The evolution of a negotiated territorial development approach

Information spatiale et approches territoriales du développement, du diagnostic à la médiation / Spatial information and territorial approaches to development, from diagnosis to mediation. Coordonnateurs : Jérémy Bourgoin, Flavie Cernesson, Elodie Valette

Open Access

Issue		Cah. Agric. Volume 33, 2024 Information spatiale et approches territoriales du développement, du diagnostic à la médiation / Spatial information and territorial approaches to development, from diagnosis to mediation. Coordonnateurs : Jérémy Bourgoin, Flavie Cernesson, Elodie Valette


Article Number		12
Number of page(s)		9
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2024007
Published online		29 April 2024

Arcia D, Pinto Carrillo AC, Espinosa Restrepo L. 2023. Sistemas de ordenamiento territorial en América Latina y el Caribe: documento resumen. BID, 165 p. https://doi.org/10.18235/0004977. [Google Scholar]
Axelrod R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation (rev.ed). New York (PL USA): Basic Books, 264 p. [Google Scholar]
Barbosa Cavalcanti JS, Wanderley MN, Niederle PA. 2014. Participação, território e cidadania: um olhar sobre a política de desenvolvimento territorial no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): UFPE, 440 p. [Google Scholar]
Berthomé J, Mercoiret J. 1992. Planification du développement local − guide méthodologique, suivi de trois études de cas en Afrique de l’Ouest. Paris (France): La Documentation Française, 344 p. [Google Scholar]
Biancalani R, Brown D, DeWit P, Clementi S, Ljusa M. 2004. Participatory Land Use Development in the municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina − Guidelines. Roma (Italy): FAO, 75 p. https://www.fao.org/3/bc140e/bc140e.pdf [Google Scholar]
Bicchieri M. 2022. Women’s Land-Related Human Rights in Mozambique: The Gap Between Commitments de Jure and Local Practice. Stanford Journal of International Law 58: 113–150. [Google Scholar]
Blanc-Pamard C. 2004. Un jeu foncier de front pionnier en forêt des Mikea (sud-ouest de Madagascar): pratiques, acteurs et enjeux. In: Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, FAO Journal, Rome, Italie. https://www.fao.org/3/y5639t/y5639t00.htm#Contents [Google Scholar]
Boche M, Tanner C, Zimba ECL, Anseeuw W. 2013. Community-investor partnership: lessons from Pro-Parcerias in Mozambique. Prepared for presentation at the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Property, Washington DC, USA, April 8-13, 2013, 26 p. [Google Scholar]
Bojić D, Clark M, Urban K. 2022. Focus on governance for more effective policy and technical support. Governance and policy support framework paper. Rome (Italie): FAO, 104 p. https://www.fao.org/3/cc0240en/cc0240en.pdf [Google Scholar]
Bonnal J. 1995. Participation et risques d’exclusion − Réflexions à partir de quelques exemples sahéliens. Rome (Italie): FAO, 85 p. https://www.fao.org/3/v5370f/v5370f00.htm [Google Scholar]
Bonnal J, Cenerini C, Ciparisse G, Rossi M 2013. La Facilitation pour la Gouvernance Territoriale. Rome (Italie): FAO, 64 p. [Google Scholar]
Cabral L. 2011. Decentralisation in Africa: Scope, Motivations and Impact on Service Delivery and Poverty. Overseas Development Institute, Future Agriculture, Working Paper 020. Brighton (UK), 14 p. [Google Scholar]
Caron P, Valette É, Wassenaar T, Coppens DE, Papazian V. 2017. Living territories to transform the world. Versailles (France): éditions Quae, 274 p. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-2731–0 [Google Scholar]
Cenerini C. 2008. Access to legal information and institutions. Tales from Angola: San land rights in Huila province. Roma (Italy): FAO, Land Tenure Collection 3, 35 p. [Google Scholar]
Chase S, Wilkinson E. 2015. What happened to Integrated Rural Development? The Hunger Project. https://advocacy.thp.org/2015/08/what-happened-to-integrated-rural-development/ [Google Scholar]
Chatty D, Baas S, Fleig A. 2003. Participatory Processes Towards Co-Management of Natural Resources in Pastoral Areas of the Middle East. Roma (Italy): FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/ad424e/ad424e00.htm [Google Scholar]
