Tableau 3
Répartition de l'échantillon en fonction du type d'exploitation agricole. Les différences de surface moyenne ont été testées par ANOVA et sont hautement significatives (ddl = 4, p value < 0,0001), les moyennes qui ne présentent pas de lettre commune sont significativement différentes au seuil de 5 % (test de Tukey).
Description of the different types of farming systems within our sample. Analysis of variance showed that the average acreage were significantly different between farming system (ddl = 4, p value < 0.0001), means with no common letter are significantly different (Tukey test).
| Type d'exploitation | Effectifs | SAU moyenne (ha) | Effectifs (%) | Total des surfaces palmiers | Surfaces totales (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Familiale | 15 | 13a | 23 | 126 | 4 |
| Patronale agricole | 15 | 34a | 23 | 352 | 12 |
| Patronale investisseur | 16 | 62a,b | 25 | 664 | 23 |
| Managériale agricole | 14 | 154b | 22 | 1132 | 38 |
| Managériale investisseur | 4 | 307c | 6 | 673 | 23 |
| Total général | 64 | 2947 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.