Open Access
Article de recherche / Research Article
| Numéro |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 30, 2021
Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Coordonnateurs : Georges Serpantié, Philippe Méral, Fano Andriamahefazafy, Jean-Christophe Castella, Malyne Neang
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 3 | |
| Nombre de pages | 11 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020042 | |
| Publié en ligne | 12 janvier 2021 | |
- Angelsen A, Martius C, De Sy V, Duchelle AE, Larson AM, Pham TT (ed). 2019. REDD+ : la transformation. Enseignements et nouvelles directions. Bogor, Indonésie : CIFOR, 303 p. DOI: 10.17528/cifor/007447. [Google Scholar]
- Ankersen J, Mertz O, Fensholt R, Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Nguyen TD et al. 2015. Vietnam’s forest transition in retrospect: demonstrating weaknesses in business-as-usual scenarios for REDD+. Environmental Management 55(5): 1080–1092. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0443-y. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barbier EB, Tesfaw AT. 2012. Can REDD+ Save the Forest? The Role of Payments and Tenure. Forests 3(4): 881–995. DOI: 10.3390/f3040881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barnaud C, Antona M. 2014. Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Geoforum 56: 113–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bourgoin J, Castella JC, Pullar D, Lestrelin G, Bouahom B. 2012. Toward a land zoning negotiation support platform: “Tips and tricks” for participatory land use planning in Laos. Landscape and Urban Planning 104: 270–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bourgoin J, Castella JC, Hett C, Lestrelin G, Heinimann A. 2013. Engaging local communities in low emissions land use planning: a case study in Laos. Ecology and Society 18(2): 9. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05362-180209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Boyd W, Stickler C, Duchelle AE, Seymour F, Nepstad D, Bahar NHA et al. 2018. Jurisdictional Approaches to REDD+ and Low Emissions Development: Progress and Prospects. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 14 p. wri.org/ending-tropicaldeforestation. [Google Scholar]
- Brofeldt S, Theilade I, Burgess ND, Danielsen F, Poulsen MK, Adrian T et al. 2014. Community Monitoring of Carbon Stocks for REDD+: Does Accuracy and Cost Change over Time? Forests 5(8): 1834–1854. DOI: 10.3390/f5081834. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bruun TB, Berry N, de Neergaard A, Xaphokahme P, McNicol I, Ryan CM. 2018. Long rotation swidden systems maintain higher carbon stocks than rubber plantations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 256: 239–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Hett C, Bourgoin J, Fitriana YR, Heinimann A et al. 2013. Effects of landscape segregation on livelihood vulnerability: Moving from extensive shifting cultivation to rotational agriculture and natural forests in northern Laos. Human Ecology 41(1): 63–76. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-012-9538-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Castella JC, Bourgoin J, Lestrelin G, Bouahom B. 2014. A model of the science–practice–policy interface in participatory land-use planning: lessons from Laos. Landscape Ecology 29(6): 1095–1107. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-0043-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cerbu G, Minang P, Swallow B, Meadu V. 2009. Global survey of REDD projects: What implications for global climate objectives? ASB Policy Brief 12. Nairobi: ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins, 4 p. www.asb.cgiar.org/PDFwebdocs/ASBPB12.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Chen H, Yi ZF, Schmidt-Vogt D, Ahrends A, Beckschäfer P, Kleinn C et al. 2016. Pushing the limits: The pattern and dynamics of rubber monoculture expansion in Xishuangbanna, SW China. PLoS ONE 11: e0150062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chhatre A, Agrawal A. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(42): 17667–17670. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905308106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clement F, Amezaga JM. 2009. Afforestation and forestry land allocation in northern Vietnam: Analysing the gap between policy intentions and outcomes. Land Use Policy 26(2): 458–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.06.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cramb RA, Colfer CJP, Dressler W, Laungaramsri P, Trung LQ, Mulyoutami E et al. 2009. Swidden Transformations and Rural Livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology 37: 323–346. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-009-9241-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Danielsen F, Adrian T, Brofeldt S, van Noordwijk M, Poulsen MK, Rahayu S et al. 2013. Community monitoring for REDD+: international promises and field realities. Ecology and Society 18(3): 41. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05464-180341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fox J, Castella JC, Ziegler AD. 2014. Swidden, rubber and carbon: Can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia? Global Environmental Change 29: 318–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Grainger A, Boucher DH, Frumhoff PC, Laurance WF, Lovejoy T, McNeely J et al. 2009. Biodiversity and REDD at Copenhagen. Current Biology 19: 974–976. