Open Access
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 33, 2024
Article Number 13
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2024008
Published online 29 April 2024
  • Abdelhafidh H, Bachta MS. 2016. Groundwater pricing for farms and Water Users Associations sustainability. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 9: 525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2553-0. [Google Scholar]
  • Alam MF. 2016. Evaluating the benefit-cost ratio of groundwater abstraction for additional irrigation water on global scale. Stockholm (Sweden): KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Division of land and water resources engineering, 96 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ameur F, Kuper M, Lejars C, Dugué P. 2017. Prosper, survive or exit: Contrasted fortunes of farmers in the groundwater economy in the Saïss plain (Morocco). Agricultural Water Management 191: 207–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Amichi H, Bouarfa S, Kuper M, Ducourtieux O, Imache I, Fusillier JL, et al. 2012. How does unequal access to groundwater contribute to marginalization of small farmers? The case of publics lands in Algeria. Irrigation and Drainage 61(1): 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1660. [Google Scholar]
  • Anantha KH, Raju KV. 2008. Groundwater over-exploitation, costs and adoption measures in central dry zone of Karntaka. Bangalore (India): Institute for Social and Economic Change, working paper 202, 32 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bédoucha G. 1987. L’eau, l’amie du puissant : une communauté oasienne du Sud tunisien. Paris (France): Archives contemporaines, 441 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Berahmani A, Faysse N, Errahj M, Gafsi M. 2012. Chasing water: Diverging farmer’s strategies to cope with the groundwater crisis in the coastal Chaouia region in Morocco. Irrigation and Drainage 6(5): 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1673. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouri S, Gasmi M, Jaouadi M, Souissi I, Lahlou Mimi A, Ben Dhia H. 2007. Étude intégrée des données de surface et de subsurface pour la prospection des bassins hydrogéothermiques : cas du bassin de Maknassy (Tunisie centrale), Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(6): 1298–1315. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.6.1298. [Google Scholar]
  • Cai X. 2008. Water stress, water transfer and social equity in Northern China: Implications for policy reforms. Journal of Environmental Management 87(1): 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.046. [Google Scholar]
  • Chenini I, Ben Mamou A. 2009. Hydrochimie et caractérisation qualitative des ressources en eaux d’un système aquifère multicouche en zone aride : application au bassin de Maknassy (Tunisie centrale), Sécheresse 20(2): 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1684/sec.2009.0180. [Google Scholar]
  • Daoud A, Trauma J. 2000. Rehabilitation of damaged lands in southern-central Tunisia: a case study of the southeastern side of Melloussi Djebel. Sécheresse 12(2): 111–120. [Google Scholar]
  • DGRE. 2014. Annuaire piézométrique de la Tunisie. Tunisie: Ministère de l’Agriculture et des Ressources hydrauliques, 329 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Diwakara H, Chandrakanth MG. 2007. Beating negative externality through groundwater recharge in India: a resource economic analysis. Environment and Development Economics 12: 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X06003500. [Google Scholar]
  • Elloumi M. 2016. La gouvernance des eaux souterraines en Tunisie. IWMI Project Report N°7 «Groundwater Governance in the Arab Word», 121 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fautras M. 2016. La terre entre racines, épargnes et spéculations. Appropriations foncières et recompositions de l’espace rural à Regueb (Tunisie). Thèse en Géographie. France: Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, 541 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Feuillette S. 2001. Vers une gestion de la demande sur une nappe en accès libre : exploration des interactions ressources-usages par les systèmes multi-agents : application à la nappe de Kairouan, Tunisie Centrale. Thèse. France: Université de Montpellier II, 350 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fischer C, Aubron C, Trouvé A, Sekhar M, Ruiz L. 2022. Groundwater irrigation reduces overall poverty but increases socioeconomic vulnerability in a semiarid region of southern India. Scientific Reports 12: 8850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12814-0. [Google Scholar]
  • Frija A, Chebil A, Stijn S, Faysse N. 2014. A critical assessment of groundwater governance in Tunisia. Water Policy 16(2): 358–373. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2013.038. [Google Scholar]
  • Frija A, Dhehibi B, Chebil A, Willholth KG. 2016a. Performance evaluation of ground water management instruments: The case of irrigation sector in Tunisia. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 1(1-2): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2015.12.001. [Google Scholar]
