Numéro |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 31, 2022
Données d’enquêtes socioéconomiques sur les ménages agricoles dans les pays du Sud. Coordinatrices : Sandrine Freguin-Gresh, Céline Dutilly
|
|
---|---|---|
Numéro d'article | 1 | |
Nombre de pages | 14 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021035 | |
Publié en ligne | 4 janvier 2022 |
- Balazs CL, Morello-Frosch R. 2013. The three Rs: How community-based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance, and reach of science. Environmental Justice 6(1): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2012.0017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Becker BK, Miranda M, Machado L. 1990. Fronteira amazônica: questões sobre a gestão do território. Brasilia, Distrito Federal: UNB, 219 p. [Google Scholar]
- Beebeejaun Y, Durose C, Rees J, Richardson J, Richardson L. 2014. “Beyond text”: Exploring ethos and method in co-producing research with communities. Community Development Journal 49(1): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bst008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bommel P, Bonnet MP, Coudel E, Haentjens E, Kraus CN, Melo G, et al. 2016. Livelihoods of local communities in an Amazonian floodplain coping with global changes: from role-playing games to hybrid simulations to involve local stakeholders in participatory foresight study at territorial level. Proceedings 8th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, iEMSs 2016, vol. 4. [Google Scholar]
- Bonney R. 2016. Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Underst Sci 25(1): 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bourgeron P, Kliskey A, Alessa L, Loescher H, Krauze K, Virapongse A, et al. 2018. Understanding large-scale, complex, human–environmental processes: A framework for social-ecological observatories. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/FEE.1797. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caron P, Cheylan JP. 2005. Donner sens à l’information géographique pour accompagner les projets de territoire : cartes et représentations spatiales comme supports d’itinéraires croisés. Géocarrefour 80(2): 111–122. https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.1031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, et al. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14): 8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Côrtes J, D’Antona Á. 2016. Fronteira agrícola na Amazônia contemporânea: Repensando o paradigma a partir da mobilidade da população de Santarém-PA. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi:Ciencias Humanas 11(2): 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981.81222016000200005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cortes JP, Coudel E, Piraux M, Silva MP, Santos BA, Folhes R, et al. 2020. Quais as perspectivas da agricultura familiar em um contexto de expansão do agronegócio? Zoneamento participativo com representantes comunitários do Planalto Santareno. Confins 45: 0–24. https://doi.org/10.4000/confins.28077. [Google Scholar]
- D’Aquino P. 2009. La participation comme élément d’une stratégie globale d’intervention : l’approche « gestion autonome progressive ». Cahiers Agricultures 18(5): 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1684/agr.2009.0330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Darby S. 2017. Making space for co-produced research “impact”: learning from a participatory action research case study. Area 49(2): 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Durose C, Beebeejaun Y, Rees J, Richardson J, Richardson L. 2012. Towards co-production in research with communities. Connected Communities 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Florin P, Wandersman A. 1990. An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology 18(1): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Folhes RT. 2018. A gênese da transumância no baixo Rio Amazonas: arranjos fundiários, relações de poder e mobilidade entre ecossistemas. Boletim Goiano de Geografia 38(1): 138. https://doi.org/10.5216/bgg.v38i1.52818. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner TA, Ferreira J, Barlow J, Lees AC, Parry L, Guimarães Vieira IC, et al. 2013. A social and ecological assessment of tropical land uses at multiple scales: The Sustainable Amazon Network. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368(1619). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0166. [Google Scholar]
- Grislain Q, Bourgoin J, Anseeuw W, Burnod P, Hershaw E, Diop D. 2020. Going beyond panaceas: The diversity of land observatory forms in Africa. Land 9(7): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030070. [Google Scholar]
- Hébette J, Marin REA. 2004. Colonização e fronteira – Articulação no nível econômico e no nível ideológico. In: Cruzando a fronteira: 30 anos de estudo do campesinato na Amazônia. Belém: EDUFPA, pp. 75–88. [Google Scholar]
- IBGE. 2018. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Produção Agrícola Municipal. [Google Scholar]
- Jouvenel F de. 2009. La prospective des territoires urbains sensibles : la construction des scénarios et quelques autres méthodes. Futuribles un guide méthodologique de la mission prospective et stratégie de secrétariat général du comité interministériel des ville, Paris, 43 p. http://www.ville.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/GUIDE_PROSPECTIVE_SG_CIV.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- KoboToolbox. 2019. Simple, Robust and Powerful Tools for Data Collection. https://www.kobotoolbox.org. [Google Scholar]
- Liu HY, Kobernus M, Broday D, Bartonova A. 2014. A conceptual approach to a citizens’ observatory-supporting community-based environmental governance. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 13(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-107. [Google Scholar]
- Nahum JS, Paixão PRC. 2014. Encontros e desencontros: fronteira, agronegócio da soja e campesinato no Planalto Santareno (PA). Revista NERA 25(17). https://doi.org/10.47946/rnera.v0i25.2622. [Google Scholar]
- Norström A, Cvitanovic C, Löf M, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, et al. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability 3(3): 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira A. 2001. A longa marcha do campesinato brasileiro: movimentos sociais, conflitos e reforma agrária. Estudos Avançados: Instituto de Estudos Avançados da Universidade de São Paulo 15(43): 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142001000300015. [Google Scholar]
- OpenStreetMap. 2019. Shapefile “Comunidades de Santarém, Mojuí dos Campos e Belterra”, from © the contributors of OpenStreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/. [Google Scholar]
- Patel M, Kok K, Rothman DS. 2007. Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 24(3): 546–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Piron M. 1996. Systèmes d’information et observatoires en sciences sociales : quel impact sur les démarches de recherche ? Cahiers des Sciences Humaines 32(4): 765–784. [Google Scholar]
- Rathnayake C, Joshi S, Cerratto-Pargman T. 2020. Mapping the current landscape of citizen-driven environmental monitoring: A systematic literature review. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16(1): 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1829845. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sauer S. 2018. Soy expansion into the agricultural frontiers of the Brazilian Amazon: The agribusiness economy and its social and environmental conflicts. Land-Use Policy (79): 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sherbinin A, Schiller A, Pulsipher A. 2007. The vulnerability of global cities to climate hazards. Environment and Urbanization 19(1): 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247807076725. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tonneau JP, Lemoisson P, Coudel É, Maurel P, Jannoyer M, Bonnal V, et al. 2017. Les observatoires territoriaux. Revue Internationale de Géomatique 27(3): 335–354. https://doi.org/10.3166/rig.2017.00035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vandenbussche L, Edelenbos J, Eshuis J. 2020. Plunging into the process: Methodological reflections on a process-oriented study of stakeholders’ relating dynamics. Critical Policy Studies 14(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2018.1488596. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I. 2014. At risk: Natural hazards, people vulnerability and disasters. London (UK): Routledge, 496 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714775. [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.