EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 28 (2019) Cah. Agric., 28 (2019) 8 References
Issue
Cah. Agric.
Volume 28, 2019
Multifacet realities of work in agriculture. Coordonnateurs : Benoît Dedieu, Julio Cesar Damasceno, Guillermo Neiman, Sandra Schiavi
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2019008
Published online 04 June 2019
  • Anglade J, Godfroy M, Coquil X. 2018. A device for sharing knowledge and experiences on experimental farm station to sustain the agroecological transition. 13th European IFSA Symposium, 1–5 July 2018, Chania, Greece. http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2018/1_Anglade.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • ANSES. 2014. Exposition des travailleurs agricoles aux pesticides. Revue systématique de la littérature scientifique disponible sur les expositions aux pesticides des travailleurs agricoles en France. Document janvier 2014. France : ANSES. https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/AIR2011sa0192Ra-An00.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Anzalone G, Purseigle F. 2015. Délegation d’activités et sous-traitance : au service de la transmission de l’exploitation ou d’un patrimoine Dans : Gasselin P, Choisis JP, Petit S, Purseigle F, Zasser S, eds. L’agriculture en famille : travailler, réinventer, transmettre. Paris : EDP Sciences, pp. 327–338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bánkuti FI, Damasceno JC, Schiavi SM, Kuwaraha KC, Prizon RC. 2018. Structural features, labor conditions and family succession in dairy production systems in Paraná State, Brazil. Cahiers Agricultures 27(4): 45004. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018028. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Baudron F, Misiko M, Getnet B, Nazare R, Sariah J, Kaumbutho P. 2019. Labour and mechanisation of African smallholder agriculture: Myths, reality, and implications. Agron Sust Dev, in press. [Google Scholar]
  • Beaujeu R, Emlinger C, Greenville J, Jouanjean P. 2019. Emplois, commerce international et internationalisation des filières. Dans : Forget V, Depeyrot JN, Mahé M, Midler E, Hugonnet M, Beaujeu R et al., eds. Actif’Agri. Recompositions des emplois et du travail agricoles. Centre d’étude et de prospective, Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation. Paris : La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Bendahan AB, Poccard-Chapuis R, Dantas de Medeiros R, de Lucena Costa N, Tourrand JF. 2018. Management and labour in an integrated crop-livestock-forestry system in Roraima, Brazilian Amazonia. Cahiers Agricultures 27(2): 25005. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018014. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernard C, Duvernoy I, Dufour A, Albaladejo C. 2006. Les relations sociales des agriculteurs péri-urbains : quelles relations au territoire ? Cahiers Agricultures 6(15): 529–534. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanpain R, ed. 2015. Protecting labour rights in a multi-polar supply chain and mobile global economy. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  • Brignardello M. 2018. Changes and continuities in agricultural work: The case of small and medium-sized vineyards in Mendoza, Argentina. Cahiers Agricultures 27(3): 35007. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018025. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Butler D, Holloway L, Baer C. 2012. The impact of technological change in dairy farming: Robotic milking systems and the changing role of the stockperson. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 173: 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Caldas de Oliveira C, Augusto de Paula Xavier A, Ulbricht L, Pereira Moro AR, Belinelli MM. 2018. Health in the rural environment: A postural evaluation of milking workers in Brazil. Cahiers Agricultures 27(3): 35004. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018021. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Chantre E, Cerf M, Le Bail M. 2015. Transitional pathways towards input reduction on French field crop farms. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 13: 69–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Chizallet M, Barcellini F, Prost L. 2018. Supporting farmers’ management of change towards agroecological practices by focusing on their work: A contribution of ergonomics. Cahiers Agricultures 27(3): 35005. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018023. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Coquil X, Dedieu B, Beguin P. 2018a. Professional transitions towards sustainable farming systems: The development of farmers’ professional worlds. Work 57(2017): 325–337. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-172565. [Google Scholar]
  • Coquil X, Cerf M, Auricoste C, Joannon A, Barcellini F, Cayre P et al. 2018b. Questioning the work of farmers, advisors, teachers and researchers in agro-ecological transition. A review. Agron Sust Dev 38(5): 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-018-0524-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cornwall A, Rivas AM. 2015. From “gender equality” and “women’s empowerment” to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly 36(2): 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Cournut S, Chauvat S, Pastora C, Dos Santos Filho JC, Diéguez F, Hostiou N et al. 2018. Analyzing work organization on livestock farms by the Work Assessment Method. Agron Sust Dev 38: 58. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-018-0534-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dahache S. 2014. L’évolution de la place des femmes en agriculture au prisme des rapports familiaux de production. Dans : Gasselin P, Choisis JP, Petit S, Purseigle F, Zasser S, eds. L’agriculture en famille : travailler, réinventer, transmettre. Paris : EDP Sciences, pp. 165–182. [Google Scholar]
  • Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B. 2012. Farming systems research: An approach to inquiry. In : Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic. Netherlands: Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dedieu B, Servière G. 2001. Organisation du travail et fonctionnement des systèmes d’élevage. Renc Rech Rum 8: 245–250. [Google Scholar]
  • Dedieu B, Servière G. 2012. Vingt ans de recherche – Développement sur le travail en élevage : acquis et perspectives. Inra Productions Animales 25(2): 85–100. [Google Scholar]
  • Dedieu B, Damasceno JC. 2016. Complex realities and transformation in work in a diversity of farming models. International Symposium on Work in Agriculture, Maringa, Brazil, 2016. www.workinagriculture.com/IAWA-Activities/International-Symposium-on-Work-in-Agriculture-Maringa-Brazil-2016. [Google Scholar]
  • Dedieu B, Damasceno JC, Neiman G, Schiavi S, eds. 2019. Multifacet realities of work in agriculture. Cahiers Agricultures, Special Issue. https://www.cahiersagricultures.fr/fr/component/toc/?task=topic&id=883. [Google Scholar]
  • Deffontaines N. 2017. Les suicides des agriculteurs. Pluralité des approches pour une analyse configurationnelle du suicide. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté. Dijon, INRA. [Google Scholar]
  • Diao-Camara A. 2013. Le rapport au changement en sociétés pastorales : le cas des éleveurs de Boulal, Tatki et Colonnat (Sénégal). Thèse en sociologie de l’Université de Bourgogne. Dijon, Univ. Bourgogne. https://www.ppzs.org/FichiersComplementaires/Th%C3%A8se%20Astou%20Camara.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Dockès AC, Chauvat S, Correa P, Turlot A, Nettle R. 2019. Advice and advisory roles about work on farms. A review. Agron Sust Dev 39: 2. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-018-0547-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doss C. 2018. Women and agricultural productivity: Reframing the issues. Development Policy Research 36: 35–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2008. Ending poverty and hunger by investing in agriculture and rural areas. Rome, Italy: FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Fiorelli C, Porcher J, Dedieu B. 2010. Improving farm working conditions: A proposal to characterise the individual relationship to work. A case study based on French multi-job-holder sheep farmers. In : Darnhofer I, Grötser M, eds. 9e IFSA Symposium, building sustainable rural future: The added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty, Vienna, 4–6 juillet 2010, pp. 1117–1128. [Google Scholar]
  • Forget V, Depeyrot JN, Mahé M, Midler E, Hugonnet M, Beaujeu R et al., eds. 2019a. Actif’Agri. Recompositions des emplois et du travail agricoles. Centre d’études et de prospective, Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation. Paris : La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Forget V, Grandjean A, Huille A, Legagneux B, Nguyen G, Piet L et al. 2019b. L’emploi et les activités agricoles : chiffres et évolutions clés. Dans : Forget V, Depeyrot JN, Mahé M, Midler E, Hugonnet M, Beaujeu R et al. Actif’Agri. Recompositions des emplois et du travail agricoles. Centre d’études et de prospective, Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation. Paris : La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Gibon A, Rubino R, Sibbald AR, Sorensen JT, Flament JC, Lhoste P, Revilla R. 1999. Livestock farming systems research in Europe and its potential contribution for managing towards sustainability in livestock farming. Livest Prod Sci 96: 11–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Gras C, Hernández V. 2014. Agribusiness and large-scale farming: Capitalist, globalization in Argentine agriculture. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 35(3): 339–357. DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2014.933702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hervieu B, Purseigle F. 2013. Sociologie des mondes agricoles. Paris : Armand Colin. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hostiou N, Dedieu B. 2012. A method for assessing work productivity and flexibility in livestock farms. Animal 6(5): 852–862. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731111002084. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hostiou N, Pham DK, Duteurtre G, Tron Binh V, Dedieu B. 2012. Relationships between work organisation and size of dairy farms: A case study based in Vietnam. Trop Anim Health Prod. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-012-0128-y. [Google Scholar]
  • Hostiou N, Fagon J, Chauvat S, Turlot A, Kling F, Boivin X et al. 2017. Impact of precision livestock farming on work and human-animal interactions on dairy farms. A review. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 21: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • IAWA, International Association on Work in Agriculture. 2018. https://www.workinagriculture.com. [Google Scholar]
  • INSERM Expert Report. 2013. Expertise collective pesticides. Effet sur la santé. Synthèse et recommandations. https://www.inserm.fr/information-en-sante/expertises-collectives/pesticides-effets-sur-sante. [Google Scholar]