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- He J. 2014. Governing forest restoration: Local case studies of sloping land conversion program in Southwest China. Forest Policy and Economics 46: 30–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.05.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Irawan S, Widiastomo T, Tacconi L, Watts JD, Steni B. 2019. Exploring the design of jurisdictional REDD+: The case of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 108: 101853. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jindal R, Swallow B, Kerr J. 2008. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: Potential benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum 32: 116–130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00176.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leggett M, Lovell H. 2012. Community perceptions of REDD+: a case study from Papua New Guinea. Climate Policy 12(1): 115–124. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2011.579317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lestrelin G, Trockenbrodt M, Phanvilay K, Thongmanivong S, Vongvisouk T, Pham TT et al. 2013. The context of REDD+ in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional Paper 92. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. [Google Scholar]
- Lestrelin G, Castella JC, Li Q, Vongvisouk T, Nguyen DT, Mertz O. 2019. A nested land uses–landscapes–livelihoods approach to assess the real costs of land-use transitions: Insights from southeast Asia. Land 8(1): 11. DOI: 10.3390/land8010011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Matthews R, Van Noordwijk M. 2014. From euphoria to reality on efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19: 615–620. DOI: 10.1007/s11027-014-9577-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mertz O. 2009. Trends in shifting cultivation and the REDD mechanism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1: 156–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mertz O, Padoch C, Fox J, Cramb RA, Leisz SJ, Nguyen TL et al. 2009. Swidden change in Southeast Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Human Ecology 37: 259–264. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-009-9245-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mertz O, Grogan K, Pflugmacher D, Lestrelin G, Castella JC, Vongvisouk T et al. 2018. Uncertainty in establishing forest reference levels and predicting future forest-based carbon stocks for REDD+. Journal of Land Use Science 13: 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2017.1410242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Minang PA, Van Noordwijk M, Duguma LA, Alemagi D, Do TH, Bernard F et al. 2014. REDD+ Readiness progress across countries: time for reconsideration. Climate Policy 14(6): 685–708. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.905822. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Müller D, Sun Z, Vongvisouk T, Pflugmacher D, Xu J, Mertz O. 2014. Regime shifts limit the predictability of land-system change. Global Environmental Change 28: 75–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pasgaard M, Sun Z, Müller D, Mertz O. 2016. Challenges and opportunities for REDD+: A reality check from perspectives of effectiveness, efficiency and equity. Environmental Science & Policy 63: 161–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pham TT, Castella JC, Lestrelin G, Mertz O, Le D, Moeliono M et al. 2015. Adapting Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) to Local Contexts in REDD+: Lessons from Three Experiments in Vietnam. Forests 6: 2405–2423. DOI: 10.3390/f6072405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pham TT, Hoang TL, Nguyen DT, Dao TLC, Ngo HC, Pham VH. 2019. The context of REDD+ in Vietnam: Drivers, agents and institutions (2nd edition). Occasional Paper 196. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. [Google Scholar]
- Ramcilovic-Suominen S, Nathan I. 2020. REDD+ policy translation and storylines in Laos. Journal of Political Ecology 27(1): 1–20. DOI: 10.2458/V27I1.23188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt-Vogt D, Leisz S, Mertz O, Heinimann A, Thiha T, Messerli P et al. 2009. An assessment of trends in the extent of swidden in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology 37: 269–280. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-009-9239-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sheil D, Liswanti N. 2006. Scoring the importance of tropical forest landscapes with local people: patterns and insights. Environmental Management 38: 126–136. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0092-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sills EO, Atmadja SS, de Sassi C, Duchelle AE, Kweka DL, Resosudarmo IAP et al. 2014. REDD+ on the ground. A casebook of subnational initiatives across the globe. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, 505 p. [Google Scholar]
- Vongvisouk T, Lestrelin G, Castella JC, Mertz M, Brandt Broegaard R, Thongmanivong S. 2016. REDD+ on hold: Lessons from an emerging institutional setup in Laos. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 57(3): 393–405. DOI: 10.1111/apv.12134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wunder S, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S. 2009. Payments for Ecosystem Services: A New Way of Conserving Biodiversity in Forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28: 576–596. DOI: 10.1080/10549810902905669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S. 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65: 834–852. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.