Intégrer la notion de service écosystémique dans les politiques et les pratiques agricoles des pays du Sud

Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Coordonnateurs : Georges Serpantié, Philippe Méral, Fano Andriamahefazafy, Jean-Christophe Castella, Malyne Neang

Open Access

Review

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 31, 2022 Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Coordonnateurs : Georges Serpantié, Philippe Méral, Fano Andriamahefazafy, Jean-Christophe Castella, Malyne Neang


Article Number		9
Number of page(s)		9
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022005
Published online		20 April 2022

Allema B, van der Werf W, van Lenteren JC, Hemerik L, Rossing WAH. 2014. Movement behaviour of the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius in crops and at a habitat interface explains patterns of population redistribution in the field. PLoS ONE 9(12): e115751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115751. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Andriamahefazafy F, Rakotonirina A, Serpantié G. 2020. Paiement pour services environnementaux (PSE) et motivations des usagers des terres d’un bassin versant. Cas de l’hydroélectricité à Tolongoina, Madagascar. Cahiers Agricultures 29: 36. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri2020034. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Potts SG. 2013. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28(4): 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bonnal P, Bonin M, Aznar O. 2012. Les évolutions inversées de la multifonctionnalité de l’agriculture et des services environnementaux. VertigO : la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 12(3). https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12882 [Google Scholar]
Castella JC, Lestrelin G. 2021. Explorer l’impact environnemental des transformations agraires en Asie du Sud-Est grâce à l’évaluation participative des services écosystémiques. Cahiers Agricultures 30: 3. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020042. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Caulfield M, Groot JCJ, Fonte SJ, Sherwood S, Oyarzun P, Borja RM, et al. 2020. Live barriers and associated organic amendments mitigate land degradation and improve crop productivity in hillside agricultural systems of the Ecuadorian Andes. Land Degradation and Development 31(13): 1650–1661. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Coleman GJ, Hemsworth PH. 2014. Training to improve stockperson beliefs and behaviour towards livestock enhances welfare and productivity. Revue scientifique et technique − Office international des épizooties 33(1): 131–137. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2257. [Google Scholar]
Colloff MJ, Wise RM, Palomo I, Lavorel S, Pascual U. 2020. Nature’s contribution to adaptation: insights from examples of the transformation of social-ecological systems. Ecosystems and People 16(1): 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1754919. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dainese M, Martin EA, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Bartomeus I, Bommarco R, et al. 2019. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Science Advances 5(10): eaax0121. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0121. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, et al. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373): 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Doré T, Makowski D, Malézieux E, Munier-Jolain N, Tchamitchian M, Tittonell P. 2011. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy 34: 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ellis EC, Pascual U, Mertz O. 2019. Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people: negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 38: 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
El Mujtar V, Muñoz N, Prack Mc Cormick B, Pulleman M, Tittonell P. 2019. Role and management of soil biodiversity for food security and nutrition; where do we stand? Global Food Security 20: 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.01.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2007. The state of food and agriculture 2007: paying farmers for environmental services. Rome (Italy): Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 240 p. [Google Scholar]
Félix GF, Diedhiou I, Le Garff M, Timmermann C, Clermont-Dauphin C, Cournac L, et al. 2018a. Use and management of biodiversity by smallholder farmers in semi-arid West Africa. Global Food Security 18: 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.08.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Félix GF, Scholberg JMS, Clermont-Dauphin C, Cournac L, Tittonell P. 2018b. Enhancing agroecosystem productivity with woody perennials in semi-arid West Africa: a meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38: 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0533-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fournier A. 2020. L’agroécosystème et les génies chez les Sèmè du Burkina Faso. Réflexion sur la notion de services écosystémiques culturels. Cahiers Agricultures 29: 25. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020024. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Gaba S, Lescourret F, Boudsocq S, Enjalbert J, Hinsinger P, Journet EP, et al. 2015. Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: from concepts to design. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35(2): 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0272-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Holland JM, Bianchi FJ, Entling MH, Moonen AC, Smith BM, Jeanneret P. 2016. Structure, function and management of semi-natural habitats for conservation biological control: a review of European studies. Pest Management Science 72: 1638–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn (Germany): IPBES Secretariat, 1148 p. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673. [Google Scholar]