Chauveau JP. 2002. La loi ivoirienne de 1998 sur le domaine foncier rural et l’agriculture de plantation villageoise : une mise en perspective historique et sociologique. In: Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, FAO Journal. Rome (Italie): FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/y3568t/y3568t07.htm [Google Scholar]
Colin JP. 2004. Côte d’Ivoire : droits et pratiques fonciers et relations intrafamiliales − bases conceptuelles et méthodologiques d’une approche compréhensive. In: Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, FAO Journal. Rome (Italie): FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/y5639t/y5639t06.htm [Google Scholar]
Deininger K. 2003. Land markets in developing and in transition economies: impact of liberalisation and implications for future reform. Am J Agric Econ 85: 1217–1222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
D’Errico M, Groppo P, De Gaetano M, Maruf M. 2023. Measuring credibility and trust: the key elements in humanitarian-development peace Nexus (HDPN) operations. African Journal of Economic Review 11: 68–81. [Google Scholar]
Esquinas Alcazar J. 2023. Rumbo al Ecocidio − Cómo frenar la amenaza nuestra supervivencia. Barcelone (Espagne): Espasa, 355 p. [Google Scholar]
FAO. 1993 Guidelines for Land Use Planning. Roma (Italy): FAO, 135 p. https://www., fao., org/land-water/land/land-governance/land-resources-planning-toolbox/category/details/es/c/1036358/ [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2005 Participatory and Negotiated Territorial Development. Roma (Italy): FAO, 104 p. https://www., fao., org/documents/card/en/c/ 783fd356 −1939-4797-ada0-0fa543f7ec04 [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2008. Metodologia para capacitação de agentes de ATER em uma perspectiva territorial. Rome (Italie): FAO. [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2016. Negotiation, environment and territorial development − Green Negotiated Territorial Development. Roma (Italy): FAO, 53 p. https://www.fao.org/3/i6603e/i6603e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2018. Final Evaluation of “Reabilitação de Terras e Gestão das Áreas de Pastagens nos Sistemas de Produção Agro-Pastoris de Pequenos Produtores no Sudoeste de Angola (RETESA)” https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/CA2863PT. [Google Scholar]
FAO. Policy on Gender Equality, 2020, 2020–2030. [2024/02/13] https://www.fao.org/3/cb1583en/cb1583en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2023a. Science and Innovation For Climate Action Forum. 16–20 October 2023 https://www.fao.org/science-technology-and-innovation/science-innovation-forum-2023/programme/strengthening-science-policy-interfaces-in-support-of-effective-decision-making/en [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2023b. Governance and policy innovation: Country experiences, tools and approaches. https://www.fao.org/events/detail/governance-and-policy-innovation [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2024. Key recommendations on FAO’s work on gender. [2024/02/13] https://www.fao.org/evaluation/highlights/detail/evaluating-fao%27s-work-on-gender/en [Google Scholar]
Franceschetti G, Tempesta T. 1993. La pianificazione del territorio rurale del Veneto negli anni Ottanta. Padova (Italy): UNIPRESS, 406 p. [Google Scholar]
Giordano T. 2013. Afrique du Sud : l’échec de la gouvernance décentralisée. In: Genevey R.,Pachauri Rajendra K, Tubiana L, Biagiotti I, Jozan R, Voituriez T (eds.), Regards sur la terre 2013: Réduire les inégalités: un enjeu de développement durable. Paris (France): Armand Colin, pp. 309–312. [Google Scholar]
González Mejía H, Mora Corrales H, Cenerini C, Charpentier Salazar G, Robert A. 2009. Costa Rica: Construcción dialógica de los territorios rurales. Rome (Italie): FAO. [Google Scholar]
Groppo P, Longhi L, di Grazia A, Kollozaj E, Chigi E. 2003. Land tenure support in post-conflict Angola, In Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, FAO Journal. Roma (Italy): FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/y5639t/y5639t0a.htm [Google Scholar]
