Open Access
Issue |
Cah. Agric.
Volume 31, 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 2 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2021036 | |
Published online | 17 January 2022 |
- Agence Bio. 2019. L’agriculture biologique, un accélérateur économique, à la résonance sociale et sociétale. Paris (France) : Agence pour le Développement et la Promotion de l’Agriculture Biologique, 43 p. [Google Scholar]
- Agence Bio. 2021. Le bio, acteur incontournable de la souveraineté alimentaire. Dossier de presse – juillet 2021 – Les chiffres 2020 du secteur bio. Paris (France) : Agence pour le Développement et la Promotion de l’Agriculture Biologique, 28 p. [Google Scholar]
- Agra Presse Hebdo. 2004. L’INAO veut distinguer les meilleures AOC. [2020/01/10]. http://www.agrapresse.fr/l-inao-veut-distinguer-les-meilleures-aoc-art227280-5.html. [Google Scholar]
- Alvarez A, Arias C, Greene W. 2004. Accounting for unobservable in production models: Management and inefficiency. Economic Working Paper at Centro de Estudios Andaluces from Centro de Estudios Andaluces, E2004/72, pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Bogetoft P. 2012. Performance analysis DEA. In: Bogetoft P, ed. Performance benchmarking: Mesuring and managing performance. New York (USA): Springer US, pp. 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6043-5_4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Briec W, Peypoch N. 2010. Microéconomie de la production. Bruxelles (Belgique) : Éditions De Boeck, 245 p. [Google Scholar]
- CCVF. 2015. Bilan des vendages et millésimes 2015. Paris (France) : Confédération des coopératives vinicoles de France, 16 p. [Google Scholar]
- Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dedieu MS, Lorge A, Louveau O, Marcus V. 2017. Les exploitations en agriculture biologique : quelles performances économiques ? Paris (France) : Insee Références, 12 p. [Google Scholar]
- Delord B, Montaigne E, Coelho C. 2015. Vine planting rights, farm size and economic performance: Do economies of scale matter in the French viticulture sector? Wine Economics and Policy 4(1): 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2015.03.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Edelmann H, Penker M, Quinones-Ruiz X, Broscha K, Marescotti A, Belletti G, et al. 2020. Social learning in food quality governance? Evidences from geographical indications amendments. International Journal of the Commons 14(1): 108–122. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.968. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Farrell MJ. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120(3): 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- FranceAgrimer. 2019. Les chiffres-clés de la filière Viti-Vinicole 2008–2018. Montreuil (France) : FranceAgrimer, 168 p. [Google Scholar]
- Guyomard H, ed. 2013. Vers des agricultures à hautes performances, Volume 1 : Analyse des performances de l’agriculture biologique. Paris (France) : INRA / Commissariat général à la stratégie et à la prospective, 368 p. [Google Scholar]
- Jeanneaux P, Blasquiet-Revol H, Gillot M. 2018 (rendu public en 2019). Compétitivité hors coût des exploitations agricoles françaises. Projet DIFFÉRENCIATION, financé par le ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation et VetAgro Sup (UMR Territoires), 119 p. [Google Scholar]
- Kumbhakar S, Tsionas M, Sipilainen T. 2009. Joint estimation of technology choice and technical efficiency: An application to organic and conventional dairy farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis 31(3): 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0081-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Olesen OB, Petersen NC. 2016. Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis: A review. European Journal of Operational Research 251(1): 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Oude Lansink A, Pietola K, Bäckman S. 2002. Efficiency and productivity of conventional and organic farms in Finland 1994–1997. European Review of Agricultural Economics 29(1): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/29.1.51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Porter ME. 1985. Competitive advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York (USA): The Free Press, 32 p. [Google Scholar]
- Pouzenc M, Vincq JL. 2013. Faire du bio ! Faire du terroir ? Le terroir viticole de Gaillac au risque de l’agriculture biologique. Toulouse (France) : Presses Universitaires du Mirail – CNRS, pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.4000/soe.519. [Google Scholar]
- Rousset S, Traversac J. 2014. Chapitre 6. Différenciation de la gouvernance territoriale et de la qualité : lecture comparée des filières vitivinicoles. In : Jeanneaux P, ed. Repenser l’économie rurale. Versailles (France) : Éditions Quæ, pp. 94–108. https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.jean.2014.01.0094. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sahoo BK, Mehdiloozad M, Tone K. 2014. Cost, revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: A directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research 237: 921–931. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Shephard RW. 1981. Cost and production functions. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 106 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51578-1. [Google Scholar]
- Vandecandelaere E, Teyssier C, Barjolle D, Jeanneaux P, Fournier S, Beucherie O. 2018. Strengthening sustainable food systems through geographical indications – An analysis of economic impacts. Roma (Italy): Nutrition and Food Systems Division and the Investment Centre Division, under the FAO/EBRD cooperation, report N°13, 135 p. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.