Kebede Y, Baudron F, Bianchi F, Tittonell P. 2018. Unpacking the push-pull system: Assessing the contribution of companion crops along a gradient of landscape complexity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 268: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kleijn D, Bommarco R, Fijen TPM, Garibaldi LA, Potts SG, van der Putten WH. 2019. Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 34: 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Le Roux X, Barbault R, Baudry J, Bure F, Doussan I, et al. 2008. Agriculture et biodiversité : des synergies à valoriser. Rapport d’expertise. France: INRA, 637 p. [Google Scholar]
Lescourret F, Magda D, Richard G, Adam-Blondon AF, Bardy M, Baudry J, et al. 2015. A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Masse D, Badiane YN, Hien E, Akpo LÉ, Assigbetsé K, Bilgo A, et al. 2013. L’agriculture africaine face aux changements globaux : recherches et innovations basées sur les sciences de l’écologie. Comptes Rendus Biologies 336(5–6): 289–294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Maury C, Hrabanski M, Aznar O. 2016. Émergence tardive des services écosystémiques en France. In: Méral P, Pesche D, eds. Les services écosystémiques. Repenser les relations nature et sociétés. Versailles (France): Quae, pp. 141–160. [Google Scholar]
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington DC (USA): Island Press, 155 p. [Google Scholar]
Méral P, Pesche D. 2016. Les services écosystémiques : repenser les relations nature et société. Versailles (France): Quae, 304 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-2470-8. [Google Scholar]
Neang M, Méral P. 2021. Services écosystémiques et riziculture autour du lac de Tonle Sap, Cambodge. Cahiers Agricultures 30: 44. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021030. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Pagiola S, Platais G. 2002. Payments for environmental services. Environment Strategy Notes World Bank (3): 1–4. [Google Scholar]
Pulleman M, Creamer R, Hamer U, Helder J, Pelosi C, Peres G, et al. 2012. Soil biodiversity, biological indicators and soil ecosystem services—an overview of European approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(5): 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rapidel B, De Clerck F, Le-Coq JF, Beer J. 2011. Ecosystem services from agriculture and agroforestry: measurement and payment. London (UK): Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775656. [Google Scholar]
Resque AGL, Piketty MG, Coudel E, Messad S, Le Page C. 2021. Co-production of ecosystem services through agricultural practices: perception of stakeholders supporting smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon. Cahiers Agricultures 30: 20. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021006. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Seghieri J, Harmand JM. 2019. Agroforesterie et services écosystémiques en zone tropicale. Versailles (France): Quae, 254 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-3059-4. [Google Scholar]
Serpantié G, Méral P, Andriamahefazafy F, Castella JC, Neang M. 2022. Agriculture et services écosystémiques dans les pays du Sud. Cahiers Agricultures, numéro thématique. https://www.cahiersagricultures.fr/component/toc/?task=topic&id=1281. [Google Scholar]
Serpantié G, Rakotonirina A, Poussin JC, Toillier A, Andriamahefazafy F. 2021. Une approche cognitive co-constructiviste pour définir un service environnemental « bassin versant ». Cas de Tolongoina, Madagascar. Cahiers Agricultures 30: 18. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Skelsey P, Kessel GJT, Rossing WAH, van der Werf W. 2009. Scenario approach for assessing the utility of dispersal information in decision support for aerially spread plant pathogens, applied to Phytophtora infestans. Phytopathology 99: 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-99-7-0887. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tancoigne E, Barbier M, Cointet JP, Richard G. 2014. The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 10: 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tibi A, Therond O. 2018. Services écosystémiques fournis par les espaces agricoles. Versailles (France): Quae, 188 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-2917-8. [Google Scholar]
Tittonell P. 2014. Ecological intensification − sustainable by nature. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability 8: 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tittonell P. 2018. Ecological intensification of agriculture − Chapter 13. In: Serraj R, Pingali P, eds. Agriculture & food systems to 2050. global trends, challenges and opportunities. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 437–472. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813278356_0013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tittonell P, Piñeiro G, Garibaldi LA, Dogliotti S, Olff H, Jobbagy EG. 2020. Agroecology in large scale farming: a research agenda. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4: 584605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.584605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tittonnell P, Hara SM, Álvarez VE, Aramayo VM, Bruzzone OA, Easdale MH, et al. 2021. Ecosystem services and disservices associated with pastoral systems from Patagonia, Argentina − A review. Cahiers Agriculture 30: 43. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021029. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Trilleras JM, Jaramillo VJ, Vega EV, Balvanera P. 2015. Effects of livestock management on the supply of ecosystem services in pastures in a tropical dry region of western Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 211: 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wunder S. 2005. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Bogor (Indonesia): CIFOR, 32 p. [Google Scholar]
WWF. 2020. Living planet report 2020–Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. In: Almond REA, Grooten M, Petersen T, eds. Gland (Switzerland): WWF, 164 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.