I, Burgess ND, Danielsen F, Poulsen MK, Adrian T et al. 2014. Community Monitoring of Carbon Stocks for REDD+: Does Accuracy and Cost Change over Time? Forests 5(8): 1834–1854. DOI: 10.3390/f5081834. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bruun TB, Berry N, de Neergaard A, Xaphokahme P, McNicol I, Ryan CM. 2018. Long rotation swidden systems maintain higher carbon stocks than rubber plantations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 256: 239–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Hett C, Bourgoin J, Fitriana YR, Heinimann A et al. 2013. Effects of landscape segregation on livelihood vulnerability: Moving from extensive shifting cultivation to rotational agriculture and natural forests in northern Laos. Human Ecology 41(1): 63–76. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-012-9538-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Castella JC, Bourgoin J, Lestrelin G, Bouahom B. 2014. A model of the science–practice–policy interface in participatory land-use planning: lessons from Laos. Landscape Ecology 29(6): 1095–1107. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-0043-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cerbu G, Minang P, Swallow B, Meadu V. 2009. Global survey of REDD projects: What implications for global climate objectives? ASB Policy Brief 12. Nairobi: ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins, 4 p. www.asb.cgiar.org/PDFwebdocs/ASBPB12.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Chen H, Yi ZF, Schmidt-Vogt D, Ahrends A, Beckschäfer P, Kleinn C et al. 2016. Pushing the limits: The pattern and dynamics of rubber monoculture expansion in Xishuangbanna, SW China. PLoS ONE 11: e0150062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Chhatre A, Agrawal A. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(42): 17667–17670. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905308106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Clement F, Amezaga JM. 2009. Afforestation and forestry land allocation in northern Vietnam: Analysing the gap between policy intentions and outcomes. Land Use Policy 26(2): 458–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.06.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cramb RA, Colfer CJP, Dressler W, Laungaramsri P, Trung LQ, Mulyoutami E et al. 2009. Swidden Transformations and Rural Livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology 37: 323–346. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-009-9241-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Danielsen F, Adrian T, Brofeldt S, van Noordwijk M, Poulsen MK, Rahayu S et al. 2013. Community monitoring for REDD+: international promises and field realities. Ecology and Society 18(3): 41. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05464-180341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fox J, Castella JC, Ziegler AD. 2014. Swidden, rubber and carbon: Can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia? Global Environmental Change 29: 318–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Grainger A, Boucher DH, Frumhoff PC, Laurance WF, Lovejoy T, McNeely J et al. 2009. Biodiversity and REDD at Copenhagen. Current Biology 19: 974–976. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
He J. 2014. Governing forest restoration: Local case studies of sloping land conversion program in Southwest China. Forest Policy and Economics 46: 30–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Irawan S, Widiastomo T, Tacconi L, Watts JD, Steni B. 2019. Exploring the design of jurisdictional REDD+: The case of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 108: 101853. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jindal R, Swallow B, Kerr J. 2008. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum 32: 116–130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00176.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Leggett M, Lovell H. 2012. Community perceptions of REDD+: a case study from Papua New Guinea. Climate Policy 12(1): 115–124. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2011.579317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lestrelin G, Trockenbrodt M, Phanvilay K, Thongmanivong S, Vongvisouk T, Pham TT et al. 2013. The context of REDD+ in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional Paper 92. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. [Google Scholar]
Lestrelin G, Castella JC, Li Q, Vongvisouk T, Nguyen DT, Mertz O. 2019. A nested land uses–landscapes–livelihoods approach to assess the real costs of land-use transitions: Insights from southeast Asia. Land 8(1): 11. DOI: 10.3390/land8010011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Matthews R, Van Noordwijk M. 2014. From euphoria to reality on efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19: 615–620. DOI: 10.1007/s11027-014-9577-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mertz O. 2009. Trends in shifting cultivation and the REDD mechanism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1: 156–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mertz O, Padoch C, Fox J, Cramb RA, Leisz SJ, Nguyen TL et al. 2009. Swidden change in Southeast Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Human Ecology 37: 259–264. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-009-9245-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mertz O, Grogan K, Pflugmacher D, Lestrelin G, Castella JC, Vongvisouk T et al. 2018. Uncertainty in establishing forest reference levels and predicting future forest-based carbon stocks for REDD+. Journal of Land Use Science 13: 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2017.1410242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Minang PA, Van Noordwijk M, Duguma LA, Alemagi D, Do TH, Bernard F et al. 2014. REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: time for reconsideration. Climate Policy 14(6): 685–708. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.905822. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Müller D, Sun Z, Vongvisouk T, Pflugmacher D, Xu J, Mertz O. 2014. Regime shifts limit the predictability of land-system change. Global Environmental Change 28: 75–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pasgaard M, Sun Z, Müller D, Mertz O. 2016. Challenges and opportunities for REDD+: A reality check from perspectives of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. Environmental Science & Policy 63: 161–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pham TT, Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Mertz O, Le D, Moeliono M et al. 2015. Adapting Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) to Local Contexts in REDD+: Lessons from Three Experiments in Vietnam. Forests 6: 2405–2423. DOI: 10.3390/f6072405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pham TT, Hoang TL, Nguyen DT, Dao TLC, Ngo HC, Pham VH. 2019. The context of REDD+ in Vietnam: Drivers, agents and institutions (2nd edition). Occasional Paper 196. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. [Google Scholar]
Ramcilovic-Suominen S, Nathan I. 2020. REDD+ policy translation and storylines in Laos. Journal of Political Ecology 27(1): 1–20. DOI: 10.2458/V27I1.23188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Schmidt-Vogt D, Leisz S, Mertz O, Heinimann A, Thiha T, Messerli P et al. 2009. An assessment of trends in the extent of swidden in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology 37: 269–280. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-009-9239-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sheil D, Liswanti N. 2006. Scoring the importance of tropical forest landscapes with local people: patterns and insights. Environmental Management 38: 126–136. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0092-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sills EO, Atmadja SS, de Sassi C, Duchelle AE, Kweka DL, Resosudarmo IAP et al. 2014. REDD+ on the ground. A casebook of subnational initiatives across the globe. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 505 p. [Google Scholar]
Vongvisouk T, Lestrelin G, Castella JC, Mertz M, Brandt Broegaard R, Thongmanivong S. 2016. REDD+ on hold: Lessons from an emerging institutional setup in Laos. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 57(3): 393–405. DOI: 10.1111/apv.12134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wunder S, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. 2009. Payments for Ecosystem Services: A New Way of Conserving Biodiversity in Forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28: 576–596. DOI: 10.1080/10549810902905669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S. 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65: 834–852. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.