  • Frija I, Frija A, Marlet S, Leghrissi H, Faysse N. 2016b. Gestion de l’usage d’une nappe par un groupement d’agriculteurs : l’expérience de Bsissi Oued El Akarit en Tunisie. Alternatives Rurales 4: 12. [Google Scholar]
  • Gafrej R. 2017. Gouvernance de l’eau en Tunisie. Étude du cas du gouvernorat de Kasserine. International Alert, 74 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gharbi I, Elloumi M. 2023. L’agriculture irriguée en Tunisie : politiques hydrauliques et politiques de régulation foncière. Cahiers Agricultures 32: 17. https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2023010. [Google Scholar]
  • Hazell PBR, Norton RD. 1986. Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. New York (USA): Mac Millan Publishing Company, 399 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hemdi M. 2022. Situation des ressources en eau dans le Gouvernorat de Sidi Bouzid. Regional seminar on: «The adoption of smart irrigation technologies in scheduling irrigation in water limited areas», 6-8 juin, Tunisia. [Google Scholar]
  • Jouili M, Kahouli I, Elloumi M. 2013. Libéralisation de l’accès aux ressources hydrauliques et processus d’exclusion au niveau du gouvernorat de Sidi Bouzid. Études Rurales 192: 117–134. https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesrurales.9929. [Google Scholar]
  • Kahouli I, Elloumi M. 2015. Libéralisation de l’accès à l’eau, tenures foncières et dynamique agraire : le cas de la délégation du Regueb dans le Gouvernorat de Sidi Bouzid. In : Vianey G, Requier-Desjardins M, Paoli JC, eds. Accaparement, action publique, stratégies individuelles et ressources naturelles : regards croisés sur la course aux terres et à l’eau en contextes méditerranéens. Montpellier (France): Options Méditerranéennes. Série B. Études et Recherches 72. pp. 177–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Kemper KE. 2007. Instruments and institutions for groundwater management. In : Giordano M, Villholth JG. The agricultural groundwater revolution: Opportunities and threats to development. Wallingford (UK) / Colombo (Sri Lanka): CABI / IWMI, pp. 153–172. [Google Scholar]
  • Khanfir R. 2017. Le stress hydrique en Tunisie. In : La Méditerranée face à la raréfaction des ressources en eau. Center of Mediterranean and International Studies, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 103 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahin S, Ashok KR. 2011. Impact of groundwater over-draft on farm income and efficiency in crop production. Agricultural Economics Research Review 24: 291–300. [Google Scholar]
  • MARHP. 2019. Répartition des superficies irriguées selon la source d’eau, 2017-2018, Tunisie, 213 p. [Google Scholar]
  • MARHP. 2021. Rapport annuel du secteur de l’eau-année 2020, Tunisie, 282 p. [Google Scholar]
  • McCarl AB, Spreen TH. 2011. Applied Mathematical Programming Using Algebraic Systems. College Station (TX, USA): Texas A&M University, 567 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sears L, Lin Lawell CYC, Torres G, Walter MT. 2021. Managing common pool resources: Lessons from groundwater resource extraction in California. Working paper, USA: Cornell University, 50 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Shah T. 2014. Groundwater Governance and Irrigated Agriculture. Tec Background papers N°19. Stockholm (Sweden): Elanders eds, 71 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharif M, Ashok KR. 2011. Impact of Groundwater Over-draft on Farm Income and Efficiency in Crop Production. Agricultural Economics Research Review 24: 291–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma P, Sharma RC. 2006. Factors determining farmer’s decision for buying irrigation water: Study in groundwater market in Rajasthan. Agricultural Economics Research Review 19: 39–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Soula R, Chebil A, Majdoub R, Crespo D, Albiac J, Kahil T. 2023. Evaluation of the Impact of Groundwater Management Policies Under Climate and Economic Changes in Tunisia. Water Economics and Policy 9(1): 2340005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X23400052. [Google Scholar]
  • Srivastava SK, Ramesh C, Singh J, Kaur AP, Jain R, Kingsly I, et al. 2017. Revisiting groundwater depletion and its implications on farm economics in Punjab, India. Current Science 113(3): 422–429. [Google Scholar]
  • Reddy VR. 2005. Costs of resource depletion externalities: a study of groundwater overexploitation in Andhra Pradesh, India. Environment and Development Economics 10: 533–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X05002329. [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson DW. 2002. Construction and operation cost of groundwater pumps for irrigation in the Riverine plain. Clayton (Australia): CSIRO Land and Water, 36 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Rogers DH, Alam M. 1999. Comparing irrigation energy costs. Irrigation Management Series MF-2360, Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, 8 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wichelns D. 2010. Agricultural Water Pricing: United States. In : Sustainable Management of Water Resources in Agriculture. Paris (France): OECD Publishing, 27 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264083578-16-en. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.