| Issue |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 28, 2019
Durabilité de la production dans les zones cotonnières d’Afrique de l’Ouest. Coordonnateurs : Mamy Soumare, Michel Havard, Bruno Bachelier
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 26 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2019026 | |
| Published online | 11 November 2019 | |
- Baillard D. 2006. Le Burkina passe au coton transgénique. RFI, http://www.rfi.fr/actufr/articles/083/article_47764.asp, consulté le 03/12/2006. [Google Scholar]
- Coulibaly B, Niang M, Van der Pol F. 1993. Relations entre les pratiques d’amélioration des sols et les conditions socio-économiques des exploitations agricoles au Mali. Club du Sahel, 52 p. [Google Scholar]
- Barwale RB, Gadwal VR, Zehr U, Zehr B. 2004. Prospects for Bt cotton technology in India. AgBioForum 7: 23–26. [Google Scholar]
- Berti F, Bioche F, Koama PE, Barry H, Ouédraogo DM. 2007. Étude sur l’analyse et les stratégies de développement durable de la filière coton. Rapport final. AGRER, Bruxelles. 267 p. [Google Scholar]
- Bharathan G. 2000. Bt-cotton in India: anatomy of a controversy. Current Science 79: 1067–1075. [Google Scholar]
- Cabanilla LS, Abdoulaye T, Sanders HJ. 2005. Economic cost of non-adoption of Bt cotton in West Africa: with special reference to Mali. International Journal of Biotechnology 7: 46–61. [Google Scholar]
- CFDT. 1995. Filières cotonnières : nouvelles mesures fiscales depuis la dévaluation. Coton et Développement 13: 34–35. [Google Scholar]
- Fok M. 1998. Cotton yield stagnation: addressing a common effect of various causes. In: Gillham FM, ed. World Cotton Research Conference 2. Athens, sept. 5-11, 1998: Petridis, P, Vol. 1, pp. 38–45. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. 2004. Agricultural biotechnology. Meeting the needs of the poor? In: FAO, ed. The State of Food and Agriculture 2003–2004. Roma, pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
- Fichet M. 1996. L’impact de la privatisation dans les pays africains de la zone Franc. Coton et Développement 20: 8–18. [Google Scholar]
- Fok M. 2006. Conditions, résultats et perspectives d’utilisation du coton génétiquement modifié (coton Bt) dans les PED. Revue Tiers Monde: 773–798. [Google Scholar]
- Fok M. 2007. Analyse multifactorielle de la baisse du rendement coton en zone CMDT : de la physiologie à l’idéologie. Montpellier, France: CIRAD. [Google Scholar]
- Fok M. 2016. Impacts du coton-Bt sur les bilans financiers des sociétés cotonnières et des paysans au Burkina Faso. Cahiers Agricultures 25(3): 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Gakpo JO. 2018. Burkina Faso cotton industry wants to bring back GMO seeds. Available at: https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2018/02/burkina-faso-cotton-industry-wants-bring-back-gmo-seeds/, consulté le 14/06/2019. [Google Scholar]
- Glover D. 2010. Exploring the resilience of Bt Cotton’s ‘pro-poor success story’. Development and Change 41: 955–981. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gouse M, Kirsten J, Shankar B, Thirtle C. 2005. Bt cotton in Kwazulu Natal: technological Triumph but institutional failure. Université de Pretoria. [Google Scholar]
- Graff G, Roland-Holst D, Zilberman D. 2006. Agricultural biotechnology and poverty reduction in low-income countries. World Development 34: 1430–1445. [Google Scholar]
- Gruère GP, Mehta-Bhatt P, Sengupta D. 2008. Bt cotton and farmer suicides in India. Reviewing the evidence. IFPRI, Washington, DC: 64 p. [Google Scholar]
- Herring RJ. 2007. The Genomics revolution and development studies: science, poverty and politics. Journal of Development Studies 43: 1–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hofs JL, Fok M, Gouse M, Kirsten J. 2006. Diffusion du CGM dans une filière instable en Afrique du Sud et les leçons pour l’Afrique Zone Franc. Revue Tiers Monde: 799–823. [Google Scholar]
- Morse S, Bennett R, Ismael Y. 2007. Isolating the ‘farmer’ effect as a component of the advantage of growing genetically modified varieties in developing countries: a Bt cotton case study from Jalgaon, India. The Journal of Agricultural Science 145: 491–500. [Google Scholar]
- Morse S, Bennett R, Ismael Y. 2004. Why Bt cotton pays for small-scale producers in South Africa. e Biotechnology 22: 379–380. [Google Scholar]
- Paarlberg RL. 2008. Starved for science: how biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Harvard University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Paarlberg RL. 2000. Governing the GM crop revolution: policy choices for developing countries. IFPRI: Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper, Washington DC, 44 p. [Google Scholar]
- Pemsl DE, Waibel H, Orphal J. 2004. A methodology to assess the profitability of Bt-cotton: case study results from the state of Karnataka, India. Crop Protection 23: 1249–1257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Persley GJ. 2006. Agricultural biotechnology and the poor: promethean science. Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor. Washington DC: CGIAR, pp. 2–21. [Google Scholar]
- Pray CE, Ma D, Huang J, Qiao F. 2001. Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Development 29: 813–825. [Google Scholar]
- Qaim M, de Janvry A. 2005. Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects. Environment and Development Economics 10: 179–200. [Google Scholar]
- Qaim M, Subramanian A, Naik G, Zilberman D. 2006. Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India. Review of Agricultural Economics 28: 48–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Renaudin C. 2010. Vulnérabilité du paysannat cotonnier dans l’Est du Burkina Faso. Cahiers Agricultures 19(1): 54–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Renaudin C, Pelc H, Opois J. 2012. Cotonnier génétiquement modifié : l’expérience d’une campagne agricole au Burkina Faso. Cahiers Agricultures 21(6): 387–394. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Scoones I. 2006. Can biotechnology work for the poor? A sceptical look at the emerging ‘consensus’. https://steps-centre.org/wp-content/uploads/Agr_bio.pdf, consulté le 13/06/2014. [Google Scholar]
- Smale M, Niane A, Zambrano P. 2010. Une revue des analyses de l’impact économique des plantes transgéniques dans les agricultures non industrialisées. Economie Rurale 315: 60–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stone GD. 2004. Social constraints on crop biotechnology in developing countries. AgBioForum 7: 76–79. [Google Scholar]
- Vitale JR, Glick H, Greenplate J, Abdennadher M, Traoré O. 2008. Second-generation Bt Cotton field trials in Burkina Faso: analyzing the potential benefits to West African farmers. Crop Science 48: 1958–1966. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.