Groppo P, Cenerini C. 2012. A territorial development vision oriented to indigenous peoples: a possible path. Roma (Italy): FAO, 33 p. https://www.fao.org/3/md974e/md974e.pdf [Google Scholar]
Groppo P, Guanziroli C. 2014. Family farming in Brazil: from concept to policy. FARM. https://old.fondation-farm.org/zoe.php?s=blogfarm&w=wt&idt=1705 [Google Scholar]
Groppo P, Carranza F, De Gaetano M, Henderson-Howat. 2022. Levelling the playing field for inclusive territorial development: Going beyond technical solutions. Roma (Italy): Land Portal, 8 p. https://landportal.org/node/101536 [Google Scholar]
Groppo P, Cangelosi E, Siliprandi E, Groppo C. 2023. Quando Eva bussa alla porta − Donne, terre e diritti. Verone. Verona (Italia): Ombre Corte, 174 p. [Google Scholar]
IRAM (Institut de recherches et d’applications des méthodes de développement). 1991. Gestion des terroirs et développement − Compte rendu des journées d’étude 13–14 Septembre, 74 p. https://www.iram-fr.org/ouverturepdf.php?file=84.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Kisamba-Mugerwa W. 1998. Private and communal property rights in rangeland and forests in Uganda. In Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, FAO Journal. Roma (Italy): FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/y5639t/y5639t00.htm#Contents [Google Scholar]
Lambert S, Sindzingre A. 1995. Droits de propriété et modes d’accès à la terre en Afrique. Cahiers d’économie et sociologie rurales 36: 96–128 [Google Scholar]
Maketho MJ. 2019. Tracing the Origins of Rural Development. Medium. https://medium.com/@mikemaketho/rural-development-programs-have-been-around-since-the-1950s-but-the-concept-was-brought-to-the-701bd31360f8. [Google Scholar]
Ministère de la Coopération, Caisse Française de Développement. 1994. De la gestion de terroirs au développement local − Les orientations de l’aide française. Paris (France), ministère de la Coopération, 27 p. [Google Scholar]
Montes Lira PF. 2001. El ordenamiento territorial como opción de política urbanas y regionales en América Latina y el Caribe. Santiago (Chili): CEPAL, 64 p. [Google Scholar]
Mushala HM, Kanduza AM, Simelane NO, Rwelamira JK, Dlamini NF. 1998. Dual tenure systems and multiple livelihoods: a comparison of communal and private land tenure in Swaziland. In: Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives, FAO Journal. Roma (Italy): FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/x1372T/x1372t08.htm. [Google Scholar]
Peemans JP. 2018. Agricultures, ruralités, paysanneries : réflexions et questions pour une économie politique critique des discours dominants sur le développement. Monde en Développement 2: 21–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Reyes GAQ. 2004. Informe de consolidación de las relaciones bilaterales estratégicas entre Colombia e Italia. Bogotà (Colombia): Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo, 62 p. [Google Scholar]
Sanchez Ulloa R. 2001. Ordenamiento Territorial. Santiago (Chili): IICA, 138 p. [Google Scholar]
Sachs I. 2006. New opportunities for community driven rural development, Issue Paper No. 3. Roma (Italy): ICARRD, FAO, 18 p. [Google Scholar]
Sarmento F, Ferreira J, Hurtado A. 2009. Territorial diagnosis handbook. Roma (Italy): Actionaid/FAO, 66 p. [Google Scholar]
Tanner C, De Wit P, Norfolk S. 2009. Participatory Land Delimitation − An innovative development model based upon securing rights acquired through customary and other forms of occupation, Roma (Italy): FAO, 56 p. [Google Scholar]
UN-ESCAP. 2009. Participatory Approaches to Rural Development and Rural Poverty Alleviation, Working Paper prepared by J.P. de Campos Guimarães, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague (Netherlands), 34 p. [Google Scholar]
Warren P. 2000. Ordenamiento territorial municipal: una experiencia en el Departamento de Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Rome (Italie): FAO, 48 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.