Open Access
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 25, Number 3, Mai-Juin 2016
Article Number 35001
Number of page(s) 13
Section Études originales / Original Studies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016020
Published online 18 May 2016
  • AFP. 2015. Le Burkina Faso va réduire sa production de coton transgénique à cause de problèmes techniques. AFP 07 mai 15 à 18 h 23. Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso).
  • Airault P. 2012. Jean Paul Sawadogo : sur les OGM, notre bilan est très positif. Consulté le 21/03/2015 au http://www.jeuneafrique.com/Articleimp_JA2668p084.xml0_jean-paul-sawadogo-sur-les-ogm-notre-bilan-est-tr-s-positif.html.
  • Cabanilla LS, Abdoulaye T, Sanders HJ. 2005. Economic cost of non-adoption of Bt Cotton in West Africa: with special reference to Mali. Int. J. Biotechnol. 7(1/2/3): 46–61.
  • Dowd-Uribe B. 2014. Engineering yields and inequality? How institutions and agro-ecology shape Bt cotton outcomes in Burkina Faso. Geoforum 53: 161–171.
  • Dowd-Uribe BM, Bingen J. 2011. Debating the merits of biotech crop adoption in sub-Saharan Africa: distributional impacts, climatic variability and pest dynamics. Prog. Dev. Stud. 11: 63–68.
  • Elbehri A, Macdonald S. 2004. Estimating the Impact of Transgenic Bt Cotton on West and Central Africa: A general Equilibrium Approach. World Dev. 32(12): 2049–2064.
  • Fichet M. 1996. L’impact de la privatisation dans les pays africains de la zone Franc. Coton Dev. 20: 8–18.
  • Fok M. 2004. Les facteurs d’efficacité des Systèmes de règlements privés comme institutions de régulation des transactions marchandes. In: Premier Colloque de l’Association Française de Sociologie, Villetaneuse (France), 24–27 février 2004, p. 19.
  • Fok M. 2010. Facteurs d’efficacité des arrangements institutionnels en politique cotonnière africaine. Cah. Agric. 19(1): 68–74.
  • Gouse M, Pray CE, Schimmelpfennig DE. 2004. The distribution of benefits from Bt Cotton adoption in South Africa. AgBioForum 7(4): 187–194.
  • Kaminski J, Headey D, Bernard T. 2011. The Burkinabé Cotton Story 1992-2007: Sustainable Success or Sub-Saharan Mirage? World Dev. 39: 1460–1475.
  • Kuraparthy V, Bowman D. 2013. Gains in Breeding Upland Cotton for Fiber Quality. J. Cotton Sci. 162: 157–162.
  • Qayum A, Sakkhari K. 2005. Bt cotton in Andhra Pradesh. A Three-year assessment. The first ever sustained independent scientific study on Bt cotton in India, Zaheerabad: Deccan Development society.
  • Renaudin C, Pelc H, Opois J. 2012. Cotonnier génétiquement modifié : l’expérience d’une campagne agricole au Burkina Faso. Cah. Agric. 21(6): 387–394.
  • Sigrist JC. 2014. Plan Coton Génétiquement Modifié : impact agronomique et économique. In: Géocoton Séminaire 2014. Le coton africain : évolution des principaux facteurs de production en zone cotonnière. 29/09–03/10/2014.
  • Stiller W, Reid P, Constable G. 2006. Lessons learnt in developing transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) varieties. Breeding for Success: Diversity in Action. In: Proceedings 13th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference. Christchurch, New Zealand. 18–21 April 2006.
  • Tao A. 2012. Coton-Bt au Burkina Faso. Quotidien Le Pays. Consulté le 12/06/2012 au http://www.nepadbiosafety.net/fr/coton-bt-au-burkina-faso.
  • Traxler G, Godoy-Avila S. 2004. Transgenic cotton in Mexico. AgBioForum 7(1 et 2): 57–62.
  • Vitale J, Boyer T, Uaiene R, Sanders JH. 2007. The Economic Impacts of Introducing Bt Technology in Smallholder Cotton Production Systems of West Africa: A Case Study from Mali. AgBioForum 10(2): 71–84.
  • Vitale J, Glick H, Greenplate J, Abdennadher M, Traoré O. 2008. Second-Generation Bt Cotton Field Trials in Burkina Faso: Analyzing the Potential Benefits to West African Farmers. Crop Sci. 48: 1958–1966.
  • Zepeda JBF, Nelson RG. 1997. Rent Creation and Distribution From Biotechnology Innovations: The Case of Bt Cotton and Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in 1997. Agribusiness 16(1): 21–32.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.