  • Lémery B. 2003. Les agriculteurs dans la fabrique d’une nouvelle agriculture. Sociologie du Travail 45(1): 9–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Louazel V. 2018. Des agriculteurs sous pression : une profession en souffrance. Rencontres recherches ruminants, Paris, 5–6 décembre 2018. http://www.journees3r.fr/spip.php?article4626. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas V, Gasselin P, Van Der Ploeg JD. 2018. Local inter-farm cooperation: A hidden potential for the agroecological transition in northern agricultures. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 2018: 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Madelrieux S, Dedieu B. 2008, Qualification and assessment of work organisation in livestock farms. Animal 2(3): 435–447. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Magnan A, Laurent C. 2018. Les publics cibles du conseil santé-sécurité au travail en agriculture. Rapport INRA-IRES. Grignon : INRA, 115 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahé M, Jacques-Jouvenot D, Gloker O, Quelin C. 2019. La mobilité professionnelle des agriculteurs. Dans : Forget V, Depeyrot JN, Mahé M, Midler E, Hugonnet M, Beaujeu R et al. Actif’Agri. Transformations des emplois et des activités en agriculture. Centre d’études et de prospective, Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation. Paris : La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Malanski P, Schiavi S, Dedieu B. 2018. Thinking about the future of farming through the different facets of “work in agriculture”. Textual analysis of papers from the First Symposium on Work in Agriculture. 13th IFSA Symposium, 1–5 July, Chania (Greece). http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2018/2_Malanski.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Malanski P, Ingrand S, Hostiou N. 2019a. A new framework to analyze changes in work organization for permanent employees on livestock farms. Agron Sust Dev 39: 12. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-019-0557-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Malanski P, Schiavi S, Dedieu B. 2019b. Characterizing the “work in agriculture” scientific communities: A bibliometric review. Accepted in Agron Sust Dev. [Google Scholar]
  • Nettle R, Kuehne G, Lee K, Armstrong D. 2018. A new framework to analyse workforce contribution to Australian cotton farm adaptability. Agron Sust Dev 38: 38. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-018-0514-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nye C. 2018. The “blind spot” of agricultural research: Labour flexibility, composition and worker availability in the South West of England. Cahiers Agricultures 27(3): 35002. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018018. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Owusu V, Abdulai A, Abdul-rahman S. 2011. Non-farm work and food security among farm households in Northern Ghana. Food Policy 36(2): 108–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Parodi G. 2018. Agroecological transition and reconfiguration of horticultural work among family farmers in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Cahiers Agricultures 27(3): 35003. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018020. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Preibisch K. 2010. Pick-your-own labor: Migrant workers and flexibility in canadian agriculture. Int Migr Rev 44: 404–441. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00811.x. [Google Scholar]
  • RMT Travail en élevage. 2019. http://rmt-travail-elevage.fr/. [Google Scholar]
  • Sraïri MT, Bahri S, Ghabiyel Y. 2018. Work management as a means to adapt to constraints in farming systems: A case study from two regions in Morocco. Cahiers Agricultures 27(1): 15007. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2017066. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Svensson M, Urinboyev R, Wigerfelt-Svensson A, Lundqvist P, Littorin M, Albin M. 2013. Migrant agricultural workers and their socio-economic, occupational and health conditions – A literature review. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2297559. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Ploeg JD. 1994. Styles of farming. An introductory note on concepts and methodology. In : Van der Ploeg JD, Long A, eds. Born from within. Practices and perspectives on endogenous rural development. Assen, Maastrich (The Netherlands): Van Gorcum. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Ploeg JD, Laurent C, Blondeau F, Bonnafous P. 2009. Farm diversity, classification schemes and multifunctionality. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 124–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Wane A, Touré I, Njiru N, Diouf Mballo A. 2018. Securing Sahelian pastoralism by using a remunerated workforce for livestock keeping activities: The ambivalence of commodification. Cahiers Agricultures 27(3): 35006. DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2018024. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • World Bank. 2018. Agriculture for development. Washington: World Bank. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang QF, Donaldson JA. 2010. From peasants to farmers: Peasant differentiation, labor regimes, and land-rights institutions in China’s agrarian transition. Polit Soc 38: 458–489. DOI: 10.1177/0032329210381236. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang X, Yang J, Reardon T. 2017. Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture. China Economic Review 83: 184–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.