Table 3
Table of links of actors’ relationships.
Tableau des liens entre les relations d’acteurs.
| T | Pathway links on relationships issues | Description of the underlying mechanism(s) of the links | Possible alternative explanations to the mechanism(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Origin of the link | Destination of the link | |||
| 1 | Activity 1: CEBIOCA (Organic Cereals in the Camargue) project: Participative approach and agronomic “diagnosis” (2000–2004). Activity 2: Experimentations in farming plots (2005–2006). Activity 5: Experimentations of crop management techniques (2011). Activity 4: ORPESA (Organic Rice Production in Environmentally Sensitive Areas) “Table” (2006–2007). |
Outcome 1: Growing influence of INRA (French National Institute of Agronomic Research) in the network (2000–2014). | Increasing exchanges between farmers and INRA. | Increase in relationships between INRA’s adjacent actors. |
| Increase in relationships between INRA and other organizations. | ||||
| Relationships among all actors, excluding INRA, have decreased over time. | ||||
| 2 | Activity 1: CEBIOCA project: Participatory approach and agronomic “diagnosis” (2000–2004). Activity 2: Experimentations in farming plots (2005–2006). Activity 5: Experimentations of crop management techniques (2011). Activity 8: Experimentations by CIRAD (International Centre of Agricultural Research) (2012…). |
Outcome 3: Growing influence of CIRAD in the network (2000–2014). | Increasing exchanges between farmers and CIRAD. | Increase in relationships between CIRAD and other organizations. |
| Increase in relationships between CIRAD’s adjacent actors. | ||||
| Relationships among all actors, excluding CIRAD, have decreased over time. | ||||
| 3 | Outcome 1: Growing influence of INRA in the network (2000…). Outcome 3: Growing influence of CIRAD in the network (2000…). |
Outcome 4: More exchanges and links in the network (2000–2014). | INRA has become an important broker in the network. | Other actors were becoming knowledge brokers. |
| CIRAD has become an “average broker” in the network. | ||||
| 4 | External factors: - Good selling price of organic rice. - Demand growth for organic rice. |
Outcome 9: Growing influence of Biosud in the network (2003–2014). | Opportunity for Biosud to increase revenue. a | None. a |
| Outcome 8: Adoption of the organic production mode. | ||||
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.