Open Access
| Issue |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 30, 2021
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 13 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020051 | |
| Published online | 05 February 2021 | |
- Berre D, Baudron F, Kassie M, Craufurd P, Lopez-Ridaura S. 2019. Different ways to cut a cake: comparing expert-based and statistical typologies to target sustainable intensification technologies, a case-study in southern Ethiopia. Experimental Agriculture 55(S1): 191–207. DOI: 10.1017/S0014479716000727. [Google Scholar]
- Delarue J, Mesplé-Somps S, Naudet JD, Robilliard A. 2009. Le paradoxe de Sikasso: coton et pauvreté au Mali. In: Développement, institutions and analyses. Document de travail no DT/2009-09). Paris (France): DIAL, 28 p. [Google Scholar]
- Fok M. 1993. Le développement du coton au Mali par analyse des contradictions : les acteurs et les crises de 1895 à 1993. Mémoire de DEA. Montpellier (France): Université Montpellier 1. [Google Scholar]
- Fok M, Nicolay G, Meier M, Balarabe O, Calaque R. 2019. Analyse de la chaîne de valeur du coton au Cameroun. Rapport pour l’Union européenne, DG-DEVCO. Value Chain Analysis for Development Project (VCA4D CTR 2016/375-804). 303 p. + annexes. [Google Scholar]
- Fok M, Koné S, Akindes F, Soro M. 2016. Mission d’observation des exploitations cotonnières en Côte d’Ivoire. Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire): Technoserve, 216 p. + annexes. [Google Scholar]
- Hoppe RA, MacDonald JM. 2013. Updating the ERS Farm Typology. SSRN Electronic Journal 110: 40 p. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2267293. [Google Scholar]
- Hoppe RA, Perry JE, Banker D. 2000. ERS farm typology for a diverse agricultural sector. Agriculture Information Bulletin. Available from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/33657/1/ai000759.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Kleene P, Sanogo B, Vierstra G. 1989. À partir de Fonsébougou... Présentation, objectifs et méthodologie du « Volet Fonsébougou » (1977–1987). Bamako (Mali): IER. [Google Scholar]
- Mazhoud H, Chemak F, Chenoune R. 2020. Analyse typologique et performance productive de la culture du blé dur irrigué en Tunisie. Cahiers Agricultures 29(24): 10. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2020021. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Newton D. 2002. Typology of America’s small farms. In: Proceedings of the Third National Small Farm Conference. Washington D.C. (USA): USDA, pp. 9–10. [Google Scholar]
- Samaké A, Bélières JF, Bosc PM, Sanogo O. 2007. Les implications structurelles de la libéralisation sur l’agriculture et le développement rural. Première phase : synthèse nationale. Bamako (Mali): Programme RuralStruc, CEPIA, 227 p. [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz I, Pam McRae-Williams P, Park D. 2010. Identifying and utilising a farmer typology for targeted practice change programs: a case study of changing water supply in the Wimmera Mallee. Extension Farming Systems Journal 5(1): 33–42. [Google Scholar]
- Sossou B, Fok M. 2019. Crédit de trésorerie des producteurs de coton au centre du Bénin : modalités et conséquences. Cahiers Agricultures 28(14). DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2019015. [Google Scholar]
- WTO. 2003. Poverty reduction: sectoral initiative in favour of cotton. Joint proposal by Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad and Mali. Geneve (Suisse): WTO. Available from http://docsonline.wto.org/Dol2FE/Pages/FormerScriptedSearch/directdoc.aspx?DDFDocuments/t/WT/Min03/W2A1.doc. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.